From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/16621 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: rb Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Re: cygwin/tetex or miktex? Date: 11 Oct 2004 00:34:14 -0400 Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Message-ID: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097481456 22513 80.91.229.6 (11 Oct 2004 07:57:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 07:57:36 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon Oct 11 09:57:26 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CGv3e-00075e-00 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:57:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A43127A0; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:57:25 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 03515-08-2; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:57:22 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C4C1278B; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:57:21 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11AF71278A for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 06:34:16 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 01931-02 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 06:34:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail1.panix.com (unknown [166.84.1.72]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311C012784 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 06:34:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3DE448723 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:34:14 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from rb@localhost) by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p2-a/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id i9B4YEo14317; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:34:14 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-Lines: 22 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:57:21 +0200 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:16621 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:16621 "Patrick Gundlach" writes: > Hello rb, > >> Is one of these two preferable when running ConTeXt on windows? > > please don't use the subject alone, it is confusing. Hello Patrick, Good point, thanks for the reminder and thanks for the suggestions. > You can also use fptex (or texlive). I'd prefer fptex over miktex over > tetex/cygwin. But I am not the person to ask, since I haven't seen a > windows system in a while. Just my impression from reading some > mailing lists and news groups. You might think of posting your > experience to this list. If I have any experiences worth sharing, I shall certainly do so. Thank-you --