From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/16616
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: rb <rb@panix.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: cygwin/tetex or miktex?
Date: 08 Oct 2004 19:17:08 -0400
Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl
Message-ID: <kx9is9ker63.fsf@panix5.panix.com>
Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097440434 28406 80.91.229.6 (10 Oct 2004 20:33:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 20:33:54 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Oct 10 22:33:41 2004
Return-path: <ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl>
Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl)
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CGkNx-0006tP-00
	for <gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org>; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:33:41 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC821278D;
	Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:33:33 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 30919-05; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:33:31 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E2E12772;
	Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:33:31 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F9912771
	for <ntg-context@ntg.nl>; Sat,  9 Oct 2004 01:17:09 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id 19022-05 for <ntg-context@ntg.nl>;
	Sat,  9 Oct 2004 01:17:09 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from mail1.panix.com (unknown [166.84.1.72])
	by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC531276B
	for <ntg-context@ntg.nl>; Sat,  9 Oct 2004 01:17:08 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5])
	by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481164871C
	for <ntg-context@ntg.nl>; Fri,  8 Oct 2004 19:17:08 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: (from rb@localhost)
	by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p2-a/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id i98NH8r21480;
	Fri, 8 Oct 2004 19:17:08 -0400 (EDT)
Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Original-Lines: 4
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:33:29 +0200
X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context.ntg.nl>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context>
List-Post: <mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl>
List-Help: <mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:16616
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:16616

Is one of these two preferable when running ConTeXt on windows?

Thank you
--