From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/43969 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mohamed Bana Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Can we make font loading much faster? Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:03:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <68bfdc900809120730i37ce72edi6d3f4058209e7aa5@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1221246447 14405 80.91.229.12 (12 Sep 2008 19:07:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:07:27 +0000 (UTC) To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Sep 12 21:08:22 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KeE02-0005dg-Qc for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:08:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F291FDF8; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:07:06 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18158-02; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:06:24 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93E71FE05; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:04:16 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2951FBC6 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:04:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15721-02-5 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:03:33 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE711FBBD for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:03:30 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KeDvT-0001s1-2z for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:03:27 +0000 Original-Received: from 87-194-191-26.bethere.co.uk ([87.194.191.26]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:03:27 +0000 Original-Received: from abbg770 by 87-194-191-26.bethere.co.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:03:27 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 2 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 87.194.191.26 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:43969 Archived-At: I've also been wondering why LuaTeX is considerably slower than XeTeX. Has anyone been doing any research into LuaJIT? ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________