From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/48883 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jesse Alama Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Spacing after \cite Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:09:58 -0700 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1238350283 11340 80.91.229.12 (29 Mar 2009 18:11:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:11:23 +0000 (UTC) To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Mar 29 20:12:41 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LnzUb-00061f-Sm for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:12:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC741FCA0; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:10:53 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23427-01; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:10:20 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3721FC61; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:10:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9961FC61 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:10:17 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19543-01 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:10:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from filter3-til.mf.surf.net (filter3-til.mf.surf.net [194.171.167.219]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0DA1FC45 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:10:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by filter3-til.mf.surf.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n2TIA9rp020508 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:10:09 +0200 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LnzST-0000zd-3B for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:10:09 +0000 Original-Received: from nmd.sbx05541.paloaca.wayport.net ([98.96.108.230]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:10:09 +0000 Original-Received: from alama by nmd.sbx05541.paloaca.wayport.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:10:09 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 28 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: nmd.sbx05541.paloaca.wayport.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:SatylLZidwWAgwY9/tMeZLzVMmE= X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=80.91.229.2; country=NO; region=12; city=Oslo; latitude=59.9167; longitude=10.7500; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=59.9167,10.7500&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 200709974 - f2fa86a56ef7 - 20090329 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 194.171.167.219 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:48883 Archived-At: Aditya Mahajan writes: > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > >> So I am guessing that the difference is because of something else, >> but I cannot see any differences. > > The old version gives > > \dodoubleempty #1->\noshowargumenterror \doifnextcharelse > [{\dodoubletestempty #1} {\dodoublefakeempty #1} > #1<-\dododocite > > > The new one gives > > \dodoubleempty #1->\noshowargumenterror \doifnextoptionalelse {\dodoubletestemp > ty #1} {\dodoublefakeempty #1} > #1<-\dododocite > > So, \doifnextcharelse vs \doifnextoptionalelse. Any progress on this? I'm seeing the same behavior. Jesse -- Jesse Alama (alama@stanford.edu) ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________