Another plant in the garden: modules

Another plant in the garden: modules

[Patrick Gundlach]

Dear ConTeXters,

I have planted a small bush in the garden, which is called 'modules'.
I collect third party modules and put them in one place. One of the
things the authors (and of course all ConTeXt users) will hopefully
get soon is an automatic synchronization with CTAN. I am in contact
with the CTAN maintainers about that. The service will grow during the
nice summer months, so please send me all the modules that you have on
your hard disks but never published yet.

You can find it at <http://modules.contextgarden.net>.


  Patrick
-- 
ConTeXt wiki: http://contextgarden.net

Re: Another plant in the garden: modules

[Henning Hraban Ramm]

Am 03.04.2005 um 18:42 schrieb Patrick Gundlach:
> I have planted a small bush in the garden, which is called 'modules'.
> I collect third party modules and put them in one place. One of the

Good idea.
I wonder why bib and math modules are missing? Are they already gone to 
the core?


Grüßlis vom Hraban!
---
http://www.fiee.net/texnique/
http://contextgarden.net

Re: Another plant in the garden: modules

[Thomas A.Schmitz]

On Apr 6, 2005, at 8:53 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> Good idea.
> I wonder why bib and math modules are missing? Are they already gone 
> to the core?
>
>
> Grüßlis vom Hraban!
> ---
>
% kpsewhich t-bib.tex
/usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/tex/context/bib/t-bib.tex

% kpsewhich t-nath.tex
/usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.tetex/tex/context/maths/t-nath.tex

Best wishes

Thomas

Re: Another plant in the garden: modules

[Adam Lindsay]

Thomas A.Schmitz said this at Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:02:29 +0200:

>> I wonder why bib and math modules are missing? Are they already gone 
>> to the core?
>
>% kpsewhich t-bib.tex
>/usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/tex/context/bib/t-bib.tex

True.
It would be nice if (at least) the documentation could live on the
garden... I had to google Taco's old site last night in order to work
through some t-bib stuff.

>% kpsewhich t-nath.tex
>/usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.tetex/tex/context/maths/t-nath.tex

Um, that might be unique to your own system. I don't have t-nath on a
pretty up-to-date install.

adam
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept.     atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk
 Lancaster University, InfoLab21        +44(0)1524/510.514
 Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK             Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: Another plant in the garden: modules

[Patrick Gundlach]

Hello Hraban and others,

>> I have planted a small bush in the garden, which is called 'modules'.
>> I collect third party modules and put them in one place. One of the
>
> Good idea.
> I wonder why bib and math modules are missing? Are they already gone
> to the core?

Do you think that it would make sense to list/describe the ones in the
distribution as well?

Patrick
-- 
ConTeXt wiki and much more: http://contextgarden.net

Re: Another plant in the garden: modules

[Patrick Gundlach]

>>% kpsewhich t-nath.tex
>>/usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.tetex/tex/context/maths/t-nath.tex
>
> Um, that might be unique to your own system. I don't have t-nath on a
> pretty up-to-date install.

that is interesting, it is in tetex 3.0, but not in the distribution. So
we should handle it as a not-included module. (?)

Patrick
-- 
ConTeXt wiki: http://contextgarden.net

Re: Re: Another plant in the garden: modules

[Henning Hraban Ramm]

Am 06.04.2005 um 21:11 schrieb Patrick Gundlach:
> Do you think that it would make sense to list/describe the ones in the
> distribution as well?

Yes, they go unnoticed otherwise.

Grüßlis vom Hraban!
---
http://www.fiee.net/texnique/
http://contextgarden.net

Re: Re: Another plant in the garden: modules

[Maurice Diamantini]

Le 6 avr. 05, à 21:11, Patrick Gundlach a écrit :

> Hello Hraban and others,
>> I wonder why bib and math modules are missing? Are they already gone
>> to the core?
>
> Do you think that it would make sense to list/describe the ones in the
> distribution as well?

Yes, because the modules in the core depend on the context version.
So I think all modules should be listed, with some additionnal 
information
such that
	"in the core since  tetex-3.0-1"
or
	"in the cvs-core since  2005 mar 01"

e.g.
Textlive (2004) doesn't contains the bib and math modules,
but tetex-3.0-1 does:

ls -al  /sw/share/texmf-dist/{tex,doc}/context/{maths,bib}/
(extract)
         /sw/share/texmf-dist/doc/context/maths/:
                No such file or directory
         /sw/share/texmf-dist/doc/context/bib/:
                83846 aou 30   2004 bibmod-doc.pdf
                31535 aou 30   2004 bibmod-doc.tex

         /sw/share/texmf-dist/tex/context/bib/:
                10120 aou 30   2004 bibl-apa.tex
                11327 aou 30   2004 bibl-aps.tex
                37861 jan 26  12:30 t-bib.tex
                 1805 jan  5  16:59 t-bibltx.tex

         /sw/share/texmf-dist/tex/context/maths/:
                 5762 nov 18  16:47 t-amsl.tex
                92324 nov 18  16:50 t-nath.tex

-- Maurice Diamantini

Re: Another plant in the garden: modules

[Patrick Gundlach]

Hi,


> Am 06.04.2005 um 21:11 schrieb Patrick Gundlach:
>> Do you think that it would make sense to list/describe the ones in the
>> distribution as well?

> Yes, they go unnoticed otherwise.

OK, I have updated the modules section on garden.

Patrick

-- 
ConTeXt wiki and more: http://contextgarden.net