From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/13732 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Patrick Gundlach Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: RME and INI Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 11:17:58 +0200 Organization: privat Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: References: <000501c38bda$0895c3f0$0500a8c0@best> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1065432270 13353 80.91.224.253 (6 Oct 2003 09:24:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Mon Oct 06 11:24:28 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A6RbQ-0007W5-00 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 11:24:28 +0200 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4E310B04; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 11:24:24 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5F510ADF for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 11:17:51 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from [212.227.126.208] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1A6RV0-0000cR-00 for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 11:17:50 +0200 Original-Received: from [62.72.92.65] (helo=levana) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1A6RUz-00038m-00 for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 11:17:49 +0200 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=schnee.local) by levana with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A6RUy-0000LP-00 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 11:17:48 +0200 Original-Received: from schnee.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by schnee.local (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h969Hx0v000464 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 11:17:59 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (from pg@localhost) by schnee.local (8.12.9/8.12.2/Submit) id h969Hx9H000463; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 11:17:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: schnee.local: pg set sender to patrick@gundla.ch using -f Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Lieblings-Musik: the_capricorns In-Reply-To: <000501c38bda$0895c3f0$0500a8c0@best> (Pawel Jackowski na Onet's message of "Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:18:05 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (darwin) Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:13732 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:13732 Hi, > Files looks to be identical but and the second location has a priority. But > which location is more convenient for texexec config file? I put mine in a path that never gets touched by an update of ConTeXt. So I don't have to worry about it. > The second question is WHY I have to copy 'texexec.rme' to 'texexec.ini'? If > I do so and change some settings in 'texexec.ini' and than run > 'texexec --verbose', I can see that settings are still taken from > 'texexec.rme'. Could You tell me what is the point in copying RME to INI and > when INI file is used instead RME? Please post the relevant output (the few lines) of texexec --verbose What system are you using? please run: kpsewhich --format="other text files" -progname=context texexec.rme kpsewhich --format="other text files" -progname=context texexec.ini if you are using a web2c based system (tetex, texlive, fptex...) Patrick -- You are your own rainbow!