From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/19762 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Patrick Gundlach" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: undefined guillemots Date: 11 Apr 2005 22:00:52 +0200 Organization: chaos Message-ID: References: <1ec9559b80018f5bc421e57760143f6f@dandy.net> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1113249618 23659 80.91.229.2 (11 Apr 2005 20:00:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon Apr 11 22:00:16 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DL545-0005Sz-Ov for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:59:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F71012828; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:02:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 00945-09; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:02:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E022212821; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:00:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AC612821 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:00:30 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 00945-04-2 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:00:29 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from lilly.ping.de (lilly.ping.de [83.97.42.2]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 62E4112815 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:00:29 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (qmail 24527 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2005 20:00:28 -0000 Original-Received: (ofmipd 83.97.40.239); 11 Apr 2005 20:00:06 -0000 Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Lieblings-Musik: the_capricorns In-Reply-To: <1ec9559b80018f5bc421e57760143f6f@dandy.net> (Steve Peter's message of "Mon, 11 Apr 2005 14:58:32 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:19762 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:19762 [...] > However, this brings up a more general issue (for Hans, especially). > The symbol is called a guillemet, a diminutive of Guillaume (Le Be), > the typographer. It has nothing to do with the French word for word, > mot. :-) I guess you are right, but the Postscript Name for this glyph is eg. guillemotleft, the unicode name (U+00AB) is 'Left Pointing Guillemet', so guillemot is a slightly reasonable name for that glyph, even if it is wrong ... Patrick PS: Thank you for the lesson, I didn't know that yet. -- ConTeXt wiki and more: http://contextgarden.net