From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/13777 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Patrick Gundlach Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: first attempt to run mp (system error) -- summary? Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 23:41:45 +0200 Organization: privat Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: References: <000901c38ca6$8af7a0d0$0500a8c0@best> <1065598042.4594.36.camel@PawCooLinux> <6.0.0.22.2.20031008094621.02a62ef0@server-1> <006f01c38dd9$92077dd0$0500a8c0@best> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1065649805 13453 80.91.224.253 (8 Oct 2003 21:50:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Wed Oct 08 23:50:03 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A7MC3-0000sZ-00 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 23:50:03 +0200 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F4510B62; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:49:59 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D368510B60 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:43:59 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from [212.227.126.162] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1A7M6A-0000c6-00 for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 23:43:58 +0200 Original-Received: from [62.72.92.65] (helo=levana) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1A7M69-0003VX-00 for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 23:43:58 +0200 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=schnee.local) by levana with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A7M3n-0000wY-00 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 23:41:31 +0200 Original-Received: from schnee.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by schnee.local (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h98Lfj0v003108 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:41:45 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (from pg@localhost) by schnee.local (8.12.9/8.12.2/Submit) id h98Lfj6q003107; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:41:45 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: schnee.local: pg set sender to patrick@gundla.ch using -f Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Lieblings-Musik: the_capricorns In-Reply-To: <006f01c38dd9$92077dd0$0500a8c0@best> (Pawel Jackowski na Onet's message of "Wed, 8 Oct 2003 22:19:43 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (darwin) Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:13777 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:13777 Hi again, ... > Doesn't hurt. ...But wait -- I aks to be on the safe side: since I remember, > I use common formats (and every other files in texmf tree) for linux and > windows. Is there ANY reason to generate nativ format for each operating > system? Is there any reason not to make common any other texmf > files? If you have the same system on both sides, I think you are safe. It looks as if web2c systems can share formats if the web2c version number is identical. Patrick -- You are your own rainbow!