From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/16760 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Patrick Gundlach" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: stretched text Date: 25 Oct 2004 17:28:35 +0200 Organization: chaos Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Message-ID: References: <20041025140610.GA7337@mnw.art.pl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098718128 8957 80.91.229.6 (25 Oct 2004 15:28:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon Oct 25 17:28:36 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CM6lw-0007Aw-00 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:28:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790C7127DC; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:28:35 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 12351-02; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:28:33 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7AE127AE; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:28:33 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8F8127A9 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:28:32 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 12314-02 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:28:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from lilly.ping.de (unknown [83.97.42.2]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C11E127A2 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:28:30 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (qmail 10637 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2004 15:28:29 -0000 Original-Received: (ofmipd 83.97.40.230); 25 Oct 2004 15:28:07 -0000 Original-To: "Context discussion-list" X-Lieblings-Musik: the_capricorns In-Reply-To: <20041025140610.GA7337@mnw.art.pl> (Piotr Kopszak's message of "Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:06:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (darwin) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:16760 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:16760 Hi, > I know it's a bad habit to use stretched text, but apparently > formerly people thought differently. I am typesetting old quotations > and would not want to replace stretched text simply by emphasized. Is > it absolutely discouraged in ConTeXt or is there any way to have > it... (in spite of its ugliness). See: http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20020215.201212.09ddd4a6.html Patrick -- ConTeXt wiki: http://contextgarden.net