From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/13776 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Patrick Gundlach Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: first attempt to run mp (system error) -- summary? Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 23:22:02 +0200 Organization: privat Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: References: <000901c38ca6$8af7a0d0$0500a8c0@best> <1065598042.4594.36.camel@PawCooLinux> <6.0.0.22.2.20031008094621.02a62ef0@server-1> <006f01c38dd9$92077dd0$0500a8c0@best> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1065648592 11180 80.91.224.253 (8 Oct 2003 21:29:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Wed Oct 08 23:29:51 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A7LsV-00087Q-00 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 23:29:51 +0200 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7371410B60; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:29:48 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B027010B07 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:23:04 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from [212.227.126.207] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1A7Llu-0005Gc-00 for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 23:23:02 +0200 Original-Received: from [62.72.92.65] (helo=levana) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1A7Llt-0001hn-00 for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 23:23:02 +0200 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=schnee.local) by levana with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A7Lki-0000vY-00 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 23:21:48 +0200 Original-Received: from schnee.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by schnee.local (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h98LM20v003099 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:22:02 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (from pg@localhost) by schnee.local (8.12.9/8.12.2/Submit) id h98LM2L7003098; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:22:02 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: schnee.local: pg set sender to patrick@gundla.ch using -f Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Lieblings-Musik: the_capricorns In-Reply-To: <006f01c38dd9$92077dd0$0500a8c0@best> (Pawel Jackowski na Onet's message of "Wed, 8 Oct 2003 22:19:43 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (darwin) Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:13776 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:13776 Hi, > Pawe/l wrote about: > 1. System error while compiling nested mp code (under Windows) -- > regenerating metafun format solves that good to hear. > 2. 'Memory violating' error while compiling nested mp code (under Linux) -- > still can't find the answer... that is really strange. If you are brave and experienced, you might trace the mpost run with strace to see where the error occurs. Please post the logfile of the bad run. > 3. Missed mp graphics in output PDF -- solved of course... sorry for that > silly question, I've taken the first example appearing in ConTeXt manual > assuming that it is the basic one. This question was not silly at all. I am still confused by the plethora of ways to run mp. >> you don't need --automprun. Everything should work fine w/o. > > I tried to omit this option, but without that MetaPost doesn't run at all. could you post the output of texexec --verbose and the logfile of a simple ConTeXt file with mp code in it? > Doesn't hurt. ...But wait -- I aks to be on the safe side: since I remember, > I use common formats (and every other files in texmf tree) for linux and > windows. Is there ANY reason to generate nativ format for each operating > system? Is there any reason not to make common any other texmf > files? I'd like to know, too. > Surely I will! Which version has tl2003 binarises: linux, windows or both? > By the way, does anybody know if tl2003 binaries are frozen already? For TeX Live 2003, the last update of packages and programs was made on 20 September 2003. For the latest versions, please consult CTAN . Patrick -- You are your own rainbow!