Re: Best source of ConTeXt documentation?

["Patrick Gundlach" <patrick@gundla.ch>]

Hello Salman,

> The problem with "normal
> users" cooking up new styles is the lack of artistic abilities in
> some people (like me). 

But you will never gain artistic abilities by simple copy/paste. 

> One can, obviously go thru the manual cover the cover, but if one
> does not have creative thinking, then creating professional looking
> styles would be hard. That is why, users like me really do not care
> if our documents look like everybody else's (just as long as they
> look professional).

The ability to know how to program/use a text editor/use photoshop
can only help you with the technical difficulties in making a
professional cover and style. Not more. 

> And of course, once we learn the tool, then making small changes
>here and there to make it look slightly different is no big deal.

Each LaTeX document looks slighlty different. But overall they are
extremely easy to classify as a LaTeX document. And why? The
distances and parameters are all given so it looks "right" and there
is no reason to change them.

Patrick
-- 
ConTeXt wiki: http://contextgarden.net
texshow-web:  http://texshow.contextgarden.net
List archive: http://archive.contextgarden.net