From: "Patrick Gundlach" <patrick@gundla.ch>
Subject: Re: No performance improvement under OS X with new beta?
Date: 9 Mar 2005 09:09:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2psy9gs0n.fsf@levana.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <413b3ca978e6f281d4843dad4a11bc58@indiana.edu> (Matthias Weber's message of "Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:13:50 -0500")
Hello Matthias,
> after the recent discussion of ConTeXt processing (some) files 4 times
> as often under OS X
> than elsewhere, I decided to upgrade to the most recent beta and run a
> speed comparison
> on notes I am writing. To my dismay, here are the results:
> ConTeXt ver: 2005.03.02 fmt: 2005.3.4
> total run time : 416 seconds
Our discussion was finished 2005.03.03 so you might have the old
(buggy) version. Do you get the same amount of tex runs on both
systems?
Patrick
--
ConTeXt wiki: http://contextgarden.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-09 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-04 13:44 ConTeXt-updater i-Package updated Steffen Wolfrum
2005-03-04 13:49 ` Mark Smith
2005-03-04 15:58 ` OSX ConTeXt users inventory (was: ConTeXt-updater i-Package updated) Maurice Diamantini
2005-03-04 16:03 ` ConTeXt-updater i-Package updated David Wooten
2005-03-04 16:29 ` Thomas A.Schmitz
2005-03-04 19:50 ` Alan Bowen
2005-03-04 21:43 ` Steve Peter
2005-03-05 9:31 ` h h extern
2005-03-04 16:48 ` Adam Lindsay
2005-03-04 17:13 ` No performance improvement under OS X with new beta? Matthias Weber
2005-03-04 17:20 ` Adam Lindsay
2005-03-04 18:35 ` Matthias Weber
2005-03-04 19:33 ` Adam Lindsay
2005-03-05 9:17 ` h h extern
2005-03-04 17:24 ` Hans Hagen
2005-03-04 18:43 ` Matthias Weber
2005-03-05 9:20 ` h h extern
2005-03-09 8:09 ` Patrick Gundlach [this message]
2005-03-04 14:07 ` ConTeXt-updater i-Package updated Gerben Wierda
2005-03-04 20:13 No performance improvement under OS X with new beta? Steffen Wolfrum
2005-03-05 9:15 ` h h extern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2psy9gs0n.fsf@levana.de \
--to=patrick@gundla.ch \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).