From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/17318 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Patrick Gundlach" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Table of contents, alternative d Date: 29 Nov 2004 19:00:10 +0100 Organization: chaos Message-ID: References: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1101751528 28069 80.91.229.6 (29 Nov 2004 18:05:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon Nov 29 19:05:23 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CYpqR-00034q-00 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:01:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B613127B3; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:01:51 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27868-04; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:01:51 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1733127B2; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:00:00 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C98127B2 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:59:59 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27908-01 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:59:59 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from lilly.ping.de (unknown [83.97.42.2]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E6EA127AE for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:59:59 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: (qmail 11036 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2004 17:59:58 -0000 Original-Received: (ofmipd 83.97.40.194); 29 Nov 2004 17:59:36 -0000 Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Lieblings-Musik: the_capricorns In-Reply-To: (Dirar BOUGATEF's message of "Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:10:05 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (darwin) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:17318 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:17318 "Dirar BOUGATEF" writes: >> From the whole batch of answers i have received i could assume that >> there is > no solution to this problem. You could also conclude from the lack of answers that nobody feels to make a working example of what you wanted to achieve. You (and others, of course) can increase the chance of someone looking into your problem by creating a complete and minimal example of what you tried. It is of course not a guarantee to an answer, but let's say the least thing that a person seeking help should do. It is absolutely no use to publish only a few lines in case of a problem. What the problem-solvers want is code that they can cut and paste to their editor and run it. Then they look at the output and then at the code and sometimes they know where the problem is. One thing that a problem-solver will not want to do is fill in the missing parts of posted code like in a high school exam. I don't try to be smart here, it is just the fact how the community works. Patrick -- ConTeXt wiki: http://contextgarden.net