From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/17281 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Patrick Gundlach" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Problem with \defintion. Date: 28 Nov 2004 19:56:00 +0100 Organization: chaos Message-ID: References: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1101668160 822 80.91.229.6 (28 Nov 2004 18:56:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Nov 28 19:55:56 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CYUDD-0000cr-00 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:55:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E568F127A8; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:55:54 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17395-02-3; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:55:52 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7821279F; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:55:52 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15E71279F for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:55:50 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17395-02-2 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:55:50 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from lilly.ping.de (unknown [83.97.42.2]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 1511C12791 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:55:49 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: (qmail 27063 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2004 18:55:48 -0000 Original-Received: (ofmipd 83.97.40.153); 28 Nov 2004 18:55:26 -0000 Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Lieblings-Musik: the_capricorns In-Reply-To: (Dirar BOUGATEF's message of "Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:41:44 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (darwin) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:17281 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:17281 Hello Dirar, > This is an example: [this is what I mean with complete, but minimal example. The itemize environment has nothing to do with the problem] \definedescription [definition] \starttext \definition{HMV} blablabla \definition{TTV} blablabla % uncomment this to see the error % \definition{QTV} blablabla \stoptext > l.360 \stopitemize [this is the line number] > I can now compile but the doc does talk about this! I guess you meant to write "does not". If you do, than please have a look at 10.2 again. All examples have a \par at the end (at least at a quick glance). And an empty line as you had in your second description is equivalent to \par. The description in texshow-web (and alike) is incorrect. () > Question: Do we have to put a \par. Yes. > It is really bizarre that it solves the problem, cause my items are > defined far away in my document from the definitions. What I think is more bizarre, that the problem did not already occur with two \definition{...}. Patrick -- ConTeXt wiki: http://contextgarden.net