From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/16617 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Patrick Gundlach" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: cygwin/tetex or miktex? Date: 10 Oct 2004 22:57:32 +0200 Organization: chaos Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Message-ID: References: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097441831 31445 80.91.229.6 (10 Oct 2004 20:57:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 20:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Oct 10 22:56:58 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CGkkU-0008FT-00 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:56:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6459312792; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:56:57 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31167-03; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:56:55 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62011277C; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:56:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A91C1277C for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:56:53 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30894-07 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:56:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from lilly.ping.de (unknown [83.97.42.2]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 20DD812775 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:56:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (qmail 6441 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2004 20:56:50 -0000 Original-Received: (ofmipd 83.97.40.179); 10 Oct 2004 20:56:28 -0000 Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Lieblings-Musik: the_capricorns In-Reply-To: (rb@panix.com's message of "08 Oct 2004 19:17:08 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (darwin) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:16617 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:16617 Hello rb, > Is one of these two preferable when running ConTeXt on windows? please don't use the subject alone, it is confusing. You can also use fptex (or texlive). I'd prefer fptex over miktex over tetex/cygwin. But I am not the person to ask, since I haven't seen a windows system in a while. Just my impression from reading some mailing lists and news groups. You might think of posting your experience to this list. Patrick -- ConTeXt wiki: http://contextgarden.net