From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/914 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ecashin@coe.uga.edu (Ed L. Cashin) Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: different page numbers for doc parts Date: 13 Sep 1999 10:13:26 -0400 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: References: <37DAE21C.4FAED122@wxs.nl> <37DCA9E6.D16AB2D2@wxs.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035391758 28296 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 16:49:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:49:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ConTeXt mailing list Original-To: Hans Hagen In-Reply-To: Hans Hagen's message of "Mon, 13 Sep 1999 09:38:14 +0200" Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:914 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:914 Hans Hagen writes: > "Ed L. Cashin" wrote: > > > \setupnumbering[conversion=romannumerals] > \setuppagenumbering > > > ... but the resulting document still has consecutive arabic numerals 1 > > and 2 at the top of the two pages. cont-new.tex is getting loaded, > > \setupnumbering influences numbering of formulas, floats, descriptions, > etc. while \setuppagenumbering influences the pagenumber. Whoo! Thanks--that works. I guess I have a blindspot such that \setupnumbering looks the same as \setuppagenumbering. -- --Ed Cashin ecashin@coe.uga.edu