From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/2490 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ed L Cashin Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: replies Date: 16 Aug 2000 07:13:25 -0400 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: References: <14741.8774.386846.462340@bitmuis.thuis.nl> <39952723.740F14A4@pobox.com> <39958723.6F016F12@gmx.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035393280 9294 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:14:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ConTeXt Original-To: Hraban In-Reply-To: Hraban's message of "Sat, 12 Aug 2000 19:19:31 +0200" Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:2490 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:2490 Hraban writes: > Berend de Boer wrote: > > Yes, I also hate it that reply replies to the sender instead of the > > list. That doesn't facilitate list communication. > > I get other mailing lists where the list server overwrites > the "reply-to" with the list address -- isn't this possible > for the ntg server? Munging the email headers is a kludge to support broken email clients. An email client should provide a "reply to all" feature which will reply to the author and the list. -- --Ed Cashin PGP public key: ecashin@coe.uga.edu http://www.coe.uga.edu/~ecashin/pgp/