From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/33392 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Idris Samawi Hamid" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: buffer error Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:45:49 -0700 Organization: Colorado State University Message-ID: References: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1171644400 23667 80.91.229.12 (16 Feb 2007 16:46:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:46:40 +0000 (UTC) To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Feb 16 17:46:33 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HI6E1-0004Bl-3S for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:46:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FD661; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:44:11 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25422-04-3; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:44:02 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A066E; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:44:02 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE9861 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:44:00 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25422-04-2 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:43:55 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from trueband.net (trueband.net [216.163.120.10]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FF406E for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:43:55 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: (qmail 27565 invoked by uid 1006); 16 Feb 2007 16:46:04 -0000 Original-Received: from ishamid@colostate.edu by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:SA:0(0.0/100.0):. Processed in 3.560059 secs); 16 Feb 2007 16:46:04 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO trueband.net) (172.16.0.16) by -v with SMTP; 16 Feb 2007 16:46:00 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 27030 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2007 16:45:58 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO walayah-main) (67.54.131.34) by -v with SMTP; 16 Feb 2007 16:45:58 -0000 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.02 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:33392 Archived-At: On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:41:13 -0700, Idris Samawi Hamid wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:57:19 -0700, Aditya Mahajan > wrote: > >> I tend to >> think that this is the correct behaviour. Do you really need to define >> the note inside a group? > > Not really, I was just trying to avoid redundancy (putting the > definition in the buffer is for pedagogical purposes only) Sorry, I misunderstood; by 'group' you meant the type-get buffer group. I think that allows me to use the same buffer name for a series of examples (I ripped this method off of some examples from Hans). Idris -- Professor Idris Samawi Hamid Department of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/