contextref vs. cont-enp; co-fonts (retry)

contextref vs. cont-enp; co-fonts (retry)

[Procházka Lukáš]

Hello,

just two notices -

1) When searching for some learning stuff, I found the cont-enp.pdf/12.11.2001 (http://www.pragma-ade.com/show-man-9.htm) which "... is the big reference manual, the one that is supposed to cover the whole of CONTEXT.".

Some time ago, I downloaded the contextref.pdf/8.10.2010 (http://pmrb.free.fr/contextref.pdf), whose content is near to that of cont-enp.pdf.

Probably just one of both documents is supposed to be the FINAL Ctx manual - and this [only] one should be available for download at both sites.

2) Fonts: wiki refers to http://context.aanhet.net/svn/contextman/context-reference/en/co-fonts.pdf (18.11.2009?), whilst the http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/mfonts.pdf (21.11.2005) is a cca twice wider (and newer?) document.

Furthermore, the former document has some links broken (e.g. "(see section ??)" on the page 5 on the first line) and it would be nice if the links were INTERACTIVE (e.g. "(see section <1.5>" to jump to the section 1.5 of the document).

Would it be possible to make links in the "mfonts.pdf" interactive ("jumpable"), even in the print version of the document, e.g. in TOC?

Probably just one of both documents is supposed to explain deeply the stuff about fonts; this [only] one should be refered and available for download.

Friendly regards,

Lukas


___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________