From: "Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد" <Idris.Hamid@colostate.edu>
To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Could you look at this?
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 08:04:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.y4nn0ykxejo439@desktop-mt1m160> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28db48e7-c373-d579-3de6-e531f2d5fbfa@free.fr>
[off-topic]
Hi Jean-Pierre,
On Tue, 08 Aug 2017 01:34:28 -0600, Jean-Pierre Delange
<adeimantos@free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Idriss, Pablo, Wolfgang and Hans,
> It has been a long time since I have read the Wittgenstein
> "Tractacus-Logico-Philosophicus". I remember, when I was 20, that I was
> very puzzled by this assertion : "Wovon man nicht klar sagen, muss man
> schweigen".
That clause comes at the end of a larger assertion:
"Was sich überhaupt sagen lässt, lässt sich klar sagen; und wovon man
nicht reden kann, darüber muss man schweigen."
"What can be said at all can be said clearly; and whereof one cannot speak
thereof one must be silent."
That assertion (as well as the entire Tractatus) involves multiple
epistemic-ontic confusions. For example: It is not the case that what is
clear to one person is automatically clear to another person. Nor is it
the case that a statement which is unclear to the person who hears it is
automatically unclear to the person who stated it.
Unfortunately for Wittgenstein, when held to the standard of his own
benchmark above he often paints himself into a corner. From John Corcoran
(one of the greatest living logicians):
=======
INTERPRETING ARISTOTLE: I took for my principle of interpretation that he
meant what he said: and truly he is a writer who deserves this compliment.
—Augustus De Morgan 1862.
INTERPRETING WITTGENSTEIN: I took for my principle of interpretation that
he meant what he said: and truly he is a writer who deserves this
punishment. —Frango Nabrasa 2002.
=======
https://www.academia.edu/s/a5a4386b75/surprises-in-logic?
> I guess Wittgenstein didn't think about coding numbered paragraphs !
Indeed, his system has perplexed most readers of the Tractatus; some of
his commentators consider it perverse, even a joke. The obscurity of his
numbering system has created something of a cottage industry:
https://philpapers.org/rec/GIBITN
https://philpapers.org/rec/VERTNS
Judged by the standard expressed by the assertion you quoted, Wittgenstein
should not have used his own system!
Idris
--
Idris Samawi Hamid, Professor
Department of Philosophy
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, CO 80512
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-08 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-07 13:54 Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
2017-08-07 18:17 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2017-08-07 19:57 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2017-08-07 22:32 ` Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
2017-08-08 7:29 ` Hans Hagen
2017-08-08 14:04 ` Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
2017-08-08 14:13 ` Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
2017-08-09 4:14 ` Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
2017-08-09 5:32 ` Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
2017-08-07 22:26 ` Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
2017-08-08 7:34 ` Jean-Pierre Delange
2017-08-08 14:04 ` Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=op.y4nn0ykxejo439@desktop-mt1m160 \
--to=idris.hamid@colostate.edu \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).