From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/26646 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nico Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: mml Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:44:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <441F2177.9060005@wxs.nl> <44208780.8000804@wxs.nl> <44212554.4090707@wxs.nl> <4423B5A0.9060408@wxs.nl> <4425381B.20900@wxs.nl> <4426D571.5070302@wxs.nl> <4427D9D7.7020306@wxs.nl> <4429022A.2040302@wxs.nl> <442A965E.6020205@wxs.nl> <442B9458.30307@elvenkind.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1143740553 3465 80.91.229.2 (30 Mar 2006 17:42:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Mar 30 19:42:31 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FP19u-0006nU-HR for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:42:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC611279C; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:42:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14615-04; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:42:05 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA2C127A0; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:42:05 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0AF127A0 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:42:05 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14860-01-3 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:42:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from swip.net (mailfe05.tele2.fr [212.247.154.140]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E7831279D for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:42:03 +0200 (CEST) X-T2-Posting-ID: 3brHPWvyEzVNt0QNlxQWsxGJRDYe7rueGgqwO1zxZAg= X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] Original-Received: from [83.179.9.24] (HELO localhost) by mailfe05.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 69387687 for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:42:03 +0200 Original-To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" In-Reply-To: <442B9458.30307@elvenkind.com> User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54 (FreeBSD, build 955) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:26646 Archived-At: On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:18:32 +0200, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > Hi nico/Hans, > > Hans Hagen wrote: >>> ¯ > > The MathML spec specifically suggests the use of ‾ instead > of a literal accent character in situations like this. The problem is that it is also specified to which unicode character is mapped the entity (http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/isodia.html). Actually ‾ is U00AF. So, the behaviour should not be different when using an entity name and the corresponding unicode value. Imagine some XML tool processing an original XML mathml code containing an entity name, and simply expanding the entity according the MathML DTD. I think that processing the original and the expanded code should give the same result. Of course, using entity names instead of unicode values is better for readibility and maintanability, but IMHO it is not a solution to the question. Regards, BG