From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/30620 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nico Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: listoffloats question Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 18:32:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <44F84E39.50506@mevis.de> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1157128000 12610 80.91.229.2 (1 Sep 2006 16:26:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 16:26:40 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Sep 01 18:26:37 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GJBqY-000283-5g for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 18:26:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C441FCE4; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 18:26:20 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06768-01; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 18:26:14 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960C21FCCE; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 18:26:13 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D841FCCE for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 18:26:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05456-03-2 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 18:26:09 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from swip.net (mailfe04.tele2.fr [212.247.154.108]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 3ED2B1FCB1 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 18:26:09 +0200 (CEST) X-T2-Posting-ID: 3brHPWvyEzVNt0QNlxQWsxGJRDYe7rueGgqwO1zxZAg= X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] Original-Received: from [83.177.237.75] (HELO localhost) by mailfe04.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 268523029 for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 18:26:08 +0200 Original-To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" In-Reply-To: <44F84E39.50506@mevis.de> User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54 (FreeBSD, build 955) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:30620 Archived-At: On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 17:14:01 +0200, richard rascher-friesenhausen wrote: > Hello, > > in my scripts i use different kinds of figure, defined as floats cloned > from the original ConTeXt figure: > > \definefloat[afigure][afigures][figure] > \definefloat[bfigure][bfigures][figure] > > In my script environment i use different setups for figure, afigure and > bfigure that are not shown here. > Using cloning, all figures use the same counter, which is nice. Really? In which release the counter is the same? With your case, I have here the figure numbers 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2. Regards, BG