From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/20390 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Otared Kavian Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Presentation Styles Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 00:40:43 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200505161419.j4GEJnaN012623@mailrelay02.solcon.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1116283781 10941 80.91.229.2 (16 May 2005 22:49:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 22:49:41 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue May 17 00:49:39 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DXoNk-0008QO-Db for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 May 2005 00:48:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280F3127E1; Tue, 17 May 2005 00:48:45 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 03836-04; Tue, 17 May 2005 00:48:44 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB63127B7; Tue, 17 May 2005 00:46:52 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F344127B7 for ; Tue, 17 May 2005 00:46:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 03836-03 for ; Tue, 17 May 2005 00:46:50 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp1.wanadoo.fr (smtp1.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.30]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C621276F for ; Tue, 17 May 2005 00:46:50 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0112.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 405711C00610 for ; Tue, 17 May 2005 00:46:50 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [10.0.1.121] (AMontsouris-151-1-9-184.w82-123.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.123.134.184]) by mwinf0112.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5849F1C0060A for ; Tue, 17 May 2005 00:46:49 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050516224649361.5849F1C0060A@mwinf0112.wanadoo.fr X-Sender: otared@pop.wanadoo.fr (Unverified) In-Reply-To: <200505161419.j4GEJnaN012623@mailrelay02.solcon.nl> Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on smtp.ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:20390 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:20390 At 16:19 +0200 16/05/05, M.guravage wrote: >Hello, > >I recently prepared a presentation using pre-05. The Topics, represented as >buttons in a column on the left, are now each preceeded by a number. This >was not the case when I last used the style back in January. Interestingly, >s-pre-05.tex has not changed since then. This behavior is the same on both >the latest ConTeXt alpha and beta releases. > >I'd appreciate it very much if anyone could shed some light on why these >numbers are appearing. Hello, I tried your example file (by the way I had to change \usemodule[pre-04] into \usemodule[pre-05] according to what you wanted). Indeed something has changed since the page number at which each \Topic appears, is repeated before the buttons in the interaction menu. I tried your file with other versions of s-pre-05.tex (I mean those I had in my archives, one of them being from 2003, another from 2004): the result is the same... Something has changed maybe in s-pre-00.tex? Since I don't know how the page number is called I couldn't locate the bug. Sorry for this :-( Best regards: OK