ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Define new symbol by stitching two symbols together
@ 2021-05-22 18:23 Nicola
  2021-05-23 10:00 ` Hans Hagen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nicola @ 2021-05-22 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ntg-context

I would like to define new symbols by stitching together existing
glyphs. This is what I have come up so far:

    \define[1]\Transition{-\!\![#1]\!\!\rightarrow}
    \starttext
    \m{L\Transition{A}R}
    \stoptext

This should render as -[ ]->, ideally with no space between the dash or
the arrow and the brackets, i.e., -[ should appear like a single glyph;
ditto for ]-->. With the definition above, however, the space is
variable, and in some circumstances the gliphs overlap.

How can I improve the above definition?

Nicola

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Define new symbol by stitching two symbols together
  2021-05-22 18:23 Define new symbol by stitching two symbols together Nicola
@ 2021-05-23 10:00 ` Hans Hagen
  2021-05-24 19:46   ` Aditya Mahajan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2021-05-23 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users, Nicola

On 5/22/2021 8:23 PM, Nicola wrote:
> I would like to define new symbols by stitching together existing
> glyphs. This is what I have come up so far:
> 
>      \define[1]\Transition{-\!\![#1]\!\!\rightarrow}
>      \starttext
>      \m{L\Transition{A}R}
>      \stoptext
> 
> This should render as -[ ]->, ideally with no space between the dash or
> the arrow and the brackets, i.e., -[ should appear like a single glyph;
> ditto for ]-->. With the definition above, however, the space is
> variable, and in some circumstances the gliphs overlap.
> 
> How can I improve the above definition?
don't use these funny \! skips ... use some font related metric:

     \define[1]\Transition{-\kern-1ex[#1]\kern-1.1ex\rightarrow}
     \starttext
     \m{L\Transition{A}R}
     \stoptext



-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
        tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Define new symbol by stitching two symbols together
  2021-05-23 10:00 ` Hans Hagen
@ 2021-05-24 19:46   ` Aditya Mahajan
  2021-05-24 20:14     ` Nicola
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Aditya Mahajan @ 2021-05-24 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users; +Cc: Nicola

On Sun, 23 May 2021, Hans Hagen wrote:

> On 5/22/2021 8:23 PM, Nicola wrote:
> > I would like to define new symbols by stitching together existing
> > glyphs. This is what I have come up so far:
> > 
> >      \define[1]\Transition{-\!\![#1]\!\!\rightarrow}
> >      \starttext
> >      \m{L\Transition{A}R}
> >      \stoptext
> > 
> > This should render as -[ ]->, ideally with no space between the dash or
> > the arrow and the brackets, i.e., -[ should appear like a single glyph;
> > ditto for ]-->. With the definition above, however, the space is
> > variable, and in some circumstances the gliphs overlap.
> > 
> > How can I improve the above definition?
> don't use these funny \! skips ... use some font related metric:
> 
>      \define[1]\Transition{-\kern-1ex[#1]\kern-1.1ex\rightarrow}

This is how we used to define arrows in the old days ...

\define[1]\Transition{\relbar\joinrel\mathrel{[}#1\mathrel{]}\joinrel\rightarrow}
\define[1]\BigTransition{\relbar\joinrel\relbar\joinrel\mathrel{[}#1\mathrel{]}\joinrel\relbar\joinrel\rightarrow}

\starttext
\m{L\Transition{A}R}

\m{L\BigTransition{A}R}
\stoptext

Aditya



___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Define new symbol by stitching two symbols together
  2021-05-24 19:46   ` Aditya Mahajan
@ 2021-05-24 20:14     ` Nicola
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nicola @ 2021-05-24 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ntg-context

On 2021-05-24, Aditya Mahajan <adityam@umich.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 May 2021, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>> On 5/22/2021 8:23 PM, Nicola wrote:
>> > I would like to define new symbols by stitching together existing
>> > glyphs. This is what I have come up so far:
>> >
>> >      \define[1]\Transition{-\!\![#1]\!\!\rightarrow}
>> >      \starttext
>> >      \m{L\Transition{A}R}
>> >      \stoptext
>> >
>> > This should render as -[ ]->, ideally with no space between the dash or
>> > the arrow and the brackets, i.e., -[ should appear like a single glyph;
>> > ditto for ]-->. With the definition above, however, the space is
>> > variable, and in some circumstances the gliphs overlap.
>> >
>> > How can I improve the above definition?
>> don't use these funny \! skips ... use some font related metric:
>>
>>      \define[1]\Transition{-\kern-1ex[#1]\kern-1.1ex\rightarrow}
>
> This is how we used to define arrows in the old days ...
>
> \define[1]\Transition{\relbar\joinrel\mathrel{[}#1\mathrel{]}\joinrel\rightarrow}
> \define[1]\BigTransition{\relbar\joinrel\relbar\joinrel\mathrel{[}#1\mathrel{]}\joinrel\relbar\joinrel\rightarrow}
>
> \starttext
> \m{L\Transition{A}R}
>
> \m{L\BigTransition{A}R}
> \stoptext

Thanks Hans, Aditya,

combining your ideas (\joinrel plus \kern) seems to work best for my use
case.

Nicola

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-05-24 20:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-05-22 18:23 Define new symbol by stitching two symbols together Nicola
2021-05-23 10:00 ` Hans Hagen
2021-05-24 19:46   ` Aditya Mahajan
2021-05-24 20:14     ` Nicola

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).