From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/891 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ecashin@coe.uga.edu (Ed L. Cashin) Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: text vs command at end of itemize Date: 10 Sep 1999 21:49:48 -0400 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035391729 28004 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 16:48:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ConTeXt mailing list Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:891 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:891 I've noticed a strange effect at the end of an itemized list. Beginning the line that follows the list with a command seems to conflict with the "after" option: \setupwhitespace[medium] \setupindenting[medium] \def\trademark{\low{{\tfxx(TM)}}} \setupitemize[each][2*broad][before=\blank,after=\blank] \starttext Taking ``foo'' out of the sentence below the list breaks the \type{[after=\blank]} option from \type{\setupindenting}. \startitemize[n,packed] \item Goretex\trademark \item Get windproof fleece \item[nomotion1] Avoid windy areas and/or motion relative to the surrounding air \stopitemize foo \in{Item}[nomotion1] is a bit hard to accomplish. \midaligned{{\it --vs.--}} \startitemize[n,packed] \item Goretex\trademark \item Get windproof fleece \item[nomotion2] Avoid windy areas and/or motion relative to the surrounding air \stopitemize \in{Item}[nomotion2] is a bit hard to accomplish. \stoptext -- --Ed Cashin ecashin@coe.uga.edu