From: "Thomas Schmitz" <tschmit1@uni-bonn.de>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Ideas for restructuring the ConTeXt garden?
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:00:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <web-6661372@be2.uni-bonn.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110312233554.GB25891@houseag.com>
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 15:35:54 -0800
Henry House <hajhouse@hajhouse.org> wrote:
>
> I strongly agree that sample set-up code (ideally
>well-commented so that
> it also serves as a tutorial of sorts) to reproduce the
>style of LaTeX
> would be helpful. The appearance of LaTeX documents
>isn't perfect but it
> produces reasonably high-quality results suitable for
>complex technical
> documents right out of the box of the box without any
>tweaking, whereas
> ConTeXt requires (at least it did for me) some trouble
>to set it up for
> the first time. To some extent this is not because of
>the merit of the
> LaTeX design itself but the fact that it is familiar and
>therefore
> highly readable to someone used to reading it. It is
>also the point of
> departure for a LaTeX user wanting to convert to using
>ConTeXt; hence, i
> would imagine many such people would prefer to tweak a
>LaTeX-like
> document appearance to better suit their needs rather
>than starting with
> something quite different. Certainly, this was the case
>for me; being
> basically satisfied with my LaTeX documents but wanting
>more control and
> the option to use the advanced features of ConTeXt.
>Having sample set-up
> code that emulated LaTeX would have eased the initial
>transition for me.
>
Pardon my French, but this thread is getting less and less
useful, probably because it addresses too many issues at a
time. It is rapidly degenerating from a "how to
restructure the garden" into a "things I wish others would
do so my life becomes easier." If someone says "I added a
section to the wiki which explains which ConTeXt settings
will give a document equivalent to LaTeX XXX class," fine
- I would consider this superfluous, but it may help some
people. But even strongly agreeing that somebody else
should write a tutorial isn't getting any work done. And
the assumption that most or all ConTeXt users are, at
their heart, LaTeX renegades is not true, I think. Many
advanced users haven't used LaTeX ever or in a long time
and wouldn't want to waste their time on learning it just
for the sake of such a comparison.
Sorry for being so blunt, but I think this will be more
helpful if we stay focussed.
Thomas
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-13 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-12 23:35 Henry House
2011-03-13 7:54 ` Taco Hoekwater
2011-03-13 9:00 ` Thomas Schmitz [this message]
2011-03-13 11:43 ` "latex style" (was : Re: Ideas for restructuring the ConTeXt garden?) Peter Münster
2011-03-13 20:34 ` Ideas for restructuring the ConTeXt garden? Aditya Mahajan
2011-03-14 0:07 ` Alasdair McAndrew
2011-03-14 3:12 ` Aditya Mahajan
2011-03-14 10:42 ` Philipp Gesang
2011-03-14 3:32 ` mathew
2011-03-14 4:21 ` Alasdair McAndrew
2011-03-14 4:54 ` Aditya Mahajan
2011-03-14 6:33 ` Alasdair McAndrew
2011-03-14 7:07 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2011-03-14 9:17 ` Martin Schröder
2011-03-14 10:43 ` Alasdair McAndrew
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-03-10 14:38 \setuppublications problem Jean Magnan de Bornier
2011-03-11 12:00 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2011-03-12 7:37 ` Jean Magnan de Bornier
2011-03-12 10:09 ` Thomas Schmitz
2011-03-12 10:45 ` Florian Wobbe
2011-03-12 11:08 ` Thomas Schmitz
2011-03-12 12:21 ` Ideas for restructuring the ConTeXt garden? Florian Wobbe
2011-03-12 13:05 ` Marco
2011-03-12 14:08 ` Mojca Miklavec
2011-03-12 16:20 ` Procházka Lukáš
2011-03-12 20:02 ` Jaroslav Hajtmar
2011-03-12 20:08 ` C.
2011-03-12 23:04 ` Pontus Lurcock
2011-03-14 7:46 ` Taco Hoekwater
2011-03-14 20:26 ` Mojca Miklavec
2011-03-14 21:15 ` mathew
2011-03-13 7:01 ` Vnpenguin
2011-03-13 4:48 ` mathew
2011-03-13 5:03 ` Pontus Lurcock
2011-03-13 6:25 ` luigi scarso
2011-03-14 13:04 ` Carlos Breton Besnier
2011-03-14 15:16 ` Carlos Breton Besnier
2011-03-16 12:37 ` Vedran Miletić
2011-04-26 10:27 ` Ian Lawrence
2011-03-14 15:17 ` Carlos Breton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=web-6661372@be2.uni-bonn.de \
--to=tschmit1@uni-bonn.de \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).