Re: Do Pandoc's conversion functions which exist in both directions guarantee/aim for bijectivity?

["christi...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" <christian.kolen-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1021 bytes --]

There’s actually lots of info about this. Pandoc is not even idempotent, 
let alone bijective.

So no, you cannot depend on this especially if you want to convert it back 
and forth a lot of times.

On Monday, May 3, 2021 at 3:23:12 PM UTC-7 Jeffrey Wang wrote:

> I was not able to find any concrete information establishing the answer to 
> this question. I ask this to see how much I can depend on using Pandoc for 
> an application that would convert back and forth between two formats, one 
> for storage/authoritative purposes and the other for rendering/display 
> purposes. Thanks!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/0b756db2-f247-49b1-a7dd-e0242e79d956n%40googlegroups.com.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1513 bytes --]