public inbox archive for pandoc-discuss@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederik Elwert <frederik.elwert-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: pandoc-discuss <pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: All entries in `references` are listed in bibliography, not only the cited ones
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 04:44:26 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12103c9c-602d-4f60-b699-471dcbceb1dfn@googlegroups.com> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1617 bytes --]

Hello everybody,

when upgrading pandoc in our publication workflow (2.9→2.13), and thus 
switching from pandoc-citeproc to citeproc, we noticed a change in 
behaviour:

We are converting all references authors send us to csl-yaml and embedd 
them within the markdown file through the `references` metadata variable.

Previously, only those entries that were actually cited also got printed in 
the bibliography. That’s what we expected. Now, with citeproc, we find that 
*all* entries from the `references` list are printed in the bibliography. 
This is different from taking the same entries, putting them in an external 
bibtex file, and include them with the `bibliography` metadata key. If we 
do that, we get the old behaviour.

So in sum, `references` now behaves like `bibliography` + `nocite: @*`.

Is this the new intended behaviour, or is this a bug/regression?

(For us, the older behaviour worked better, because often authors have 
additional entries in their bibliography, against the guidelines. The old 
behaviour made sure we only include those that are actually cited. Now we 
have to check the references list manually.)

Thanks in advance,
Frederik

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/12103c9c-602d-4f60-b699-471dcbceb1dfn%40googlegroups.com.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2060 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2021-06-11 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-11 11:44 Frederik Elwert [this message]
     [not found] ` <12103c9c-602d-4f60-b699-471dcbceb1dfn-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
2021-06-11 12:42   ` 'Nick Bart' via pandoc-discuss
2021-06-11 20:34     ` fiddlosopher
     [not found]       ` <71de154c-86eb-440f-9abd-2b427a91fa99n-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
2021-06-12 10:56         ` 'Nick Bart' via pandoc-discuss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12103c9c-602d-4f60-b699-471dcbceb1dfn@googlegroups.com \
    --to=frederik.elwert-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).