pandoc convert latex to jats Could not load include file

pandoc convert latex to jats Could not load include file

[幻世子衍]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 35634 bytes --]

The full log:

pandoc -f latex -t jats_archiving  main.tex --resource-path=. --verbose
[INFO] Could not load include file extsizes.sty at template.tex line 1 
column 28
[INFO] Could not load include file multicol.sty at template.tex line 3 
column 22
[INFO] Could not load include file amsmath.sty at template.tex line 4 
column 21
[INFO] Could not load include file color.sty at template.tex line 6 column 
19
[INFO] Could not load include file xcolor.sty at template.tex line 7 column 
22
[INFO] Could not load include file hyperref.sty at template.tex line 8 
column 62
[INFO] Could not load include file titlesec.sty at template.tex line 10 
column 22
[INFO] Could not load include file authblk.sty at template.tex line 11 
column 21
[INFO] Skipped '\definecolor{sectiontitlecolor}{rgb}{0.2,0.4,0.8}' at 
template.tex line 14 column 50
[INFO] Skipped '\definecolor{editorial}{rgb}{0.08,0.28,0.53}' at 
template.tex line 15 column 45
[INFO] Skipped '\definecolor{cite}{rgb}{0.98,0.9,0.8}' at template.tex line 
16 column 38
[INFO] Could not load include file url.sty at template.tex line 19 column 17
[INFO] Could not load include file lipsum.sty at template.tex line 23 
column 20
[INFO] Could not load include file geometry.sty at template.tex line 25 
column 63
[INFO] Skipped '\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}' at template.tex line 28 column 25
[INFO] Could not load include file fancyhdr.sty at main.tex line 9 column 23
[INFO] Skipped '\pagestyle{fancy}' at main.tex line 12 column 18
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyhf{}' at main.tex line 15 column 11
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyhead[L]{\textbf{Translational Pediatrics, Vol 12, No 
8 August 2023 }}' at main.tex line 18 column 76
[INFO] Skipped '\setcounter{page}{1450}' at main.tex line 23 column 24
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyhead[R]{\textbf{\thepage}}' at main.tex line 25 
column 33
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyfoot[L]{© Translational Pediatrics. All rights 
reserved. }' at main.tex line 33 column 65
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyfoot[R]{Transl Pediatr 2023;12(8):1450-1453 | 
https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-264 }' at main.tex line 34 column 92
[INFO] Skipped '\thispagestyle{empty}' at main.tex line 40 column 22
[INFO] Skipped '\makeatletter' at main.tex line 43 column 14
[INFO] Skipped '\makeatother' at main.tex line 45 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\makeatletter' at main.tex line 47 column 14
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent' at main.tex line 102 column 14
[INFO] Skipped '\makebox[0.3\linewidth][l]{%
      \setlength{\parskip}{1em} % 设置段落间距
      \setlength{\parindent}{1em} % 设置段落缩进
      \textcolor{white}{Editorial}
      }' at main.tex line 106 column 6
[INFO] Skipped '\bgroup' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\LARGE' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\LARGE' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\@title' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\begin{flushleft}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\end{flushleft}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\@author' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\begin{flushleft}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\end{flushleft}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 134 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{\textit{Correspondence to:} Frank-Martin Haecker, 
MD, Professor of Pediatric Surgery. Chest Wall Unit at the Department of 
Pediatric Surgery, Children’s
  Hospital of Eastern Switzerland, Claudiusstrasse 6, CH-9006 St. Gallen, 
Switzerland. Email: frank-martin.haecker-kpaEHHRHYO5yDzI6CaY1VQ@public.gmane.org}' at main.tex line 140 
column 125
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{\textit{Comment on}: Scalise PN, Demehri FR. The 
management of pectus excavatum in pediatric patients: a narrative review. 
Transl Pediatr 2023;12:208-20.}' at main.tex line 142 column 149
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 144 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{\textbf{\textcolor[RGB]{21,72,135}{Keywords:}} 
Pectus excavatum; pediatric patients; Nuss procedure; vacuum bell; 
cryoablation}' at main.tex line 145 column 95
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 147 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{Submitted Apr 26, 2023. Accepted for publication 
Jul 19, 2023. Published online Jul 28, 2023}' at main.tex line 149 column 99
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{doi: 10.21037/tp-23-264}' at main.tex line 151 
column 29
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{\textbf{View this article at: }}' at main.tex 
line 153 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{4ex}' at main.tex line 155 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\indent ' at main.tex line 159 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\indent ' at main.tex line 159 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\indent ' at main.tex line 159 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\indent ' at main.tex line 159 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\normalfont' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\Large' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\normalfont' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\Large' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{1ex}' at main.tex line 322 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 329 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 336 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\begin{multicols}{2}
      {
      \indent The majority of congenital chest wall deformities (CWD)
  affects the anterior chest wall. The most common anterior
  CWD is pectus excavatum (PE), followed by Pectus
  carinatum (PC). The incidence of PE is approximately
  1 in every 300–400 births, affecting male patients with
  an approx. 4:1 ratio (\cite{pmid36891368}). For the last 70 to 80 years, 
open
  surgical repair such as the Ravitch technique and its
  modifications (\cite{pmid35820596,pmid35455522}) was the preferred method 
to correct
  CWDs. An essential paradigm shift occurred with the
  inauguration of the minimally invasive repair of pectus
  excavatum (MIRPE) by Nuss (\cite{pmid35377161}). In contrast to open
  repair, MIRPE does not require cartilage or sternal
  resection. Flexibility and elasticity of the chest wall which
  are preserved applying MIRPE, were identified as relevant
  parameters for successful treatment of CWD. Furthermore,
  an increasing number of patients presented with thoracic
  chondrodystrophy as a long-term side effect after open
  surgical repair. As a consequence, the management of CWD
  including diagnostic work-up as well as conservative and
  surgical treatment options has made substantial progress
  during the past two decades. Today, treatment of CWD
  includes all age groups with pediatric, adolescent and adult
  patients, covered by a dedicated multidisciplinary team
  (in particular pediatric and thoracic surgeons) based in a
  specialized chest wall unit, what is the most important pillar
  of present time.
  The physiologic effects of CWD are still discussed
  controversially. There is an ongoing controversial debate
  concerning effects of MIRPE on exercise tolerance, lack
  of endurance, shortness of breath, cardiopulmonary
  function, body posture, etc. Even if the number of articles
  reporting on different aspects of CWD treatment went
  up from approximately 300 (1980 to 1989) to more than
  1,000 published papers (2012 to 2021), the controversial
  debate will continue (\cite{pmid34942673}). Information on new diagnostic
  and therapeutic modalities provided by online platforms
  and social media circulates not only among surgeons
  and paediatricians, but also rapidly among patients. Not
  only different surgical techniques, but also conservative
  treatment options are available. In almost the same manner,
  postoperative pain management is an important part of
  an effective and successful treatment protocol. Several
  modifications were introduced over the past years. For a
  long time, regional analgesia such as paravertebral nerve
  blocks or catheters, epidurals as well as patient-controlled
  analgesia (PCA) represented the preferred anesthesia
  method. Nowadays, cryoablation became a more and
  more applied alternative technique (\cite{pmid33853733,pmid32753276}). 
Cryoablation
  may be applied thoracoscopically during MIRPE (\cite{pmid31600804}), or as
  ultrasound guided percutaneous intercostal injection 
(\cite{pmid31199434}).
  After its introduction, MIRPE was well established
  in the first decade of this century and subsequently
  performed with increasing frequency worldwide. Today,
  MIRPE represents the worldwide used “gold-standard”
  for surgical repair of PE. Applying the technique in
  different age groups, the method experienced numerous
  modifications. Modifications include patient selection
  and indication, preoperative evaluation, as well as age
  at time of surgical repair. Positioning of the patient on
  the OR table, intubation (single lumen vs. double lumen
  tubus) were modified. Number, location and size of skin
  incisions, shape/size or number of bars and bar fixation as
  well as bar passage (intra vs. extrapleural placement) were
  modified (\cite{pmid29672193}). To reduce the risk of secondary bar
  displacement and/or to correct complex CWDs, placement
  of more than 1 bar including the so called cross-bar
  technique was introduced (\cite{pmid28822540}).

  Two fundamental techniques were introduced to reduce
  the risk of intraoperative cardiac injuries: routine unilateral
  and/or bilateral thoracoscopy (\cite{pmid25814003}), and routine sternal
  elevation (\cite{pmid18582824,pmid11877663}). Whereas in the initial 
publication by
  Nuss retrosternal dissection was described as “blunt” using
  a long-curved clamp without thoracoscopy (4), the same
  group reported their experience using routine thoracoscopy
  4 years later, achieving improved safety during mediastinal
  dissection (\cite{pmid10803339}). In particular the risk of cardiac 
perforation
  as the most severe complication could be decreased with
  the routine use of thoracoscopic guidance (\cite{pmid9574749}). Even
  more than 2 decades after its introduction there is no
  evidence-based data available concerning the protective
  effect of thoracoscopy on the true incidence of near fatal
  complications like cardiac injuries. However, the majority of
  articles and studies reporting on catastrophic complications
  were all published before 2011 (5). Furthermore, the
  widespread use of routine intraoperative sternal elevation
  must be considered as an additional effective measure
  to improve safety of MIRPE (13).

  Visualization across
  the mediastinum during retrosternal dissection may be
  compromised in severe defects. Notably in older adult PE
  patients, decreased flexibility and stiffness of the anterior
  chest wall as well as the corresponding force required
  to elevate the sternum may make retrosternal dissection
  difficult and sometimes nearby impossible. Applying routine
  sternal elevation during MIRPE, the safety of the procedure
  has improved clearly as there was no near-fatal and/or fatal
  incident reported anymore when the technique was applied
  intraoperatively (13).
  Evolution in the management of congenital CWD and
  modifications of newly introduced techniques have made
  significant progress over the past 2–3 decades, and as a
  consequence patients outcome improved substantially.
  The aim of the narrative review presented by Scalise and
  Demehri (\cite{pmid18582824}) is to outline current practice concerning
  diagnostic work-up, conservative and surgical treatment
  as well as management in general of pediatric PE patients.
  Since we may find numerous publications dealing with this
  topic, it is nearby impossible to review all the literature,
  covering all different age groups. In particular no
  randomized double-blind studies are available. Therefore,
  the quality of evidence regarding this topic remains
  relatively low with still many unexplored and unknown
  pathways. Different objective criteria were screened, verified
  and added to identify PE patients that would benefit from
  surgery. An increasing number of studies accentuating the
  cardiopulmonary consequences of PE. Notably, more than
  275 papers have been published in the last 10 years focusing
  on functional changes prior to and after surgical correction
  of PE. Due to different reasons (e.g., retrospective and/or
  small cohort studies), the results are still heterogenous and
  of low evidential quality (\cite{pmid18582824}). Based on this generally 
poor
  evidence, the controversial debate on the cardiopulmonary
  impact of PE and whether patients may benefit from
  surgical repair or not will continue as long as we may be
  able to provide double blind randomized studies. However,
  IRB approval for such a study has to be considered as
  difficult or nearby impossible. This is aggravated by the
  fact that PE is many times considered as an “only” esthetic
  disorder and in particular associated with body image
  disturbances. In contrast, among surgeons and confirmed
  by recently published studies it is clearly acknowledged
  that subjective improvement in exercise intolerance is
  often reported after MIRPE (\cite{pmid18582824}). Thus, despite above
  mentioned facts as well as current believes, reviews such as
  presented by Scalise and Demehri may help to bridge the
  lack of convincing high-quality evidence which remains a
  critical concern that could potentially interfere with future
  management of PE. As concluded by Scalise and Demehri
  in their narrative review, there is still a lack of international
  consensus guidelines concerning preoperative diagnostic
  work-up, conservative and surgical treatment as well as
  postoperative management. A recently published study
  by Janssen et al. reported on a consensus statement for
  perioperative care for PE based on a multi-round Delphi
  survey (\cite{pmid18582824}). Pectus surgeons all around the world are
  encouraged to draw up standardized consensus guidelines to
  establish a high-level algorithm for preoperative diagnostic
  protocol, indications for conservative and/or surgical
  treatment as well as postoperative management.
      }

     \amesection{Acknowledgments}

     Funding: None.

     \amesection{Footnot}

     \textit{Provenance and Peer Review:} This article was commissioned
  by the editorial office, Translational Pediatrics. The article
  did not undergo external peer review.

      \vspace{1ex}

      \textit{Conflicts of Interest: }The author has completed the ICMJE
      uniform disclosure form (available at \url{https://tp.amegroups.
      com/article/view/10.21037/tp-23-264/coif} ). The author has
      no conflicts of interest to declare.

      \vspace{2ex}

      \textit{Ethical Statement:} The author is accountable for all
  aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related
  to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are
  appropriately investigated and resolved.

      \vspace{2ex}

      \textit{Open Access Statement:} This is an Open Access article
  distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons
  Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International
  License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-
  commercial replication and distribution of the article with
  the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the
  original work is properly cited (including links to both the
  formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license).
  See: 
\href{https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0}{https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0}

  Let's cite! Einstein's journal paper and Dirac's book \cite{dirac} are 
physics-related items.


      \titleformat{\section}
        {\color{sectiontitlecolor}\normalfont\Large\bfseries}
        {\thesection}{1em}{}

      \bibliographystyle{unsrt}
      \bibliography{main}




      % 
\cite{pmid18582824,pmid10803339,pmid9574749,pmid35455522,pmid31600804,pmid29672193,pmid33853733,pmid34942673,pmid35820596,pmid25814003,pmid31199434,pmid32753276,pmid11877663,pmid28822540,pmid36891368,pmid35377161}

      % 在文中插入引用信息
  \noindent\colorbox{cite}{
  % \begin{minipage}{\dimexpr\textwidth-2\fboxsep} %单栏模式
  \begin{minipage}{\dimexpr0.5\textwidth-2\fboxsep}
      \setlength{\parskip}{0em} % 设置段落间距
      \setlength{\parindent}{0em} % 设置段落缩进
      Cite this article as: Haecker FM. Evolution in the management of 
pectus excavatum in pediatric patients. Transl Pediatr 
2023;12(8):1450-1453. doi: 10.21037/tp-23-264

  \end{minipage}}

  \end{multicols}' at main.tex line 157 column 22
<p> <styled-content style="background-color: editorial">
</styled-content> </p>
<boxed-text>
  <p><bold></bold></p>
</boxed-text>
<boxed-text>
  <p><bold></bold></p>
</boxed-text>
<p>https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-264</p>
root@983a0296ac13:/usr/src/app/server/files/0976f9f8-c926-4d7b-afc2-ea95fbc7d486/store# 
pandoc -f latex -t jats_archiving  main.tex 
--resource-path=/usr/src/app/server/files/0976f9f8-c926-4d7b-afc2-ea95fbc7d486/store 
--verbose
[INFO] Could not load include file extsizes.sty at template.tex line 1 
column 28
[INFO] Could not load include file multicol.sty at template.tex line 3 
column 22
[INFO] Could not load include file amsmath.sty at template.tex line 4 
column 21
[INFO] Could not load include file color.sty at template.tex line 6 column 
19
[INFO] Could not load include file xcolor.sty at template.tex line 7 column 
22
[INFO] Could not load include file hyperref.sty at template.tex line 8 
column 62
[INFO] Could not load include file titlesec.sty at template.tex line 10 
column 22
[INFO] Could not load include file authblk.sty at template.tex line 11 
column 21
[INFO] Skipped '\definecolor{sectiontitlecolor}{rgb}{0.2,0.4,0.8}' at 
template.tex line 14 column 50
[INFO] Skipped '\definecolor{editorial}{rgb}{0.08,0.28,0.53}' at 
template.tex line 15 column 45
[INFO] Skipped '\definecolor{cite}{rgb}{0.98,0.9,0.8}' at template.tex line 
16 column 38
[INFO] Could not load include file url.sty at template.tex line 19 column 17
[INFO] Could not load include file lipsum.sty at template.tex line 23 
column 20
[INFO] Could not load include file geometry.sty at template.tex line 25 
column 63
[INFO] Skipped '\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}' at template.tex line 28 column 25
[INFO] Could not load include file fancyhdr.sty at main.tex line 9 column 23
[INFO] Skipped '\pagestyle{fancy}' at main.tex line 12 column 18
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyhf{}' at main.tex line 15 column 11
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyhead[L]{\textbf{Translational Pediatrics, Vol 12, No 
8 August 2023 }}' at main.tex line 18 column 76
[INFO] Skipped '\setcounter{page}{1450}' at main.tex line 23 column 24
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyhead[R]{\textbf{\thepage}}' at main.tex line 25 
column 33
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyfoot[L]{© Translational Pediatrics. All rights 
reserved. }' at main.tex line 33 column 65
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyfoot[R]{Transl Pediatr 2023;12(8):1450-1453 | 
https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-264 }' at main.tex line 34 column 92
[INFO] Skipped '\thispagestyle{empty}' at main.tex line 40 column 22
[INFO] Skipped '\makeatletter' at main.tex line 43 column 14
[INFO] Skipped '\makeatother' at main.tex line 45 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\makeatletter' at main.tex line 47 column 14
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent' at main.tex line 102 column 14
[INFO] Skipped '\makebox[0.3\linewidth][l]{%
      \setlength{\parskip}{1em} % 设置段落间距
      \setlength{\parindent}{1em} % 设置段落缩进
      \textcolor{white}{Editorial}
      }' at main.tex line 106 column 6
[INFO] Skipped '\bgroup' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\LARGE' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\LARGE' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\@title' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\begin{flushleft}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\end{flushleft}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\@author' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\begin{flushleft}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\end{flushleft}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 134 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{\textit{Correspondence to:} Frank-Martin Haecker, 
MD, Professor of Pediatric Surgery. Chest Wall Unit at the Department of 
Pediatric Surgery, Children’s
  Hospital of Eastern Switzerland, Claudiusstrasse 6, CH-9006 St. Gallen, 
Switzerland. Email: frank-martin.haecker-kpaEHHRHYO5yDzI6CaY1VQ@public.gmane.org}' at main.tex line 140 
column 125
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{\textit{Comment on}: Scalise PN, Demehri FR. The 
management of pectus excavatum in pediatric patients: a narrative review. 
Transl Pediatr 2023;12:208-20.}' at main.tex line 142 column 149
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 144 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{\textbf{\textcolor[RGB]{21,72,135}{Keywords:}} 
Pectus excavatum; pediatric patients; Nuss procedure; vacuum bell; 
cryoablation}' at main.tex line 145 column 95
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 147 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{Submitted Apr 26, 2023. Accepted for publication 
Jul 19, 2023. Published online Jul 28, 2023}' at main.tex line 149 column 99
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{doi: 10.21037/tp-23-264}' at main.tex line 151 
column 29
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{\textbf{View this article at: }}' at main.tex 
line 153 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{4ex}' at main.tex line 155 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\indent ' at main.tex line 159 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\indent ' at main.tex line 159 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\indent ' at main.tex line 159 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\indent ' at main.tex line 159 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\normalfont' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\Large' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\normalfont' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\Large' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{1ex}' at main.tex line 322 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 329 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 336 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\begin{multicols}{2}
      {
      \indent The majority of congenital chest wall deformities (CWD)
  affects the anterior chest wall. The most common anterior
  CWD is pectus excavatum (PE), followed by Pectus
  carinatum (PC). The incidence of PE is approximately
  1 in every 300–400 births, affecting male patients with
  an approx. 4:1 ratio (\cite{pmid36891368}). For the last 70 to 80 years, 
open
  surgical repair such as the Ravitch technique and its
  modifications (\cite{pmid35820596,pmid35455522}) was the preferred method 
to correct
  CWDs. An essential paradigm shift occurred with the
  inauguration of the minimally invasive repair of pectus
  excavatum (MIRPE) by Nuss (\cite{pmid35377161}). In contrast to open
  repair, MIRPE does not require cartilage or sternal
  resection. Flexibility and elasticity of the chest wall which
  are preserved applying MIRPE, were identified as relevant
  parameters for successful treatment of CWD. Furthermore,
  an increasing number of patients presented with thoracic
  chondrodystrophy as a long-term side effect after open
  surgical repair. As a consequence, the management of CWD
  including diagnostic work-up as well as conservative and
  surgical treatment options has made substantial progress
  during the past two decades. Today, treatment of CWD
  includes all age groups with pediatric, adolescent and adult
  patients, covered by a dedicated multidisciplinary team
  (in particular pediatric and thoracic surgeons) based in a
  specialized chest wall unit, what is the most important pillar
  of present time.
  The physiologic effects of CWD are still discussed
  controversially. There is an ongoing controversial debate
  concerning effects of MIRPE on exercise tolerance, lack
  of endurance, shortness of breath, cardiopulmonary
  function, body posture, etc. Even if the number of articles
  reporting on different aspects of CWD treatment went
  up from approximately 300 (1980 to 1989) to more than
  1,000 published papers (2012 to 2021), the controversial
  debate will continue (\cite{pmid34942673}). Information on new diagnostic
  and therapeutic modalities provided by online platforms
  and social media circulates not only among surgeons
  and paediatricians, but also rapidly among patients. Not
  only different surgical techniques, but also conservative
  treatment options are available. In almost the same manner,
  postoperative pain management is an important part of
  an effective and successful treatment protocol. Several
  modifications were introduced over the past years. For a
  long time, regional analgesia such as paravertebral nerve
  blocks or catheters, epidurals as well as patient-controlled
  analgesia (PCA) represented the preferred anesthesia
  method. Nowadays, cryoablation became a more and
  more applied alternative technique (\cite{pmid33853733,pmid32753276}). 
Cryoablation
  may be applied thoracoscopically during MIRPE (\cite{pmid31600804}), or as
  ultrasound guided percutaneous intercostal injection 
(\cite{pmid31199434}).
  After its introduction, MIRPE was well established
  in the first decade of this century and subsequently
  performed with increasing frequency worldwide. Today,
  MIRPE represents the worldwide used “gold-standard”
  for surgical repair of PE. Applying the technique in
  different age groups, the method experienced numerous
  modifications. Modifications include patient selection
  and indication, preoperative evaluation, as well as age
  at time of surgical repair. Positioning of the patient on
  the OR table, intubation (single lumen vs. double lumen
  tubus) were modified. Number, location and size of skin
  incisions, shape/size or number of bars and bar fixation as
  well as bar passage (intra vs. extrapleural placement) were
  modified (\cite{pmid29672193}). To reduce the risk of secondary bar
  displacement and/or to correct complex CWDs, placement
  of more than 1 bar including the so called cross-bar
  technique was introduced (\cite{pmid28822540}).

  Two fundamental techniques were introduced to reduce
  the risk of intraoperative cardiac injuries: routine unilateral
  and/or bilateral thoracoscopy (\cite{pmid25814003}), and routine sternal
  elevation (\cite{pmid18582824,pmid11877663}). Whereas in the initial 
publication by
  Nuss retrosternal dissection was described as “blunt” using
  a long-curved clamp without thoracoscopy (4), the same
  group reported their experience using routine thoracoscopy
  4 years later, achieving improved safety during mediastinal
  dissection (\cite{pmid10803339}). In particular the risk of cardiac 
perforation
  as the most severe complication could be decreased with
  the routine use of thoracoscopic guidance (\cite{pmid9574749}). Even
  more than 2 decades after its introduction there is no
  evidence-based data available concerning the protective
  effect of thoracoscopy on the true incidence of near fatal
  complications like cardiac injuries. However, the majority of
  articles and studies reporting on catastrophic complications
  were all published before 2011 (5). Furthermore, the
  widespread use of routine intraoperative sternal elevation
  must be considered as an additional effective measure
  to improve safety of MIRPE (13).

  Visualization across
  the mediastinum during retrosternal dissection may be
  compromised in severe defects. Notably in older adult PE
  patients, decreased flexibility and stiffness of the anterior
  chest wall as well as the corresponding force required
  to elevate the sternum may make retrosternal dissection
  difficult and sometimes nearby impossible. Applying routine
  sternal elevation during MIRPE, the safety of the procedure
  has improved clearly as there was no near-fatal and/or fatal
  incident reported anymore when the technique was applied
  intraoperatively (13).
  Evolution in the management of congenital CWD and
  modifications of newly introduced techniques have made
  significant progress over the past 2–3 decades, and as a
  consequence patients outcome improved substantially.
  The aim of the narrative review presented by Scalise and
  Demehri (\cite{pmid18582824}) is to outline current practice concerning
  diagnostic work-up, conservative and surgical treatment
  as well as management in general of pediatric PE patients.
  Since we may find numerous publications dealing with this
  topic, it is nearby impossible to review all the literature,
  covering all different age groups. In particular no
  randomized double-blind studies are available. Therefore,
  the quality of evidence regarding this topic remains
  relatively low with still many unexplored and unknown
  pathways. Different objective criteria were screened, verified
  and added to identify PE patients that would benefit from
  surgery. An increasing number of studies accentuating the
  cardiopulmonary consequences of PE. Notably, more than
  275 papers have been published in the last 10 years focusing
  on functional changes prior to and after surgical correction
  of PE. Due to different reasons (e.g., retrospective and/or
  small cohort studies), the results are still heterogenous and
  of low evidential quality (\cite{pmid18582824}). Based on this generally 
poor
  evidence, the controversial debate on the cardiopulmonary
  impact of PE and whether patients may benefit from
  surgical repair or not will continue as long as we may be
  able to provide double blind randomized studies. However,
  IRB approval for such a study has to be considered as
  difficult or nearby impossible. This is aggravated by the
  fact that PE is many times considered as an “only” esthetic
  disorder and in particular associated with body image
  disturbances. In contrast, among surgeons and confirmed
  by recently published studies it is clearly acknowledged
  that subjective improvement in exercise intolerance is
  often reported after MIRPE (\cite{pmid18582824}). Thus, despite above
  mentioned facts as well as current believes, reviews such as
  presented by Scalise and Demehri may help to bridge the
  lack of convincing high-quality evidence which remains a
  critical concern that could potentially interfere with future
  management of PE. As concluded by Scalise and Demehri
  in their narrative review, there is still a lack of international
  consensus guidelines concerning preoperative diagnostic
  work-up, conservative and surgical treatment as well as
  postoperative management. A recently published study
  by Janssen et al. reported on a consensus statement for
  perioperative care for PE based on a multi-round Delphi
  survey (\cite{pmid18582824}). Pectus surgeons all around the world are
  encouraged to draw up standardized consensus guidelines to
  establish a high-level algorithm for preoperative diagnostic
  protocol, indications for conservative and/or surgical
  treatment as well as postoperative management.
      }

     \amesection{Acknowledgments}

     Funding: None.

     \amesection{Footnot}

     \textit{Provenance and Peer Review:} This article was commissioned
  by the editorial office, Translational Pediatrics. The article
  did not undergo external peer review.

      \vspace{1ex}

      \textit{Conflicts of Interest: }The author has completed the ICMJE
      uniform disclosure form (available at \url{https://tp.amegroups.
      com/article/view/10.21037/tp-23-264/coif} ). The author has
      no conflicts of interest to declare.

      \vspace{2ex}

      \textit{Ethical Statement:} The author is accountable for all
  aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related
  to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are
  appropriately investigated and resolved.

      \vspace{2ex}

      \textit{Open Access Statement:} This is an Open Access article
  distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons
  Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International
  License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-
  commercial replication and distribution of the article with
  the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the
  original work is properly cited (including links to both the
  formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license).
  See: 
\href{https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0}{https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0}

  Let's cite! Einstein's journal paper and Dirac's book \cite{dirac} are 
physics-related items.


      \titleformat{\section}
        {\color{sectiontitlecolor}\normalfont\Large\bfseries}
        {\thesection}{1em}{}

      \bibliographystyle{unsrt}
      \bibliography{main}




      % 
\cite{pmid18582824,pmid10803339,pmid9574749,pmid35455522,pmid31600804,pmid29672193,pmid33853733,pmid34942673,pmid35820596,pmid25814003,pmid31199434,pmid32753276,pmid11877663,pmid28822540,pmid36891368,pmid35377161}

      % 在文中插入引用信息
  \noindent\colorbox{cite}{
  % \begin{minipage}{\dimexpr\textwidth-2\fboxsep} %单栏模式
  \begin{minipage}{\dimexpr0.5\textwidth-2\fboxsep}
      \setlength{\parskip}{0em} % 设置段落间距
      \setlength{\parindent}{0em} % 设置段落缩进
      Cite this article as: Haecker FM. Evolution in the management of 
pectus excavatum in pediatric patients. Transl Pediatr 
2023;12(8):1450-1453. doi: 10.21037/tp-23-264

  \end{minipage}}

  \end{multicols}' at main.tex line 157 column 22
<p> <styled-content style="background-color: editorial">
</styled-content> </p>
<boxed-text>
  <p><bold></bold></p>
</boxed-text>
<boxed-text>
  <p><bold></bold></p>
</boxed-text>
<p>https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-264</p>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/3c2fb287-b431-4d22-9c75-04922cdd572fn%40googlegroups.com.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 38883 bytes --]

Re: pandoc convert latex to jats Could not load include file

[John MacFarlane]

These are harmless and expected.

They just indicate that pandoc is not finding and parsing the style files you're loading. It's not really expected that it would (and in many cases it couldn't, because these have too much low-level TeX).



> On Nov 22, 2023, at 1:15 AM, 幻世子衍 <unrealyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> The full log:
> 
> pandoc -f latex -t jats_archiving  main.tex --resource-path=. --verbose
> [INFO] Could not load include file extsizes.sty at template.tex line 1 column 28
> [INFO] Could not load include file multicol.sty at template.tex line 3 column 22
> [INFO] Could not load include file amsmath.sty at template.tex line 4 column 21
> [INFO] Could not load include file color.sty at template.tex line 6 column 19
> [INFO] Could not load include file xcolor.sty at template.tex line 7 column 22
> [INFO] Could not load include file hyperref.sty at template.tex line 8 column 62
> [INFO] Could not load include file titlesec.sty at template.tex line 10 column 22
> [INFO] Could not load include file authblk.sty at template.tex line 11 column 21
> [

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/9D3E1DD3-1A8C-4AB1-8772-74A7245636AA%40gmail.com.

Re: pandoc convert latex to jats Could not load include file

[幻世子衍]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2540 bytes --]

With these errors, the converted xml file does not contain the complete tex
content, and the result can only be displayed like this
<p> <styled-content style="background-color: editorial">
</styled-content> </p>
<boxed-text>
   <p><bold></bold></p>
</boxed-text>
<boxed-text>
   <p><bold></bold></p>
</boxed-text>
<p>https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-264</p>

John MacFarlane <fiddlosopher-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 于2023年11月23日周四 11:35写道：

> These are harmless and expected.
>
> They just indicate that pandoc is not finding and parsing the style files
> you're loading. It's not really expected that it would (and in many cases
> it couldn't, because these have too much low-level TeX).
>
>
>
> > On Nov 22, 2023, at 1:15 AM, 幻世子衍 <unrealyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > The full log:
> >
> > pandoc -f latex -t jats_archiving  main.tex --resource-path=. --verbose
> > [INFO] Could not load include file extsizes.sty at template.tex line 1
> column 28
> > [INFO] Could not load include file multicol.sty at template.tex line 3
> column 22
> > [INFO] Could not load include file amsmath.sty at template.tex line 4
> column 21
> > [INFO] Could not load include file color.sty at template.tex line 6
> column 19
> > [INFO] Could not load include file xcolor.sty at template.tex line 7
> column 22
> > [INFO] Could not load include file hyperref.sty at template.tex line 8
> column 62
> > [INFO] Could not load include file titlesec.sty at template.tex line 10
> column 22
> > [INFO] Could not load include file authblk.sty at template.tex line 11
> column 21
> > [
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/9D3E1DD3-1A8C-4AB1-8772-74A7245636AA%40gmail.com
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/CAC_9v0bJn_%2BDhg%3DN0JLVCDqVcv1xp8Lk-O4xbSmbBHBYP-KC2A%40mail.gmail.com.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3710 bytes --]

Re: pandoc convert latex to jats Could not load include file

[幻世子衍]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2034 bytes --]

With these errors, the converted xml file does not contain the complete tex 
content, and the result can only be displayed like this
<p> <styled-content style="background-color: editorial">
</styled-content> </p>
<boxed-text>
   <p><bold></bold></p>
</boxed-text>
<boxed-text>
   <p><bold></bold></p>
</boxed-text>
<p>https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-264</p>

在2023年11月23日星期四 UTC+8 11:35:17<John MacFarlane> 写道：

> These are harmless and expected.
>
> They just indicate that pandoc is not finding and parsing the style files 
> you're loading. It's not really expected that it would (and in many cases 
> it couldn't, because these have too much low-level TeX).
>
>
>
> > On Nov 22, 2023, at 1:15 AM, 幻世子衍 <unre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > The full log:
> > 
> > pandoc -f latex -t jats_archiving main.tex --resource-path=. --verbose
> > [INFO] Could not load include file extsizes.sty at template.tex line 1 
> column 28
> > [INFO] Could not load include file multicol.sty at template.tex line 3 
> column 22
> > [INFO] Could not load include file amsmath.sty at template.tex line 4 
> column 21
> > [INFO] Could not load include file color.sty at template.tex line 6 
> column 19
> > [INFO] Could not load include file xcolor.sty at template.tex line 7 
> column 22
> > [INFO] Could not load include file hyperref.sty at template.tex line 8 
> column 62
> > [INFO] Could not load include file titlesec.sty at template.tex line 10 
> column 22
> > [INFO] Could not load include file authblk.sty at template.tex line 11 
> column 21
> > [
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/1d7b8433-a03d-4c3f-9d70-ab9055ead787n%40googlegroups.com.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2818 bytes --]

Re: pandoc convert latex to jats Could not load include file

[幻世子衍]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 18291 bytes --]


my full tex content like this


\documentclass[a3paper,12pt]{article}




% \ProvidesPackage{ame}[2023/08/14 AME package]


\include{template.tex}

% 设置页眉样式
\pagestyle{fancy}
% 设置页眉线宽度为零
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
\fancyhf{} % 清空当前页眉页脚设置

% 在页眉的左侧位置放置自定义信息
\fancyhead[L]{\textbf{Translational Pediatrics, Vol 12, No 8 August 2023 }}

% 在页眉的中间位置放置自定义信息
% \fancyhead[C]{Custom Center Header Text}
% 设置起始页码为 1450
\setcounter{page}{1450}
% 在页眉的右侧位置放置自定义信息
\fancyhead[R]{\textbf{\thepage}}


% 设置页脚样式,同时设置需要注释以下两行
% \pagestyle{fancy}
% \fancyhf{} % 清空当前页眉页脚设置

% 在页脚的左侧位置放置自定义信息
\fancyfoot[L]{© Translational Pediatrics. All rights reserved. }
\fancyfoot[R]{Transl Pediatr 2023;12(8):1450-1453 | 
https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-264 }

% 在页脚的中间位置放置页码
% \fancyfoot[C]{\thepage}

% 在首页不显示页眉
\thispagestyle{empty}

% Redefine \thanks
\makeatletter
\renewcommand\thanks[1]{\^{}}
\makeatother

\makeatletter
\renewcommand{\maketitle}{\bgroup\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}


\begin{flushleft}
\LARGE\textbf{\@title}
\end{flushleft}

\begin{flushleft}
\textbf{\@author}
\end{flushleft}
}


\renewcommand{\author}{\noindent{}}
\newcommand\address{\noindent{}}
\newcommand{\authornote}{}
\newcommand\correspondence[1]{\noindent{\textit{Correspondence to:} #1}}
\newcommand\commenton[1]{\noindent{\textit{Comment on}: #1}}

\newcommand\keywords[1]{\noindent{\textbf{\textcolor
[RGB]{21,72,135}{Keywords:}} #1}}

\newcommand\submitted[1]{\noindent{Submitted #1}}
\newcommand\doi[1]{\noindent{doi: #1}}
\newcommand\viewarticle[1]{\noindent{\textbf{View this article at: }}#1}

% \renewcommand{\section}[1]{
% \vspace{2ex}
% \textbf{\textcolor[RGB]{21,72,135}{#1}}
% \vspace{2ex}
% }

\newcommand{\amesection}[1]{
\vspace{2ex}
\noindent\textmd{\textbf{\normalfont\Large\bfseries\textcolor
[RGB]{21,72,135}{#1}}}
% {\color{sectiontitlecolor}\normalfont\Large\bfseries}
\vspace{2ex}
}






% %%Numbered environment
% \newcounter{ame}[section]
% \newenvironment{ame}[1][]{\refstepcounter{ame}\par\medskip
% \noindent \textbf{My~environment~\theexample. #1} \rmfamily}{\medskip}





% 
\begin{document}{\colorbox{editorial}{\noindent{\textcolor{white}{\textbf{Editorial}}}}
\begin{document}{
\noindent\colorbox{editorial}{\makebox[0.3\linewidth][l]{%
\setlength{\parskip}{1em} % 设置段落间距
\setlength{\parindent}{1em} % 设置段落缩进
\textcolor{white}{Editorial}
}
}
}

\title{Evolution in the management of pectus excavatum in pediatric 
patients}
\date{}

% \author[1\thanks{Corresponding author: email-hcDgGtZH8xNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org}]{Author One}
% % \hspace{1em} % 设置作者之间的间距
% \author[2]{Ivor Question}

% \author[2]{He Yan}
% \affil[1]{Chest Wall Unit at the Department of Pediatric Surgery, 
Children’s Hospital of Eastern Switzerland, Sta. Gallen, Switzerland; }
% \affil[2]{Faculty of Medicine,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland;}

\renewcommand\Authands{, } % This line sets "," between authors
\maketitle
% \author{\noindent{\textbf{Frank-Martin 
Haecker\textsuperscript{1,2}\authornote{\^{}}}}}

\vspace{2ex}
% \address{\textsuperscript{1}Chest Wall Unit at the Department of 
Pediatric Surgery, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Switzerland, Sta. Gallen, 
Switzerland; }
% \address{\textsuperscript{2}Faculty of Medicine,University of Basel, 
Basel, Switzerland}

\correspondence{Frank-Martin Haecker, MD, Professor of Pediatric Surgery. 
Chest Wall Unit at the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children’s
Hospital of Eastern Switzerland, Claudiusstrasse 6, CH-9006 St. Gallen, 
Switzerland. Email: frank-martin.haecker-kpaEHHRHYO5yDzI6CaY1VQ@public.gmane.org}

\commenton{Scalise PN, Demehri FR. The management of pectus excavatum in 
pediatric patients: a narrative review. Transl Pediatr 2023;12:208-20.}
\vspace{2ex}
\keywords{Pectus excavatum; pediatric patients; Nuss procedure; vacuum 
bell; cryoablation}

\vspace{2ex}

\submitted{Apr 26, 2023. Accepted for publication Jul 19, 2023. Published 
online Jul 28, 2023}
\doi{10.21037/tp-23-264}

\viewarticle{https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-264}

\vspace{4ex}

\begin{multicols}{2}
{
\indent The majority of congenital chest wall deformities (CWD)
affects the anterior chest wall. The most common anterior
CWD is pectus excavatum (PE), followed by Pectus
carinatum (PC). The incidence of PE is approximately
1 in every 300–400 births, affecting male patients with
an approx. 4:1 ratio (\cite{pmid36891368}). For the last 70 to 80 years, 
open
surgical repair such as the Ravitch technique and its
modifications (\cite{pmid35820596,pmid35455522}) was the preferred method 
to correct
CWDs. An essential paradigm shift occurred with the
inauguration of the minimally invasive repair of pectus
excavatum (MIRPE) by Nuss (\cite{pmid35377161}). In contrast to open
repair, MIRPE does not require cartilage or sternal
resection. Flexibility and elasticity of the chest wall which
are preserved applying MIRPE, were identified as relevant
parameters for successful treatment of CWD. Furthermore,
an increasing number of patients presented with thoracic
chondrodystrophy as a long-term side effect after open
surgical repair. As a consequence, the management of CWD
including diagnostic work-up as well as conservative and
surgical treatment options has made substantial progress
during the past two decades. Today, treatment of CWD
includes all age groups with pediatric, adolescent and adult
patients, covered by a dedicated multidisciplinary team
(in particular pediatric and thoracic surgeons) based in a
specialized chest wall unit, what is the most important pillar
of present time.
The physiologic effects of CWD are still discussed
controversially. There is an ongoing controversial debate
concerning effects of MIRPE on exercise tolerance, lack
of endurance, shortness of breath, cardiopulmonary
function, body posture, etc. Even if the number of articles
reporting on different aspects of CWD treatment went
up from approximately 300 (1980 to 1989) to more than
1,000 published papers (2012 to 2021), the controversial
debate will continue (\cite{pmid34942673}). Information on new diagnostic
and therapeutic modalities provided by online platforms
and social media circulates not only among surgeons
and paediatricians, but also rapidly among patients. Not
only different surgical techniques, but also conservative
treatment options are available. In almost the same manner,
postoperative pain management is an important part of
an effective and successful treatment protocol. Several
modifications were introduced over the past years. For a
long time, regional analgesia such as paravertebral nerve
blocks or catheters, epidurals as well as patient-controlled
analgesia (PCA) represented the preferred anesthesia
method. Nowadays, cryoablation became a more and
more applied alternative technique (\cite{pmid33853733,pmid32753276}). 
Cryoablation
may be applied thoracoscopically during MIRPE (\cite{pmid31600804}), or as
ultrasound guided percutaneous intercostal injection (\cite{pmid31199434}).
After its introduction, MIRPE was well established
in the first decade of this century and subsequently
performed with increasing frequency worldwide. Today,
MIRPE represents the worldwide used “gold-standard”
for surgical repair of PE. Applying the technique in
different age groups, the method experienced numerous
modifications. Modifications include patient selection
and indication, preoperative evaluation, as well as age
at time of surgical repair. Positioning of the patient on
the OR table, intubation (single lumen vs. double lumen
tubus) were modified. Number, location and size of skin
incisions, shape/size or number of bars and bar fixation as
well as bar passage (intra vs. extrapleural placement) were
modified (\cite{pmid29672193}). To reduce the risk of secondary bar
displacement and/or to correct complex CWDs, placement
of more than 1 bar including the so called cross-bar
technique was introduced (\cite{pmid28822540}).

Two fundamental techniques were introduced to reduce
the risk of intraoperative cardiac injuries: routine unilateral
and/or bilateral thoracoscopy (\cite{pmid25814003}), and routine sternal
elevation (\cite{pmid18582824,pmid11877663}). Whereas in the initial 
publication by
Nuss retrosternal dissection was described as “blunt” using
a long-curved clamp without thoracoscopy (4), the same
group reported their experience using routine thoracoscopy
4 years later, achieving improved safety during mediastinal
dissection (\cite{pmid10803339}). In particular the risk of cardiac 
perforation
as the most severe complication could be decreased with
the routine use of thoracoscopic guidance (\cite{pmid9574749}). Even
more than 2 decades after its introduction there is no
evidence-based data available concerning the protective
effect of thoracoscopy on the true incidence of near fatal
complications like cardiac injuries. However, the majority of
articles and studies reporting on catastrophic complications
were all published before 2011 (5). Furthermore, the
widespread use of routine intraoperative sternal elevation
must be considered as an additional effective measure
to improve safety of MIRPE (13). 

Visualization across
the mediastinum during retrosternal dissection may be
compromised in severe defects. Notably in older adult PE
patients, decreased flexibility and stiffness of the anterior
chest wall as well as the corresponding force required
to elevate the sternum may make retrosternal dissection
difficult and sometimes nearby impossible. Applying routine
sternal elevation during MIRPE, the safety of the procedure
has improved clearly as there was no near-fatal and/or fatal
incident reported anymore when the technique was applied
intraoperatively (13).
Evolution in the management of congenital CWD and
modifications of newly introduced techniques have made
significant progress over the past 2–3 decades, and as a
consequence patients outcome improved substantially.
The aim of the narrative review presented by Scalise and
Demehri (\cite{pmid18582824}) is to outline current practice concerning
diagnostic work-up, conservative and surgical treatment
as well as management in general of pediatric PE patients.
Since we may find numerous publications dealing with this
topic, it is nearby impossible to review all the literature,
covering all different age groups. In particular no
randomized double-blind studies are available. Therefore,
the quality of evidence regarding this topic remains
relatively low with still many unexplored and unknown
pathways. Different objective criteria were screened, verified
and added to identify PE patients that would benefit from
surgery. An increasing number of studies accentuating the
cardiopulmonary consequences of PE. Notably, more than
275 papers have been published in the last 10 years focusing
on functional changes prior to and after surgical correction
of PE. Due to different reasons (e.g., retrospective and/or
small cohort studies), the results are still heterogenous and
of low evidential quality (\cite{pmid18582824}). Based on this generally 
poor
evidence, the controversial debate on the cardiopulmonary
impact of PE and whether patients may benefit from
surgical repair or not will continue as long as we may be
able to provide double blind randomized studies. However,
IRB approval for such a study has to be considered as
difficult or nearby impossible. This is aggravated by the
fact that PE is many times considered as an “only” esthetic
disorder and in particular associated with body image
disturbances. In contrast, among surgeons and confirmed
by recently published studies it is clearly acknowledged
that subjective improvement in exercise intolerance is
often reported after MIRPE (\cite{pmid18582824}). Thus, despite above
mentioned facts as well as current believes, reviews such as
presented by Scalise and Demehri may help to bridge the
lack of convincing high-quality evidence which remains a
critical concern that could potentially interfere with future
management of PE. As concluded by Scalise and Demehri
in their narrative review, there is still a lack of international
consensus guidelines concerning preoperative diagnostic
work-up, conservative and surgical treatment as well as
postoperative management. A recently published study
by Janssen et al. reported on a consensus statement for
perioperative care for PE based on a multi-round Delphi
survey (\cite{pmid18582824}). Pectus surgeons all around the world are
encouraged to draw up standardized consensus guidelines to
establish a high-level algorithm for preoperative diagnostic
protocol, indications for conservative and/or surgical
treatment as well as postoperative management.
}
\amesection{Acknowledgments}
Funding: None.

\amesection{Footnot}
\textit{Provenance and Peer Review:} This article was commissioned
by the editorial office, Translational Pediatrics. The article
did not undergo external peer review.

\vspace{1ex}
\textit{Conflicts of Interest: }The author has completed the ICMJE
uniform disclosure form (available at \url{https://tp.amegroups.
com/article/view/10.21037/tp-23-264/coif} ). The author has
no conflicts of interest to declare.
\vspace{2ex}

\textit{Ethical Statement:} The author is accountable for all
aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related
to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are
appropriately investigated and resolved.

\vspace{2ex}

\textit{Open Access Statement:} This is an Open Access article
distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International
License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-
commercial replication and distribution of the article with
the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the
original work is properly cited (including links to both the
formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license).
See: \href{https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
}{https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0}

Let's cite! Einstein's journal paper and Dirac's book \cite{dirac} are 
physics-related items. 


\titleformat{\section}
{\color{sectiontitlecolor}\normalfont\Large\bfseries}
{\thesection}{1em}{}

\bibliographystyle{unsrt}
\bibliography{main}


% 
\cite{pmid18582824,pmid10803339,pmid9574749,pmid35455522,pmid31600804,pmid29672193,pmid33853733,pmid34942673,pmid35820596,pmid25814003,pmid31199434,pmid32753276,pmid11877663,pmid28822540,pmid36891368,pmid35377161}

% 在文中插入引用信息
\noindent\colorbox{cite}{
% \begin{minipage}{\dimexpr\textwidth-2\fboxsep} %单栏模式
\begin{minipage}{\dimexpr0.5\textwidth-2\fboxsep} 
\setlength{\parskip}{0em} % 设置段落间距
\setlength{\parindent}{0em} % 设置段落缩进
Cite this article as: Haecker FM. Evolution in the management of pectus 
excavatum in pediatric patients. Transl Pediatr 2023;12(8):1450-1453. doi: 
10.21037/tp-23-264

\end{minipage}}

\end{multicols}

\end{document}
在2023年11月23日星期四 UTC+8 16:13:18<幻世子衍> 写道：

> With these errors, the converted xml file does not contain the complete 
> tex content, and the result can only be displayed like this
>
> <p> <styled-content style="background-color: editorial">
> </styled-content> </p>
> <boxed-text>
>    <p><bold></bold></p>
> </boxed-text>
> <boxed-text>
>    <p><bold></bold></p>
> </boxed-text>
> <p>https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-264</p>
>
> John MacFarlane <fiddlo...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 于2023年11月23日周四 11:35写道：
>
>> These are harmless and expected.
>>
>> They just indicate that pandoc is not finding and parsing the style files 
>> you're loading. It's not really expected that it would (and in many cases 
>> it couldn't, because these have too much low-level TeX).
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Nov 22, 2023, at 1:15 AM, 幻世子衍 <unre...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> > 
>> > The full log:
>> > 
>> > pandoc -f latex -t jats_archiving  main.tex --resource-path=. --verbose
>> > [INFO] Could not load include file extsizes.sty at template.tex line 1 
>> column 28
>> > [INFO] Could not load include file multicol.sty at template.tex line 3 
>> column 22
>> > [INFO] Could not load include file amsmath.sty at template.tex line 4 
>> column 21
>> > [INFO] Could not load include file color.sty at template.tex line 6 
>> column 19
>> > [INFO] Could not load include file xcolor.sty at template.tex line 7 
>> column 22
>> > [INFO] Could not load include file hyperref.sty at template.tex line 8 
>> column 62
>> > [INFO] Could not load include file titlesec.sty at template.tex line 10 
>> column 22
>> > [INFO] Could not load include file authblk.sty at template.tex line 11 
>> column 21
>> > [
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "pandoc-discuss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/9D3E1DD3-1A8C-4AB1-8772-74A7245636AA%40gmail.com
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/c916761a-23e9-43d0-b7b3-ff198d13a4c9n%40googlegroups.com.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 33784 bytes --]

Re: pandoc convert latex to jats Could not load include file

[John MacFarlane]

Looks like the main problem is that pandoc is skipping the multicols environment (i.e., pandoc doesn't know how to parse this).  We should probably add support for this, as it's a fairly commonly used package.  Putting an issue on our GitHub tracker would help remind me of this.

> On Nov 23, 2023, at 3:14 AM, 幻世子衍 <unrealyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> my full tex content like this
> 
> 
> \documentclass[a3paper,12pt]{article}
> 
> 
> 
> 
> % \ProvidesPackage{ame}[2023/08/14 AME package]
> 
> 
> \include{template.tex}
> 
> % 设置页眉样式
> \pagestyle{fancy}
> % 设置页眉线宽度为零
> \renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
> \fancyhf{} % 清空当前页眉页脚设置
> 
> % 在页眉的左侧位置放置自定义信息
> \fancyhead[L]{\textbf{Translational Pediatrics, Vol 12, No 8 August 2023 }}
> 
> % 在页眉的中间位置放置自定义信息
> % \fancyhead[C]{Custom Center Header Text}
> % 设置起始页码为 1450
> \setcounter{page}{1450}
> % 在页眉的右侧位置放置自定义信息
> \fancyhead[R]{\textbf{\thepage}}
> 
> 
> % 设置页脚样式,同时设置需要注释以下两行
> % \pagestyle{fancy}
> % \fancyhf{} % 清空当前页眉页脚设置
> 
> % 在页脚的左侧位置放置自定义信息
> \fancyfoot[L]{© Translational Pediatrics. All rights reserved. }
> \fancyfoot[R]{Transl Pediatr 2023;12(8):1450-1453 | https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-264 }
> 
> % 在页脚的中间位置放置页码
> % \fancyfoot[C]{\thepage}
> 
> % 在首页不显示页眉
> \thispagestyle{empty}
> 
>   % Redefine \thanks
> \makeatletter
> \renewcommand\thanks[1]{\^{}}
> \makeatother
> 
> \makeatletter
> \renewcommand{\maketitle}{\bgroup\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}
> 
> 
> \begin{flushleft}
> \LARGE\textbf{\@title}
> \end{flushleft}
> 
> \begin{flushleft}
> \textbf{\@author}
> \end{flushleft}
> }
> 
> 
> \renewcommand{\author}{\noindent{}}
> \newcommand\address{\noindent{}}
> \newcommand{\authornote}{}
> \newcommand\correspondence[1]{\noindent{\textit{Correspondence to:} #1}}
> \newcommand\commenton[1]{\noindent{\textit{Comment on}: #1}}
> 
> \newcommand\keywords[1]{\noindent{\textbf{\textcolor[RGB]{21,72,135}{Keywords:}} #1}}
> 
> \newcommand\submitted[1]{\noindent{Submitted #1}}
> \newcommand\doi[1]{\noindent{doi: #1}}
> \newcommand\viewarticle[1]{\noindent{\textbf{View this article at: }}#1}
> 
> % \renewcommand{\section}[1]{
> %     \vspace{2ex}
> %     \textbf{\textcolor[RGB]{21,72,135}{#1}}
> %     \vspace{2ex}
> % }
> 
> \newcommand{\amesection}[1]{
>     \vspace{2ex}
>     \noindent\textmd{\textbf{\normalfont\Large\bfseries\textcolor[RGB]{21,72,135}{#1}}}
>      % {\color{sectiontitlecolor}\normalfont\Large\bfseries}
>     \vspace{2ex}
> }
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> % %%Numbered environment
> % \newcounter{ame}[section]
> % \newenvironment{ame}[1][]{\refstepcounter{ame}\par\medskip
> % \noindent \textbf{My~environment~\theexample. #1} \rmfamily}{\medskip}
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> % \begin{document}{\colorbox{editorial}{\noindent{\textcolor{white}{\textbf{Editorial}}}}
> \begin{document}{
>     \noindent\colorbox{editorial}{\makebox[0.3\linewidth][l]{%
>     \setlength{\parskip}{1em} % 设置段落间距
>     \setlength{\parindent}{1em} % 设置段落缩进
>     \textcolor{white}{Editorial}
>     }
> }
> }
> 
>     \title{Evolution in the management  of pectus excavatum in pediatric 
> patients}
>     \date{}
> 
>     % \author[1\thanks{Corresponding author: email-hcDgGtZH8xNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org}]{Author One}
>     % % \hspace{1em} % 设置作者之间的间距
>     % \author[2]{Ivor Question}
> 
>     % \author[2]{He Yan}
>     
>     % \affil[1]{Chest Wall Unit at the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Switzerland, Sta. Gallen, Switzerland; }
>     
>     % \affil[2]{Faculty of Medicine,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland;}
>     
>   
> 
>     \renewcommand\Authands{, } % This line sets "," between authors
>     
>     
>     \maketitle
>     % \author{\noindent{\textbf{Frank-Martin Haecker\textsuperscript{1,2}\authornote{\^{}}}}}
> 
>     
>     
>     \vspace{2ex}
>     
>     % \address{\textsuperscript{1}Chest Wall Unit at the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Switzerland, Sta. Gallen, Switzerland; }
>     % \address{\textsuperscript{2}Faculty of Medicine,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland}
> 
>     \correspondence{Frank-Martin Haecker, MD, Professor of Pediatric Surgery. Chest Wall Unit at the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children’s
> Hospital of Eastern Switzerland, Claudiusstrasse 6, CH-9006 St. Gallen, Switzerland. Email: frank-martin.haecker-kpaEHHRHYO5yDzI6CaY1VQ@public.gmane.org}
> 
>     \commenton{Scalise PN, Demehri FR. The management of pectus excavatum in pediatric patients: a narrative review. Transl Pediatr 2023;12:208-20.}
>     
>     \vspace{2ex}
>     \keywords{Pectus excavatum; pediatric patients; Nuss procedure; vacuum bell; cryoablation}
> 
>     \vspace{2ex}
> 
>     \submitted{Apr 26, 2023. Accepted for publication Jul 19, 2023. Published online Jul 28, 2023}
>     
>     \doi{10.21037/tp-23-264}
> 
>     \viewarticle{https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-264}
> 
>     \vspace{4ex}
> 
>     \begin{multicols}{2}
>     {
>     \indent The majority of congenital chest wall deformities (CWD)
> affects the anterior chest wall. The most common anterior
> CWD is pectus excavatum (PE), followed by Pectus
> carinatum (PC). The incidence of PE is approximately
> 1 in every 300–400 births, affecting male patients with
> an approx. 4:1 ratio (\cite{pmid36891368}). For the last 70 to 80 years, open
> surgical repair such as the Ravitch technique and its
> modifications (\cite{pmid35820596,pmid35455522}) was the preferred method to correct
> CWDs. An essential paradigm shift occurred with the
> inauguration of the minimally invasive repair of pectus
> excavatum (MIRPE) by Nuss (\cite{pmid35377161}). In contrast to open
> repair, MIRPE does not require cartilage or sternal
> resection. Flexibility and elasticity of the chest wall which
> are preserved applying MIRPE, were identified as relevant
> parameters for successful treatment of CWD. Furthermore,
> an increasing number of patients presented with thoracic
> chondrodystrophy as a long-term side effect after open
> surgical repair. As a consequence, the management of CWD
> including diagnostic work-up as well as conservative and
> surgical treatment options has made substantial progress
> during the past two decades. Today, treatment of CWD
> includes all age groups with pediatric, adolescent and adult
> patients, covered by a dedicated multidisciplinary team
> (in particular pediatric and thoracic surgeons) based in a
> specialized chest wall unit, what is the most important pillar
> of present time.
> The physiologic effects of CWD are still discussed
> controversially. There is an ongoing controversial debate
> concerning effects of MIRPE on exercise tolerance, lack
> of endurance, shortness of breath, cardiopulmonary
> function, body posture, etc. Even if the number of articles
> reporting on different aspects of CWD treatment went
> up from approximately 300 (1980 to 1989) to more than
> 1,000 published papers (2012 to 2021), the controversial
> debate will continue (\cite{pmid34942673}). Information on new diagnostic
> and therapeutic modalities provided by online platforms
> and social media circulates not only among surgeons
> and paediatricians, but also rapidly among patients. Not
> only different surgical techniques, but also conservative
> treatment options are available. In almost the same manner,
> postoperative pain management is an important part of
> an effective and successful treatment protocol. Several
> modifications were introduced over the past years. For a
> long time, regional analgesia such as paravertebral nerve
> blocks or catheters, epidurals as well as patient-controlled
> analgesia (PCA) represented the preferred anesthesia
> method. Nowadays, cryoablation became a more and
> more applied alternative technique (\cite{pmid33853733,pmid32753276}). Cryoablation
> may be applied thoracoscopically during MIRPE (\cite{pmid31600804}), or as
> ultrasound guided percutaneous intercostal injection (\cite{pmid31199434}).
> After its introduction, MIRPE was well established
> in the first decade of this century and subsequently
> performed with increasing frequency worldwide. Today,
> MIRPE represents the worldwide used “gold-standard”
> for surgical repair of PE. Applying the technique in
> different age groups, the method experienced numerous
> modifications. Modifications include patient selection
> and indication, preoperative evaluation, as well as age
> at time of surgical repair. Positioning of the patient on
> the OR table, intubation (single lumen vs. double lumen
> tubus) were modified. Number, location and size of skin
> incisions, shape/size or number of bars and bar fixation as
> well as bar passage (intra vs. extrapleural placement) were
> modified (\cite{pmid29672193}). To reduce the risk of secondary bar
> displacement and/or to correct complex CWDs, placement
> of more than 1 bar including the so called cross-bar
> technique was introduced (\cite{pmid28822540}).
> 
> Two fundamental techniques were introduced to reduce
> the risk of intraoperative cardiac injuries: routine unilateral
> and/or bilateral thoracoscopy (\cite{pmid25814003}), and routine sternal
> elevation (\cite{pmid18582824,pmid11877663}). Whereas in the initial publication by
> Nuss retrosternal dissection was described as “blunt” using
> a long-curved clamp without thoracoscopy (4), the same
> group reported their experience using routine thoracoscopy
> 4 years later, achieving improved safety during mediastinal
> dissection (\cite{pmid10803339}). In particular the risk of cardiac perforation
> as the most severe complication could be decreased with
> the routine use of thoracoscopic guidance (\cite{pmid9574749}). Even
> more than 2 decades after its introduction there is no
> evidence-based data available concerning the protective
> effect of thoracoscopy on the true incidence of near fatal
> complications like cardiac injuries. However, the majority of
> articles and studies reporting on catastrophic complications
> were all published before 2011 (5). Furthermore, the
> widespread use of routine intraoperative sternal elevation
> must be considered as an additional effective measure
> to improve safety of MIRPE (13). 
> 
> Visualization across
> the mediastinum during retrosternal dissection may be
> compromised in severe defects. Notably in older adult PE
> patients, decreased flexibility and stiffness of the anterior
> chest wall as well as the corresponding force required
> to elevate the sternum may make retrosternal dissection
> difficult and sometimes nearby impossible. Applying routine
> sternal elevation during MIRPE, the safety of the procedure
> has improved clearly as there was no near-fatal and/or fatal
> incident reported anymore when the technique was applied
> intraoperatively (13).
> Evolution in the management of congenital CWD and
> modifications of newly introduced techniques have made
> significant progress over the past 2–3 decades, and as a
> consequence patients outcome improved substantially.
> The aim of the narrative review presented by Scalise and
> Demehri (\cite{pmid18582824}) is to outline current practice concerning
> diagnostic work-up, conservative and surgical treatment
> as well as management in general of pediatric PE patients.
> Since we may find numerous publications dealing with this
> topic, it is nearby impossible to review all the literature,
> covering all different age groups. In particular no
> randomized double-blind studies are available. Therefore,
> the quality of evidence regarding this topic remains
> relatively low with still many unexplored and unknown
> pathways. Different objective criteria were screened, verified
> and added to identify PE patients that would benefit from
> surgery. An increasing number of studies accentuating the
> cardiopulmonary consequences of PE. Notably, more than
> 275 papers have been published in the last 10 years focusing
> on functional changes prior to and after surgical correction
> of PE. Due to different reasons (e.g., retrospective and/or
> small cohort studies), the results are still heterogenous and
> of low evidential quality (\cite{pmid18582824}). Based on this generally poor
> evidence, the controversial debate on the cardiopulmonary
> impact of PE and whether patients may benefit from
> surgical repair or not will continue as long as we may be
> able to provide double blind randomized studies. However,
> IRB approval for such a study has to be considered as
> difficult or nearby impossible. This is aggravated by the
> fact that PE is many times considered as an “only” esthetic
> disorder and in particular associated with body image
> disturbances. In contrast, among surgeons and confirmed
> by recently published studies it is clearly acknowledged
> that subjective improvement in exercise intolerance is
> often reported after MIRPE (\cite{pmid18582824}). Thus, despite above
> mentioned facts as well as current believes, reviews such as
> presented by Scalise and Demehri may help to bridge the
> lack of convincing high-quality evidence which remains a
> critical concern that could potentially interfere with future
> management of PE. As concluded by Scalise and Demehri
> in their narrative review, there is still a lack of international
> consensus guidelines concerning preoperative diagnostic
> work-up, conservative and surgical treatment as well as
> postoperative management. A recently published study
> by Janssen et al. reported on a consensus statement for
> perioperative care for PE based on a multi-round Delphi
> survey (\cite{pmid18582824}). Pectus surgeons all around the world are
> encouraged to draw up standardized consensus guidelines to
> establish a high-level algorithm for preoperative diagnostic
> protocol, indications for conservative and/or surgical
> treatment as well as postoperative management.
>     }
>         
>    \amesection{Acknowledgments}
>    
>    Funding: None.
> 
>    \amesection{Footnot}
>    
>    \textit{Provenance and Peer Review:} This article was commissioned
> by the editorial office, Translational Pediatrics. The article
> did not undergo external peer review.
> 
>     \vspace{1ex}
>     
>     \textit{Conflicts of Interest: }The author has completed the ICMJE
>     uniform disclosure form (available at \url{https://tp.amegroups.
>     com/article/view/10.21037/tp-23-264/coif} ). The author has
>     no conflicts of interest to declare.
>     
>     \vspace{2ex}
> 
>     \textit{Ethical Statement:} The author is accountable for all
> aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related
> to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are
> appropriately investigated and resolved.
> 
>     \vspace{2ex}
> 
>     \textit{Open Access Statement:} This is an Open Access article
> distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons
> Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International
> License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-
> commercial replication and distribution of the article with
> the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the
> original work is properly cited (including links to both the
> formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license).
> See: \href{https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0}{https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0}
> 
> Let's cite! Einstein's journal paper and Dirac's book \cite{dirac} are physics-related items. 
> 
> 
>     \titleformat{\section}
>       {\color{sectiontitlecolor}\normalfont\Large\bfseries}
>       {\thesection}{1em}{}
> 
>     \bibliographystyle{unsrt}
>     \bibliography{main}
>    
> 
> 
>   
>     % \cite{pmid18582824,pmid10803339,pmid9574749,pmid35455522,pmid31600804,pmid29672193,pmid33853733,pmid34942673,pmid35820596,pmid25814003,pmid31199434,pmid32753276,pmid11877663,pmid28822540,pmid36891368,pmid35377161}
> 
>     % 在文中插入引用信息
> \noindent\colorbox{cite}{
> % \begin{minipage}{\dimexpr\textwidth-2\fboxsep} %单栏模式
> \begin{minipage}{\dimexpr0.5\textwidth-2\fboxsep} 
>     \setlength{\parskip}{0em} % 设置段落间距
>     \setlength{\parindent}{0em} % 设置段落缩进
>     Cite this article as: Haecker FM. Evolution in the management of pectus excavatum in pediatric patients. Transl Pediatr 2023;12(8):1450-1453. doi: 10.21037/tp-23-264
> 
> \end{minipage}}
> 
> \end{multicols}
> 
> \end{document}
> 在2023年11月23日星期四 UTC+8 16:13:18<幻世子衍> 写道：
> With these errors, the converted xml file does not contain the complete tex content, and the result can only be displayed like this
> 
> <p> <styled-content style="background-color: editorial">
> </styled-content> </p>
> <boxed-text>
>    <p><bold></bold></p>
> </boxed-text>
> <boxed-text>
>    <p><bold></bold></p>
> </boxed-text>
> <p>https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-264</p>
> 
> John MacFarlane <fiddlo...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 于2023年11月23日周四 11:35写道：
> These are harmless and expected.
> 
> They just indicate that pandoc is not finding and parsing the style files you're loading. It's not really expected that it would (and in many cases it couldn't, because these have too much low-level TeX).
> 
> 
> 
> > On Nov 22, 2023, at 1:15 AM, 幻世子衍 <unre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > The full log:
> > 
> > pandoc -f latex -t jats_archiving  main.tex --resource-path=. --verbose
> > [INFO] Could not load include file extsizes.sty at template.tex line 1 column 28
> > [INFO] Could not load include file multicol.sty at template.tex line 3 column 22
> > [INFO] Could not load include file amsmath.sty at template.tex line 4 column 21
> > [INFO] Could not load include file color.sty at template.tex line 6 column 19
> > [INFO] Could not load include file xcolor.sty at template.tex line 7 column 22
> > [INFO] Could not load include file hyperref.sty at template.tex line 8 column 62
> > [INFO] Could not load include file titlesec.sty at template.tex line 10 column 22
> > [INFO] Could not load include file authblk.sty at template.tex line 11 column 21
> > [
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/9D3E1DD3-1A8C-4AB1-8772-74A7245636AA%40gmail.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/c916761a-23e9-43d0-b7b3-ff198d13a4c9n%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/2215214F-3DB6-4B4F-AEFB-3476D9F22471%40gmail.com.