From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.text.pandoc/12124 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John MacFarlane Newsgroups: gmane.text.pandoc Subject: Re: Reference.docx and default Word styles Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:11:15 -0800 Message-ID: <20150224181115.GA439@protagoras.berkeley.edu> References: <10d80cbd-5bdb-4937-811c-24af52aaadf3@googlegroups.com> <62149c61-fcbb-465d-b1ca-6d0b881c9072@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1424801501 8899 80.91.229.3 (24 Feb 2015 18:11:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:11:41 +0000 (UTC) To: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Original-X-From: pandoc-discuss+bncBCJZJHG45QDBBUP5WKTQKGQEYKEXNYA-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Tue Feb 24 19:11:31 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gtp-pandoc-discuss@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-vc0-f184.google.com ([209.85.220.184]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YQJxC-0000n4-PN for gtp-pandoc-discuss@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:11:30 +0100 Original-Received: by mail-vc0-f184.google.com with SMTP id hy4sf8182174vcb.1 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:11:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=from:date:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=GghfFGTeByFroacaA0Xtw9fNo5ihAm5YXeFZc0caXC8=; b=yL/x4Y1v6TD1WY4pc9ndxSNRo7XAtWaBAS0EzTfRc8wp94n3Hv6kQUhHf5mF3hM35N 1k/qiDr8hJ+E4BSRWR2NrKn51vbgxH9nbp9zq68h9IszhewSq2pPO+RwE+Wvhwy8rfBi +CXEywA5eYQw+YkIHh8xHMRwLsV8Iud2dQZP2kw6bi3l5B7x6cvO58sG8mVvJrD/pjUY Bq3zWQuZBBd85Jl82sFDiDwq4LEm9saby2cbMi2C2cMQ8XFNrI9zSjQ/rP0qTRJlCp9r E76QcPgX7PmCsWu3i9ShjQTrcKut07brRJIE/hNPHK0ynVJstCwWnc2OFe8jc+Ojbu6X vECQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=GghfFGTeByFroacaA0Xtw9fNo5ihAm5YXeFZc0caXC8=; b=hTpRoLvvlX8b2krdKmP4rVsXXOFU1Y2qgS6JvI1rHl8kATOGQ0b9PlXaLulYNNPBkE 858SENyimO4JbFSVoSbdDk+/0Hz9JtRAOc6ygsytohY+xDKI8HjWIM837flbwiunUD1n Gj7Ts0NaieUbFEvkViUjEAXPv5P2JVBMTFIJf7aT7I/Ndm/uFvEmCFGdrnrg91Bj50o+ P6pMlKkmZ+0TIdP6gQIPGlXSQWkB8CU2B6wc6Nct/C1cr8F7xofYIwOEYHdHU8LnT/lx XIXEpmSURhPgxwuqtQknes4Hf+jY6tjjmzEteieDYAr5kMX20QEMuFRRRi7LkmJ1zVpX 8t X-Received: by 10.140.97.200 with SMTP id m66mr221675qge.42.1424801490146; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:11:30 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Original-Received: by 10.140.90.239 with SMTP id x102ls2942022qgd.69.gmail; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:11:29 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.236.26.17 with SMTP id b17mr1603666yha.15.1424801489562; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:11:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com (mail-pa0-f43.google.com. [209.85.220.43]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id xj4si4264727pbc.2.2015.02.24.10.11.29 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:11:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jgm-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org designates 209.85.220.43 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.43; Original-Received: by pabrd3 with SMTP id rd3so37812646pab.4 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:11:29 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkGiyHsO7ivbSg1lyTxciQfWKLv89XajXGa4mrjQZcXEH60s9ZYhkdo5fyVH19U4xqJw63w X-Received: by 10.70.38.163 with SMTP id h3mr30798719pdk.95.1424801489311; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:11:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from johnmacfarlane.net (li55-134.members.linode.com. [74.82.3.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bw3sm38859895pbb.9.2015.02.24.10.11.27 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:11:27 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by johnmacfarlane.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 01619A31F; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:11:15 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <62149c61-fcbb-465d-b1ca-6d0b881c9072-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org> X-PGP-Key: http://johnmacfarlane.net/jgm.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Original-Sender: jgm-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jgm-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org designates 209.85.220.43 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jgm-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org Precedence: list Mailing-list: list pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org; contact pandoc-discuss+owners-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1007024079513 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.text.pandoc:12124 Archived-At: Personally, I don't see a problem with just using the Caption style for both kinds of captions (table and image). Is there a strong reason to use different styles? +++ Nikolay Yakimov [Feb 24 15 09:56 ]: > Thank you for your input, Matthew, John > I think this kind of concludes this discussion, since both of you are > in favor of #2, and I was leaning to it as well. > As for FootnoteRef and Link, I'll be sure to test for regressions to > the best of my ability. Not sure if I'll be able to fix underlying > issue, but I'll have to try to know for sure. > One point I'm still not sure about is captions. On one hand, > ImageCaption and TableCaption have semantic value, since they store > more information than just Caption style. On the other hand, there *is* > a style for captions already. > I'm thinking about having Caption in reference.docx and generating > ImageCaption and TableCaption in the same manner as, e.g. SourceCode, > basing them on Caption. This will have an added benefit of simplifying > getting captions in docx reader (something I was planning to tackle in > near future), since all captions, including Word-created ones, will be > based on the same style. Any objections? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "pandoc-discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [1]pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > To post to this group, send email to > [2]pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > To view this discussion on the web visit > [3]https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/62149c61-fcbb-465d- > b1ca-6d0b881c9072%40googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit [4]https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > >References > > 1. mailto:pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org > 2. mailto:pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org > 3. https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/62149c61-fcbb-465d-b1ca-6d0b881c9072-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer > 4. https://groups.google.com/d/optout