From: John MACFARLANE <jgm-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org>
To: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: docx -> markdown: image width and height doesn't respect --dpi?
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 17:13:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170829001310.GA75750@protagoras.berkeley.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <591842f3-2fcf-4a1b-b031-9b2c4f8dad05-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
With the dev version of pandoc, when I convert this to
Markdown I get:
> ![MacSSD:Users:kajohnson:Dropbox:Kinetics Book:Chapter 2:Table
> 2-1.png](foo/media/image1.png){width="4.616858048993876in"
> height="2.5in"}
So the Markdown writer doesn't convert the size to pixels;
if it's doing that for you, the behavior has been changed.
+++ Thomas Blom [Aug 28 17 08:57 ]:
> This is an excerpt from the document in question, which contains an
> image sized to be 4.65 inches wide, and results in a pixel width of 443
> no matter what --dpi I specify. The image is included in a block-quote
> section, which we use when we want to ident things because that is one
> of the few styling options that come across in markdown, but omitting
> this doesn't affect the width of the image.
> Thanks!
> On Monday, August 28, 2017 at 9:57:43 AM UTC-5, John MacFarlane wrote:
>
> Can you give us a simple docx file to test with?
> +++ Thomas Blom [Aug 27 17 20:21 ]:
> > Hi,
> > I convert docx to markdown using pandoc 1.19.2.1 on OSX 10.12
> with
> > pandoc -t markdown_strict --dpi=128 --extract-media=images
> mydoc.docx
> > -o [1]mydoc.md
> > I find that the image sizes in the markdown appear to be based
> on a
> > 96dpi image resolution no matter what --dpi I specify, and also
> no
> > matter the meta-data in the files embedded in the (word for mac
> 2011)
> > document (PNG, 144dpi).
> > For example, one image in Word has been sized by the author to
> be
> > ~4.65inches wide. The resulting markdown for this image
> specifies a
> > width of 443 pixels. So I see that markdown is using a dpi of
> 443/4.65
> > =~ 96 regardless of efforts on my part to change this.
> > I would like to adjust this because the images appear smaller at
> this
> > pixel size than the same images in Word. I can of course write
> a
> > post-processing script to adjust sizes on the markdown document,
> but
> > would prefer to avoid. It seems like the --dpi option makes
> sense to
> > address my situation?
> > Thanks,
> > Thomas Blom
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [2]pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To post to this group, send email to
> [3]pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> [4]https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/591842f3-2fcf-4a1b-
> b031-9b2c4f8dad05%40googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit [5]https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>References
>
> 1. http://mydoc.md/
> 2. mailto:pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
> 3. mailto:pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
> 4. https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/591842f3-2fcf-4a1b-b031-9b2c4f8dad05-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
> 5. https://groups.google.com/d/optout
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-29 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-28 3:21 Thomas Blom
[not found] ` <692f87e9-d992-4d10-a29a-77165f5d5771-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-28 14:57 ` John MacFarlane
[not found] ` <20170828145732.GI57370-9Rnp8PDaXcadBw3G0RLmbRFnWt+6NQIA@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-28 15:57 ` Thomas Blom
[not found] ` <591842f3-2fcf-4a1b-b031-9b2c4f8dad05-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-29 0:13 ` John MACFARLANE [this message]
[not found] ` <20170829001310.GA75750-nFAEphtLEs/fysO+viCLMa55KtNWUUjk@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-29 1:40 ` Thomas Blom
[not found] ` <11b99952-c27d-4a1a-b689-d0e915d886dc-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-29 6:09 ` John MacFarlane
[not found] ` <20170829060923.GF59266-9Rnp8PDaXcadBw3G0RLmbRFnWt+6NQIA@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-29 15:01 ` Thomas Blom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170829001310.GA75750@protagoras.berkeley.edu \
--to=jgm-tvlzxgkolnx2fbvcvol8/a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).