On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 2:14:33 PM UTC-5, John MacFarlane wrote:
>
> Yes, that's probably right.  Most fonts don't have a 
> complete set of Unicode glyphs. 
>

Thanks, John. For those that like the look, what's the closest font that 
does have this particular set? Or is there an easy(-ish) way to get the 
font to switch automatically for a certain range of characters or a 
language? (I'm almost completely latex incompetent.) 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To post to this group, send email to pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/20f5af55-daf5-443c-9c5f-085b4b816ce1%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.