public inbox archive for pandoc-discuss@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hgv <jbauchner-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Footnote with citations and multiple paragraphs using pandoc-citeproc
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:43:03 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <246e0391-eb53-40d3-bb59-dc1c97d94ebb@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140926210311.GB20437-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4599 bytes --]

OK yes—it seems like this difficulty has been bugging people all summer (my 
struggles began 
here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/pandoc-discuss/D-fD7phDB4w). 
One intermediate step would be to clarify the Read Me, so people stop 
trying to get pandoc-citeproc to work with citations in md footnotes. 

A larger solution might be in giving up the ability of pandoc-citeproc to 
produce either inline citations or note citations. I understand how useful 
this is, but if it doesn't actually work for one side of it (notes), I 
don't see the value. Of course, I only work with Chicago note-bibliography, 
which is where my bias comes from. But it seems to be designed primarily 
for those who work with Chicago author-date (and other inline styles), not 
really those who use both extensively. But as I'm sure this would entail a 
fair amount of work to just get back to where it is now, I understand the 
downsides.

Of course, I remain deeply grateful for pandoc overall, regardless of this 
issue.

On a related note, perhaps there are other humanists and fellow travelers 
on this board who use note citation styles (primarily Chicago 
note-bibliography, I'd assume) successfully with pandoc-citeproc—long 
footnotes and all? Any tips or workarounds?

On Friday, September 26, 2014 5:03:24 PM UTC-4, John MacFarlane wrote:
>
> There's also some relevant discussion at 
> <https://github.com/jgm/pandoc-citeproc/issues/82>. 
> It's an issue that comes up only for footnote styles:  how 
> to deal with citations that are already in footnotes? 
> Perhaps pandoc-citeproc can be improved here, but it's 
> not entirely clear what to do. 
>
>
> +++ Andrew Dunning [Sep 26 14 16:09 ]: 
> >I've run into the same problem, and it seems that it's not currently 
> possible; indeed, one cannot even have multi-sentence citations using 
> pandoc-citeproc. See <https://github.com/jgm/pandoc-citeproc/issues/69>. 
> > 
> >On 26 Sep 2014, at 2:50 p.m., hgv <jbau...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org <javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
> > 
> >> Hi all, 
> >> 
> >> Is there any way to use pandoc-citeproc to process citations 
> (specifically for chicago-fullnote-bibliography.csl for md to tex) and have 
> multiparagraph footnotes with citations in them? My understanding is that, 
> as pandoc-citeproc works to automatically make footnotes when called for by 
> the csl, all footnotes that have citations in them should be formatted only 
> with brackets, not in full md foonotes. But only an md footnote (not an 
> line one) can handle multiple paragraphs. Am I missing something? Sticking 
> pandoc citations in md footnotes (with or without brackets) produces 
> undesired results. Thanks! 
> >> 
> >> hgv 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group. 
> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org <javascript:>. 
> >> To post to this group, send email to pandoc-...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org 
> <javascript:>. 
> >> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/cf5b21a4-0495-47bc-872f-091626a4ef0a%40googlegroups.com. 
>
> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
> > 
> >-- 
> >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "pandoc-discuss" group. 
> >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org <javascript:>. 
> >To post to this group, send email to pandoc-...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org 
> <javascript:>. 
> >To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/3FDE0D22-3F5C-4471-9451-CD0FA4E96531%40gmail.com. 
>
> >For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To post to this group, send email to pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/246e0391-eb53-40d3-bb59-dc1c97d94ebb%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8239 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-09-26 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-26 18:50 hgv
     [not found] ` <cf5b21a4-0495-47bc-872f-091626a4ef0a-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-26 20:09   ` Andrew Dunning
     [not found]     ` <3FDE0D22-3F5C-4471-9451-CD0FA4E96531-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-26 21:03       ` John MacFarlane
     [not found]         ` <20140926210311.GB20437-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-26 21:43           ` hgv [this message]
     [not found]             ` <246e0391-eb53-40d3-bb59-dc1c97d94ebb-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-27  4:19               ` John MacFarlane
     [not found]                 ` <20140927041953.GA38502-bi+AKbBUZKbivNSvqvJHCtPlBySK3R6THiGdP5j34PU@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-27  8:47                   ` nickbart1980-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w
2014-09-30 12:22                   ` hgv
2014-09-30 20:54                   ` Jesse Rosenthal
2014-10-01  0:14                   ` Bruce D'Arcus
     [not found]                     ` <945be504-882b-46e8-b653-e373d579008b-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
2014-10-01  1:55                       ` Frank Bennett
     [not found]                         ` <d62aab34-b6d9-4aa9-a961-0534e601987b-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
2014-10-01 20:11                           ` Bruce D'Arcus
     [not found]                             ` <fe3c108a-8702-42f7-9309-fe3386f40b7b-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-01 20:44                               ` hgv

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=246e0391-eb53-40d3-bb59-dc1c97d94ebb@googlegroups.com \
    --to=jbauchner-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).