Re: Recursive citeproc with the multibib lua filter

["Bernardo C. D. A. Vasconcelos" <bernardovasconcelos-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2666 bytes --]

Hi Julien, I was looking through your code. Do you have a good idea about 
how to implement your recursive solution to the current 
multibib/multiple-bibliographies filter? Or do we need to rely on Albert's 
expertise in the multibib/multiple-bibliographies filter for this? 

While we're at this subject, I just noticed, after a full day's work trying 
to figure it out, that the filter will cause Quarto to hang indefinitively 
unless one adds `verbosity: ERROR` to opts. This does not affect Pandoc 
apparently.

On Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 11:40:39 AM UTC-3 Julien Dutant wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'd be interested in developing this feature for Pandoc-ext's multibib and 
> especially section-bibliographies and multi-bib (
> https://github.com/pandoc-ext/section-bibliographies), if Albert is 
> willing to consider the addition. I've already developed a recursive 
> bibliography filter:
> https://github.com/dialoa/dialectica-filters/tree/main/recursive-citeproc
> It's not the most efficient solution for more recent versions of Pandoc 
> (this was back in 2.6 I think, and my code isn't the most elegant), but it 
> works. 
>
> It was developed for the journal Dialectica, which has citations within 
> the bibliography. I'm thinking of porting dialectica to Quarto and make use 
> of section-bibliographies, so I'd be needing that feature anyway. 
>
> Against the inclusion of such a feature: citations within bibliography 
> entries are a Bib(La)Tex only feature, they may disappear as CSL/JSON takes 
> over.
>
> J
>
> On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 3:01:35 AM UTC Bernardo C. D. A. 
> Vasconcelos wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone, I hope you are all doing well.
>> Basically, this is a case of using the multi bib lua filter 
>> <https://github.com/pandoc-ext/multibib> with other citations within the 
>> bibliography. I was wondering if this could be pulled off. For context, one 
>> of the bibliography files is actually a glossary that could contain other 
>> citations in the `note` field of the BibTeX entry. Here is a MWE 
>> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/diiwwjds8kha214/Multibib.zip?dl=1> to 
>> illustrate what looks like in practice. What do you think?
>> Thanks,
>> Bernardo
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/2c4287ce-ddf0-40b0-94ac-5d22ab3d5764n%40googlegroups.com.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4555 bytes --]