From: 幻世子衍 <unrealyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: pandoc-discuss <pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: pandoc convert latex to jats Could not load include file
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 22:15:16 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c2fb287-b431-4d22-9c75-04922cdd572fn@googlegroups.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 35634 bytes --]
The full log:
pandoc -f latex -t jats_archiving main.tex --resource-path=. --verbose
[INFO] Could not load include file extsizes.sty at template.tex line 1
column 28
[INFO] Could not load include file multicol.sty at template.tex line 3
column 22
[INFO] Could not load include file amsmath.sty at template.tex line 4
column 21
[INFO] Could not load include file color.sty at template.tex line 6 column
19
[INFO] Could not load include file xcolor.sty at template.tex line 7 column
22
[INFO] Could not load include file hyperref.sty at template.tex line 8
column 62
[INFO] Could not load include file titlesec.sty at template.tex line 10
column 22
[INFO] Could not load include file authblk.sty at template.tex line 11
column 21
[INFO] Skipped '\definecolor{sectiontitlecolor}{rgb}{0.2,0.4,0.8}' at
template.tex line 14 column 50
[INFO] Skipped '\definecolor{editorial}{rgb}{0.08,0.28,0.53}' at
template.tex line 15 column 45
[INFO] Skipped '\definecolor{cite}{rgb}{0.98,0.9,0.8}' at template.tex line
16 column 38
[INFO] Could not load include file url.sty at template.tex line 19 column 17
[INFO] Could not load include file lipsum.sty at template.tex line 23
column 20
[INFO] Could not load include file geometry.sty at template.tex line 25
column 63
[INFO] Skipped '\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}' at template.tex line 28 column 25
[INFO] Could not load include file fancyhdr.sty at main.tex line 9 column 23
[INFO] Skipped '\pagestyle{fancy}' at main.tex line 12 column 18
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyhf{}' at main.tex line 15 column 11
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyhead[L]{\textbf{Translational Pediatrics, Vol 12, No
8 August 2023 }}' at main.tex line 18 column 76
[INFO] Skipped '\setcounter{page}{1450}' at main.tex line 23 column 24
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyhead[R]{\textbf{\thepage}}' at main.tex line 25
column 33
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyfoot[L]{© Translational Pediatrics. All rights
reserved. }' at main.tex line 33 column 65
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyfoot[R]{Transl Pediatr 2023;12(8):1450-1453 |
https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-264 }' at main.tex line 34 column 92
[INFO] Skipped '\thispagestyle{empty}' at main.tex line 40 column 22
[INFO] Skipped '\makeatletter' at main.tex line 43 column 14
[INFO] Skipped '\makeatother' at main.tex line 45 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\makeatletter' at main.tex line 47 column 14
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent' at main.tex line 102 column 14
[INFO] Skipped '\makebox[0.3\linewidth][l]{%
\setlength{\parskip}{1em} % 设置段落间距
\setlength{\parindent}{1em} % 设置段落缩进
\textcolor{white}{Editorial}
}' at main.tex line 106 column 6
[INFO] Skipped '\bgroup' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\LARGE' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\LARGE' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\@title' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\begin{flushleft}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\end{flushleft}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\@author' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\begin{flushleft}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\end{flushleft}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 134 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{\textit{Correspondence to:} Frank-Martin Haecker,
MD, Professor of Pediatric Surgery. Chest Wall Unit at the Department of
Pediatric Surgery, Children’s
Hospital of Eastern Switzerland, Claudiusstrasse 6, CH-9006 St. Gallen,
Switzerland. Email: frank-martin.haecker-kpaEHHRHYO5yDzI6CaY1VQ@public.gmane.org}' at main.tex line 140
column 125
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{\textit{Comment on}: Scalise PN, Demehri FR. The
management of pectus excavatum in pediatric patients: a narrative review.
Transl Pediatr 2023;12:208-20.}' at main.tex line 142 column 149
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 144 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{\textbf{\textcolor[RGB]{21,72,135}{Keywords:}}
Pectus excavatum; pediatric patients; Nuss procedure; vacuum bell;
cryoablation}' at main.tex line 145 column 95
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 147 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{Submitted Apr 26, 2023. Accepted for publication
Jul 19, 2023. Published online Jul 28, 2023}' at main.tex line 149 column 99
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{doi: 10.21037/tp-23-264}' at main.tex line 151
column 29
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{\textbf{View this article at: }}' at main.tex
line 153 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{4ex}' at main.tex line 155 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\indent ' at main.tex line 159 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\indent ' at main.tex line 159 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\indent ' at main.tex line 159 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\indent ' at main.tex line 159 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\normalfont' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\Large' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\normalfont' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\Large' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{1ex}' at main.tex line 322 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 329 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 336 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\begin{multicols}{2}
{
\indent The majority of congenital chest wall deformities (CWD)
affects the anterior chest wall. The most common anterior
CWD is pectus excavatum (PE), followed by Pectus
carinatum (PC). The incidence of PE is approximately
1 in every 300–400 births, affecting male patients with
an approx. 4:1 ratio (\cite{pmid36891368}). For the last 70 to 80 years,
open
surgical repair such as the Ravitch technique and its
modifications (\cite{pmid35820596,pmid35455522}) was the preferred method
to correct
CWDs. An essential paradigm shift occurred with the
inauguration of the minimally invasive repair of pectus
excavatum (MIRPE) by Nuss (\cite{pmid35377161}). In contrast to open
repair, MIRPE does not require cartilage or sternal
resection. Flexibility and elasticity of the chest wall which
are preserved applying MIRPE, were identified as relevant
parameters for successful treatment of CWD. Furthermore,
an increasing number of patients presented with thoracic
chondrodystrophy as a long-term side effect after open
surgical repair. As a consequence, the management of CWD
including diagnostic work-up as well as conservative and
surgical treatment options has made substantial progress
during the past two decades. Today, treatment of CWD
includes all age groups with pediatric, adolescent and adult
patients, covered by a dedicated multidisciplinary team
(in particular pediatric and thoracic surgeons) based in a
specialized chest wall unit, what is the most important pillar
of present time.
The physiologic effects of CWD are still discussed
controversially. There is an ongoing controversial debate
concerning effects of MIRPE on exercise tolerance, lack
of endurance, shortness of breath, cardiopulmonary
function, body posture, etc. Even if the number of articles
reporting on different aspects of CWD treatment went
up from approximately 300 (1980 to 1989) to more than
1,000 published papers (2012 to 2021), the controversial
debate will continue (\cite{pmid34942673}). Information on new diagnostic
and therapeutic modalities provided by online platforms
and social media circulates not only among surgeons
and paediatricians, but also rapidly among patients. Not
only different surgical techniques, but also conservative
treatment options are available. In almost the same manner,
postoperative pain management is an important part of
an effective and successful treatment protocol. Several
modifications were introduced over the past years. For a
long time, regional analgesia such as paravertebral nerve
blocks or catheters, epidurals as well as patient-controlled
analgesia (PCA) represented the preferred anesthesia
method. Nowadays, cryoablation became a more and
more applied alternative technique (\cite{pmid33853733,pmid32753276}).
Cryoablation
may be applied thoracoscopically during MIRPE (\cite{pmid31600804}), or as
ultrasound guided percutaneous intercostal injection
(\cite{pmid31199434}).
After its introduction, MIRPE was well established
in the first decade of this century and subsequently
performed with increasing frequency worldwide. Today,
MIRPE represents the worldwide used “gold-standard”
for surgical repair of PE. Applying the technique in
different age groups, the method experienced numerous
modifications. Modifications include patient selection
and indication, preoperative evaluation, as well as age
at time of surgical repair. Positioning of the patient on
the OR table, intubation (single lumen vs. double lumen
tubus) were modified. Number, location and size of skin
incisions, shape/size or number of bars and bar fixation as
well as bar passage (intra vs. extrapleural placement) were
modified (\cite{pmid29672193}). To reduce the risk of secondary bar
displacement and/or to correct complex CWDs, placement
of more than 1 bar including the so called cross-bar
technique was introduced (\cite{pmid28822540}).
Two fundamental techniques were introduced to reduce
the risk of intraoperative cardiac injuries: routine unilateral
and/or bilateral thoracoscopy (\cite{pmid25814003}), and routine sternal
elevation (\cite{pmid18582824,pmid11877663}). Whereas in the initial
publication by
Nuss retrosternal dissection was described as “blunt” using
a long-curved clamp without thoracoscopy (4), the same
group reported their experience using routine thoracoscopy
4 years later, achieving improved safety during mediastinal
dissection (\cite{pmid10803339}). In particular the risk of cardiac
perforation
as the most severe complication could be decreased with
the routine use of thoracoscopic guidance (\cite{pmid9574749}). Even
more than 2 decades after its introduction there is no
evidence-based data available concerning the protective
effect of thoracoscopy on the true incidence of near fatal
complications like cardiac injuries. However, the majority of
articles and studies reporting on catastrophic complications
were all published before 2011 (5). Furthermore, the
widespread use of routine intraoperative sternal elevation
must be considered as an additional effective measure
to improve safety of MIRPE (13).
Visualization across
the mediastinum during retrosternal dissection may be
compromised in severe defects. Notably in older adult PE
patients, decreased flexibility and stiffness of the anterior
chest wall as well as the corresponding force required
to elevate the sternum may make retrosternal dissection
difficult and sometimes nearby impossible. Applying routine
sternal elevation during MIRPE, the safety of the procedure
has improved clearly as there was no near-fatal and/or fatal
incident reported anymore when the technique was applied
intraoperatively (13).
Evolution in the management of congenital CWD and
modifications of newly introduced techniques have made
significant progress over the past 2–3 decades, and as a
consequence patients outcome improved substantially.
The aim of the narrative review presented by Scalise and
Demehri (\cite{pmid18582824}) is to outline current practice concerning
diagnostic work-up, conservative and surgical treatment
as well as management in general of pediatric PE patients.
Since we may find numerous publications dealing with this
topic, it is nearby impossible to review all the literature,
covering all different age groups. In particular no
randomized double-blind studies are available. Therefore,
the quality of evidence regarding this topic remains
relatively low with still many unexplored and unknown
pathways. Different objective criteria were screened, verified
and added to identify PE patients that would benefit from
surgery. An increasing number of studies accentuating the
cardiopulmonary consequences of PE. Notably, more than
275 papers have been published in the last 10 years focusing
on functional changes prior to and after surgical correction
of PE. Due to different reasons (e.g., retrospective and/or
small cohort studies), the results are still heterogenous and
of low evidential quality (\cite{pmid18582824}). Based on this generally
poor
evidence, the controversial debate on the cardiopulmonary
impact of PE and whether patients may benefit from
surgical repair or not will continue as long as we may be
able to provide double blind randomized studies. However,
IRB approval for such a study has to be considered as
difficult or nearby impossible. This is aggravated by the
fact that PE is many times considered as an “only” esthetic
disorder and in particular associated with body image
disturbances. In contrast, among surgeons and confirmed
by recently published studies it is clearly acknowledged
that subjective improvement in exercise intolerance is
often reported after MIRPE (\cite{pmid18582824}). Thus, despite above
mentioned facts as well as current believes, reviews such as
presented by Scalise and Demehri may help to bridge the
lack of convincing high-quality evidence which remains a
critical concern that could potentially interfere with future
management of PE. As concluded by Scalise and Demehri
in their narrative review, there is still a lack of international
consensus guidelines concerning preoperative diagnostic
work-up, conservative and surgical treatment as well as
postoperative management. A recently published study
by Janssen et al. reported on a consensus statement for
perioperative care for PE based on a multi-round Delphi
survey (\cite{pmid18582824}). Pectus surgeons all around the world are
encouraged to draw up standardized consensus guidelines to
establish a high-level algorithm for preoperative diagnostic
protocol, indications for conservative and/or surgical
treatment as well as postoperative management.
}
\amesection{Acknowledgments}
Funding: None.
\amesection{Footnot}
\textit{Provenance and Peer Review:} This article was commissioned
by the editorial office, Translational Pediatrics. The article
did not undergo external peer review.
\vspace{1ex}
\textit{Conflicts of Interest: }The author has completed the ICMJE
uniform disclosure form (available at \url{https://tp.amegroups.
com/article/view/10.21037/tp-23-264/coif} ). The author has
no conflicts of interest to declare.
\vspace{2ex}
\textit{Ethical Statement:} The author is accountable for all
aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related
to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are
appropriately investigated and resolved.
\vspace{2ex}
\textit{Open Access Statement:} This is an Open Access article
distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International
License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-
commercial replication and distribution of the article with
the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the
original work is properly cited (including links to both the
formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license).
See:
\href{https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0}{https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0}
Let's cite! Einstein's journal paper and Dirac's book \cite{dirac} are
physics-related items.
\titleformat{\section}
{\color{sectiontitlecolor}\normalfont\Large\bfseries}
{\thesection}{1em}{}
\bibliographystyle{unsrt}
\bibliography{main}
%
\cite{pmid18582824,pmid10803339,pmid9574749,pmid35455522,pmid31600804,pmid29672193,pmid33853733,pmid34942673,pmid35820596,pmid25814003,pmid31199434,pmid32753276,pmid11877663,pmid28822540,pmid36891368,pmid35377161}
% 在文中插入引用信息
\noindent\colorbox{cite}{
% \begin{minipage}{\dimexpr\textwidth-2\fboxsep} %单栏模式
\begin{minipage}{\dimexpr0.5\textwidth-2\fboxsep}
\setlength{\parskip}{0em} % 设置段落间距
\setlength{\parindent}{0em} % 设置段落缩进
Cite this article as: Haecker FM. Evolution in the management of
pectus excavatum in pediatric patients. Transl Pediatr
2023;12(8):1450-1453. doi: 10.21037/tp-23-264
\end{minipage}}
\end{multicols}' at main.tex line 157 column 22
<p> <styled-content style="background-color: editorial">
</styled-content> </p>
<boxed-text>
<p><bold></bold></p>
</boxed-text>
<boxed-text>
<p><bold></bold></p>
</boxed-text>
<p>https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-264</p>
root@983a0296ac13:/usr/src/app/server/files/0976f9f8-c926-4d7b-afc2-ea95fbc7d486/store#
pandoc -f latex -t jats_archiving main.tex
--resource-path=/usr/src/app/server/files/0976f9f8-c926-4d7b-afc2-ea95fbc7d486/store
--verbose
[INFO] Could not load include file extsizes.sty at template.tex line 1
column 28
[INFO] Could not load include file multicol.sty at template.tex line 3
column 22
[INFO] Could not load include file amsmath.sty at template.tex line 4
column 21
[INFO] Could not load include file color.sty at template.tex line 6 column
19
[INFO] Could not load include file xcolor.sty at template.tex line 7 column
22
[INFO] Could not load include file hyperref.sty at template.tex line 8
column 62
[INFO] Could not load include file titlesec.sty at template.tex line 10
column 22
[INFO] Could not load include file authblk.sty at template.tex line 11
column 21
[INFO] Skipped '\definecolor{sectiontitlecolor}{rgb}{0.2,0.4,0.8}' at
template.tex line 14 column 50
[INFO] Skipped '\definecolor{editorial}{rgb}{0.08,0.28,0.53}' at
template.tex line 15 column 45
[INFO] Skipped '\definecolor{cite}{rgb}{0.98,0.9,0.8}' at template.tex line
16 column 38
[INFO] Could not load include file url.sty at template.tex line 19 column 17
[INFO] Could not load include file lipsum.sty at template.tex line 23
column 20
[INFO] Could not load include file geometry.sty at template.tex line 25
column 63
[INFO] Skipped '\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}' at template.tex line 28 column 25
[INFO] Could not load include file fancyhdr.sty at main.tex line 9 column 23
[INFO] Skipped '\pagestyle{fancy}' at main.tex line 12 column 18
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyhf{}' at main.tex line 15 column 11
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyhead[L]{\textbf{Translational Pediatrics, Vol 12, No
8 August 2023 }}' at main.tex line 18 column 76
[INFO] Skipped '\setcounter{page}{1450}' at main.tex line 23 column 24
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyhead[R]{\textbf{\thepage}}' at main.tex line 25
column 33
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyfoot[L]{© Translational Pediatrics. All rights
reserved. }' at main.tex line 33 column 65
[INFO] Skipped '\fancyfoot[R]{Transl Pediatr 2023;12(8):1450-1453 |
https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-264 }' at main.tex line 34 column 92
[INFO] Skipped '\thispagestyle{empty}' at main.tex line 40 column 22
[INFO] Skipped '\makeatletter' at main.tex line 43 column 14
[INFO] Skipped '\makeatother' at main.tex line 45 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\makeatletter' at main.tex line 47 column 14
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent' at main.tex line 102 column 14
[INFO] Skipped '\makebox[0.3\linewidth][l]{%
\setlength{\parskip}{1em} % 设置段落间距
\setlength{\parindent}{1em} % 设置段落缩进
\textcolor{white}{Editorial}
}' at main.tex line 106 column 6
[INFO] Skipped '\bgroup' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\LARGE' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\LARGE' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\@title' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\begin{flushleft}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\end{flushleft}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\@author' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\begin{flushleft}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\end{flushleft}' at main.tex line 129 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 134 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{\textit{Correspondence to:} Frank-Martin Haecker,
MD, Professor of Pediatric Surgery. Chest Wall Unit at the Department of
Pediatric Surgery, Children’s
Hospital of Eastern Switzerland, Claudiusstrasse 6, CH-9006 St. Gallen,
Switzerland. Email: frank-martin.haecker-kpaEHHRHYO5yDzI6CaY1VQ@public.gmane.org}' at main.tex line 140
column 125
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{\textit{Comment on}: Scalise PN, Demehri FR. The
management of pectus excavatum in pediatric patients: a narrative review.
Transl Pediatr 2023;12:208-20.}' at main.tex line 142 column 149
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 144 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{\textbf{\textcolor[RGB]{21,72,135}{Keywords:}}
Pectus excavatum; pediatric patients; Nuss procedure; vacuum bell;
cryoablation}' at main.tex line 145 column 95
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 147 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{Submitted Apr 26, 2023. Accepted for publication
Jul 19, 2023. Published online Jul 28, 2023}' at main.tex line 149 column 99
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{doi: 10.21037/tp-23-264}' at main.tex line 151
column 29
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent{\textbf{View this article at: }}' at main.tex
line 153 column 5
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{4ex}' at main.tex line 155 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\indent ' at main.tex line 159 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\indent ' at main.tex line 159 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\indent ' at main.tex line 159 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\indent ' at main.tex line 159 column 13
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\normalfont' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\Large' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 312 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\noindent' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\normalfont' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\Large' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 316 column 4
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{1ex}' at main.tex line 322 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 329 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\vspace{2ex}' at main.tex line 336 column 17
[INFO] Skipped '\begin{multicols}{2}
{
\indent The majority of congenital chest wall deformities (CWD)
affects the anterior chest wall. The most common anterior
CWD is pectus excavatum (PE), followed by Pectus
carinatum (PC). The incidence of PE is approximately
1 in every 300–400 births, affecting male patients with
an approx. 4:1 ratio (\cite{pmid36891368}). For the last 70 to 80 years,
open
surgical repair such as the Ravitch technique and its
modifications (\cite{pmid35820596,pmid35455522}) was the preferred method
to correct
CWDs. An essential paradigm shift occurred with the
inauguration of the minimally invasive repair of pectus
excavatum (MIRPE) by Nuss (\cite{pmid35377161}). In contrast to open
repair, MIRPE does not require cartilage or sternal
resection. Flexibility and elasticity of the chest wall which
are preserved applying MIRPE, were identified as relevant
parameters for successful treatment of CWD. Furthermore,
an increasing number of patients presented with thoracic
chondrodystrophy as a long-term side effect after open
surgical repair. As a consequence, the management of CWD
including diagnostic work-up as well as conservative and
surgical treatment options has made substantial progress
during the past two decades. Today, treatment of CWD
includes all age groups with pediatric, adolescent and adult
patients, covered by a dedicated multidisciplinary team
(in particular pediatric and thoracic surgeons) based in a
specialized chest wall unit, what is the most important pillar
of present time.
The physiologic effects of CWD are still discussed
controversially. There is an ongoing controversial debate
concerning effects of MIRPE on exercise tolerance, lack
of endurance, shortness of breath, cardiopulmonary
function, body posture, etc. Even if the number of articles
reporting on different aspects of CWD treatment went
up from approximately 300 (1980 to 1989) to more than
1,000 published papers (2012 to 2021), the controversial
debate will continue (\cite{pmid34942673}). Information on new diagnostic
and therapeutic modalities provided by online platforms
and social media circulates not only among surgeons
and paediatricians, but also rapidly among patients. Not
only different surgical techniques, but also conservative
treatment options are available. In almost the same manner,
postoperative pain management is an important part of
an effective and successful treatment protocol. Several
modifications were introduced over the past years. For a
long time, regional analgesia such as paravertebral nerve
blocks or catheters, epidurals as well as patient-controlled
analgesia (PCA) represented the preferred anesthesia
method. Nowadays, cryoablation became a more and
more applied alternative technique (\cite{pmid33853733,pmid32753276}).
Cryoablation
may be applied thoracoscopically during MIRPE (\cite{pmid31600804}), or as
ultrasound guided percutaneous intercostal injection
(\cite{pmid31199434}).
After its introduction, MIRPE was well established
in the first decade of this century and subsequently
performed with increasing frequency worldwide. Today,
MIRPE represents the worldwide used “gold-standard”
for surgical repair of PE. Applying the technique in
different age groups, the method experienced numerous
modifications. Modifications include patient selection
and indication, preoperative evaluation, as well as age
at time of surgical repair. Positioning of the patient on
the OR table, intubation (single lumen vs. double lumen
tubus) were modified. Number, location and size of skin
incisions, shape/size or number of bars and bar fixation as
well as bar passage (intra vs. extrapleural placement) were
modified (\cite{pmid29672193}). To reduce the risk of secondary bar
displacement and/or to correct complex CWDs, placement
of more than 1 bar including the so called cross-bar
technique was introduced (\cite{pmid28822540}).
Two fundamental techniques were introduced to reduce
the risk of intraoperative cardiac injuries: routine unilateral
and/or bilateral thoracoscopy (\cite{pmid25814003}), and routine sternal
elevation (\cite{pmid18582824,pmid11877663}). Whereas in the initial
publication by
Nuss retrosternal dissection was described as “blunt” using
a long-curved clamp without thoracoscopy (4), the same
group reported their experience using routine thoracoscopy
4 years later, achieving improved safety during mediastinal
dissection (\cite{pmid10803339}). In particular the risk of cardiac
perforation
as the most severe complication could be decreased with
the routine use of thoracoscopic guidance (\cite{pmid9574749}). Even
more than 2 decades after its introduction there is no
evidence-based data available concerning the protective
effect of thoracoscopy on the true incidence of near fatal
complications like cardiac injuries. However, the majority of
articles and studies reporting on catastrophic complications
were all published before 2011 (5). Furthermore, the
widespread use of routine intraoperative sternal elevation
must be considered as an additional effective measure
to improve safety of MIRPE (13).
Visualization across
the mediastinum during retrosternal dissection may be
compromised in severe defects. Notably in older adult PE
patients, decreased flexibility and stiffness of the anterior
chest wall as well as the corresponding force required
to elevate the sternum may make retrosternal dissection
difficult and sometimes nearby impossible. Applying routine
sternal elevation during MIRPE, the safety of the procedure
has improved clearly as there was no near-fatal and/or fatal
incident reported anymore when the technique was applied
intraoperatively (13).
Evolution in the management of congenital CWD and
modifications of newly introduced techniques have made
significant progress over the past 2–3 decades, and as a
consequence patients outcome improved substantially.
The aim of the narrative review presented by Scalise and
Demehri (\cite{pmid18582824}) is to outline current practice concerning
diagnostic work-up, conservative and surgical treatment
as well as management in general of pediatric PE patients.
Since we may find numerous publications dealing with this
topic, it is nearby impossible to review all the literature,
covering all different age groups. In particular no
randomized double-blind studies are available. Therefore,
the quality of evidence regarding this topic remains
relatively low with still many unexplored and unknown
pathways. Different objective criteria were screened, verified
and added to identify PE patients that would benefit from
surgery. An increasing number of studies accentuating the
cardiopulmonary consequences of PE. Notably, more than
275 papers have been published in the last 10 years focusing
on functional changes prior to and after surgical correction
of PE. Due to different reasons (e.g., retrospective and/or
small cohort studies), the results are still heterogenous and
of low evidential quality (\cite{pmid18582824}). Based on this generally
poor
evidence, the controversial debate on the cardiopulmonary
impact of PE and whether patients may benefit from
surgical repair or not will continue as long as we may be
able to provide double blind randomized studies. However,
IRB approval for such a study has to be considered as
difficult or nearby impossible. This is aggravated by the
fact that PE is many times considered as an “only” esthetic
disorder and in particular associated with body image
disturbances. In contrast, among surgeons and confirmed
by recently published studies it is clearly acknowledged
that subjective improvement in exercise intolerance is
often reported after MIRPE (\cite{pmid18582824}). Thus, despite above
mentioned facts as well as current believes, reviews such as
presented by Scalise and Demehri may help to bridge the
lack of convincing high-quality evidence which remains a
critical concern that could potentially interfere with future
management of PE. As concluded by Scalise and Demehri
in their narrative review, there is still a lack of international
consensus guidelines concerning preoperative diagnostic
work-up, conservative and surgical treatment as well as
postoperative management. A recently published study
by Janssen et al. reported on a consensus statement for
perioperative care for PE based on a multi-round Delphi
survey (\cite{pmid18582824}). Pectus surgeons all around the world are
encouraged to draw up standardized consensus guidelines to
establish a high-level algorithm for preoperative diagnostic
protocol, indications for conservative and/or surgical
treatment as well as postoperative management.
}
\amesection{Acknowledgments}
Funding: None.
\amesection{Footnot}
\textit{Provenance and Peer Review:} This article was commissioned
by the editorial office, Translational Pediatrics. The article
did not undergo external peer review.
\vspace{1ex}
\textit{Conflicts of Interest: }The author has completed the ICMJE
uniform disclosure form (available at \url{https://tp.amegroups.
com/article/view/10.21037/tp-23-264/coif} ). The author has
no conflicts of interest to declare.
\vspace{2ex}
\textit{Ethical Statement:} The author is accountable for all
aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related
to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are
appropriately investigated and resolved.
\vspace{2ex}
\textit{Open Access Statement:} This is an Open Access article
distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International
License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-
commercial replication and distribution of the article with
the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the
original work is properly cited (including links to both the
formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license).
See:
\href{https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0}{https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0}
Let's cite! Einstein's journal paper and Dirac's book \cite{dirac} are
physics-related items.
\titleformat{\section}
{\color{sectiontitlecolor}\normalfont\Large\bfseries}
{\thesection}{1em}{}
\bibliographystyle{unsrt}
\bibliography{main}
%
\cite{pmid18582824,pmid10803339,pmid9574749,pmid35455522,pmid31600804,pmid29672193,pmid33853733,pmid34942673,pmid35820596,pmid25814003,pmid31199434,pmid32753276,pmid11877663,pmid28822540,pmid36891368,pmid35377161}
% 在文中插入引用信息
\noindent\colorbox{cite}{
% \begin{minipage}{\dimexpr\textwidth-2\fboxsep} %单栏模式
\begin{minipage}{\dimexpr0.5\textwidth-2\fboxsep}
\setlength{\parskip}{0em} % 设置段落间距
\setlength{\parindent}{0em} % 设置段落缩进
Cite this article as: Haecker FM. Evolution in the management of
pectus excavatum in pediatric patients. Transl Pediatr
2023;12(8):1450-1453. doi: 10.21037/tp-23-264
\end{minipage}}
\end{multicols}' at main.tex line 157 column 22
<p> <styled-content style="background-color: editorial">
</styled-content> </p>
<boxed-text>
<p><bold></bold></p>
</boxed-text>
<boxed-text>
<p><bold></bold></p>
</boxed-text>
<p>https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-264</p>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/3c2fb287-b431-4d22-9c75-04922cdd572fn%40googlegroups.com.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 38883 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2023-11-22 6:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-22 6:15 幻世子衍 [this message]
[not found] ` <3c2fb287-b431-4d22-9c75-04922cdd572fn-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
2023-11-23 3:35 ` John MacFarlane
[not found] ` <9D3E1DD3-1A8C-4AB1-8772-74A7245636AA-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2023-11-23 8:12 ` 幻世子衍
[not found] ` <CAC_9v0bJn_+Dhg=N0JLVCDqVcv1xp8Lk-O4xbSmbBHBYP-KC2A-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2023-11-23 8:14 ` 幻世子衍
[not found] ` <c916761a-23e9-43d0-b7b3-ff198d13a4c9n-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
2023-11-24 13:49 ` John MacFarlane
2023-11-23 8:13 ` 幻世子衍
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3c2fb287-b431-4d22-9c75-04922cdd572fn@googlegroups.com \
--to=unrealyan-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).