Re: Conversion of underbrace (to and from Word)

[Emma Cliffe <e.h.cliffe-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2725 bytes --]


And, in case it is useful, the MathML:
<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block">
  <mrow>
    <munder class="msub">
      <mrow>
    <munder accentunder="false">
      <mrow> 
        <mi>x</mi>
        <mi>x</mi>
        <mi>x</mi>
        <mo class="MathClass-op">&#x2026;</mo>
        <mi>x</mi>
        <mi>x</mi>
      </mrow>
      <mo>&#xFE38;</mo>
      </munder> 
      </mrow>
      <mrow>
    <mi>n</mi>
    </mrow>
    </munder>
  </mrow>
</math>

This is rendered correctly by MathJax and by Firefox native rendering. If I 
transform that using pandoc to LaTeX, for instance, I get:
\[\underset{n}{\underset{\}\ }{xxx\ldots xx}}\]
This renders in the same unexpected manner as the Word rendering when going 
the other way. 

Thanks,
Emma

On Tuesday, 3 October 2017 10:36:44 UTC+1, Emma Cliffe wrote:
>
>
> Morning,
>
> I am having trouble getting pandoc to convert underbrace either into Word 
> or out of Word. I wondered if there is either something I am doing wrong, 
> whether this is a known problem (I can't find a report) or if there is a 
> work round for converting into Word. 
>
> If I try to convert:
> \[
> \underbrace{xxx\ldots xx}_n
> \]
> for instance then what I get in Word (linear format) is:
> ((xxx…xx)┬⏟)┬n
> which does not render as a stretched underbrace.
>
> I would expect to get:
> ⏟(xxx…xx)┬n
> which is typed directly into Word as \underbrace(xxx\ldots xx)_n (then 
> space to trigger). You get the same linear interpretation if you use the 
> mouse to create the structure.
>
> The above is the direction I am interested in. I am actually converting 
> from MathML and see the same behaviour as in the cut down test of md or tex 
> to docx I have explained above. 
>
> For completeness I tried to convert in the other direction. Starting from 
> the above structure in Word I end up with:
> \[\underset{n}{}\]
> which has not only lost the xxx...xx but underbrace has become underset 
> which is not the same thing. 
>
> Does anyone know anything more about this? 
>
> Many thanks,
> Emma
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To post to this group, send email to pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/3d9489bc-eb47-465f-8096-56fe82dde46e%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3633 bytes --]