AFAIK I didn’t see people doing this (but I could be wrong). Just to point out some problems of AMP: - Daring Fireball: The Problem With AMP - The Guardian pulls out of Facebook’s Instant Articles and Apple News - Digiday (I read the news somewhere else and googled this for your reference) The 2nd news seems to suggest that AMP is doing better among the 3. But the point is that all 3 efforts are about lock-in, and who knows in 10 years if it will still be there (in contrast with other formats that pandoc supports). For big news companies they can afford throwing a lot of resources to test the water and reap near-term benefits. But for indie publishing and open-source projects, you might not have the resource to do so, and if you do, the resource might be best spent somewhere else. (It also depends on how much effort is needed. For experienced pandoc developer, it might not be a lot. The question is if you can find experienced pandoc developer who is interested in this, or if you’re willing to be that one.) ​ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To post to this group, send email to pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/436da55e-15b1-4571-8716-bc35ae061e22%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.