I'm sorry for digging up this old thread. Please let me know if I should start a new one.
On Friday, January 24, 2014 at 1:54:49 AM UTC+5:30, John MacFarlane wrote:
> I then did the following:
> $ ~/.cabal/bin/pandoc
> /home/sol/articles/2014-01-14_invisible-censorship-a-look-at-indias-information-technology-act_yaml.txt
> --filter ~/.cabal/bin/pandoc-citeproc
> --bibliography=/home/sol/articles/biblio.bib
> --csl=/home/sol/articles/bluebook.csl -o
> ~/articles/2014-01-14_invisible-censorship-a-look-at-indias-information-technology-act_yaml.odt
> -s -S
>
> For some reason, the citations aren't working properly. I've tried
> with both bluebook.csl[1] and amlaw.csl[2]. The latter, though it is
> a more up-to-date version of the Bluebook format (with support for
> automatic filling in of note numbers in *supra* note #), apparently
> has problems working with anything but Multi-Lingual Zotero (a fork of
> the regular one) so can't be expected to work with pandoc-citeproc.
>
> But if I use bluebook.csl, I'm getting the following as a citation:
>
> Lawrence Liang, *Reasonable restrictions and unreasonable speech*,*in*
> <smallcaps>Sarai reader 4: Crisis/Media</smallcaps> (Jeebesh Bagchi et
> al., 2004)
>
> While Zotero is creating the entry correctly:
>
> Lawrence Liang, *Reasonable Restrictions and Unreasonable Speech*,
> *in* <smallcaps>Sarai Reader 4: Crisis/Media</smallcaps> (Jeebesh
> Bagchi et al. eds., 2004)
So the problems are: (1) no space before *in*, (2) no titlecase
in titles, (3) no "eds."?
In short: yes. Since last year, (1) and (3) seem to have been fixed. (2) still hasn't.
Also, see: http://pandoc.org/csltest/bluebook-law-review.html
Many of the examples don't work, since the Bluebook law review citation style only uses footnotes, and doesn't use inline notes.