From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.text.pandoc/12004 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Oliver Newsgroups: gmane.text.pandoc Subject: Re: Please give the Docx reader a test drive Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 04:41:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4eff1e01-41bb-409f-8835-c5d47c8060f1@googlegroups.com> References: <871tsmwv2h.fsf@jhu.edu> Reply-To: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_255_1966441635.1423831313414" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423831331 13135 80.91.229.3 (13 Feb 2015 12:42:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:42:11 +0000 (UTC) To: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Original-X-From: pandoc-discuss+bncBDNMZGP454ORBEPC66TAKGQENOW5KPA-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Fri Feb 13 13:41:55 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gtp-pandoc-discuss@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-qa0-f55.google.com ([209.85.216.55]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YMFZC-0006D5-Nk for gtp-pandoc-discuss@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:41:54 +0100 Original-Received: by mail-qa0-f55.google.com with SMTP id i13sf4115695qae.0 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 04:41:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=WSxPEPFGArgK9F7ZuYAgSphBa0m8brNht80Q+QiE5c0=; b=hGb8WMSXe3pzPS1g4Koeo7tJuc2PqgLYSfP3Ri6f/cbhR+F+owvSo3L6v0YshaBtyw Ggm2f7W8aQ4HdCwDeOX5TAbPt4LzwcBJSX9Yb4VPWAkNHL3CycjfwP7Ix9pBrrPN44Z7 fnUI7T+m8IcAYdFfq3zjSJqCy9Os2JD5lGMwYR3SIkN8K3erbXC+z+d1WnAx+0rCcgfW kkk/ZZXrLsx0asQ50sEOtJgMDn5Tw+Q/vQjt7c/8pucC+SM7Rw9lx/uFJtwZEpbl8XRx Et8VUvKSk8/9O8tOk0f21yj+Hc8sHmO6LnMSBPxy2Pgwgb8CWDUStehFWQHsQS9xNoeG z3ug== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=WSxPEPFGArgK9F7ZuYAgSphBa0m8brNht80Q+QiE5c0=; b=UJtffjWy5yYhjPPv7a4Jx5w/+sf5K27Ct67cZVLR9JsxaausbgCFnRshaeskV4fN0D kls+XkdF+a74xjoM2JgozhdojVniRgDsZfx9+1ZlR3MTivoVr7P7b6KBfrQw4O/t5U2d aMvR2HsH+ZL/SRaF/3yWrKkXe+DCmswmLgboQFTFtmMGNCKRl84B6PM+z4rIHqHAjef7 t2ppcbDHeUNCAPX5Nv7uWp1Ydl3U3CgVn70qMEcAyd6V6X5LUoSlDlvNqYrN81wCtdFB xXCyxXbUYTHqmduR0OZgk+Uocteh6WjlBj/qLrt9/2XyjkrKxXmMRmk8aj6X4J0fKxrk Go/A== X-Received: by 10.140.48.97 with SMTP id n88mr109532qga.35.1423831314120; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 04:41:54 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Original-Received: by 10.140.38.167 with SMTP id t36ls1404561qgt.68.gmail; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 04:41:53 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.104.174 with SMTP id a43mr113866qgf.2.1423831313815; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 04:41:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: olidew-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Precedence: list Mailing-list: list pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org; contact pandoc-discuss+owners-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1007024079513 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.text.pandoc:12004 Archived-At: ------=_Part_255_1966441635.1423831313414 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_256_211232115.1423831313414" ------=_Part_256_211232115.1423831313414 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Friday, February 13, 2015 at 12:36:40 PM UTC, Oliver wrote: > > Hello, the DocX to md reader seems to be working really well. I think that > the Pandoc documentation however is a little confusing regarding the > track-changes options. It states: > > --track-changes=*accept|reject|all*... *accept* (the default), inserts >> all insertions, and ignores all deletions. *reject* inserts all >> deletions and ignores insertions. *all* puts in both insertions and >> deletions, wrapped in spans with insertion and deletion classes, >> respectively. > > > maybe this is semantic quibbling, but to me "ignores all deletions" makes > it sound as if the deletion is not being respected (ie the deleted text > will be present), while "inserts all deletions" makes it sound as if the > deleted text is being put back in EDIT, actually this is what reject does. > It is just the definition of "accept" that I find counter-intuitive. I > think it would be clearer if it followed Word's nomenclature (even at the > risk of being a circular definition), and said something like "accept > accepts[or respects] all insertions and deletions, reject ignores all > insertions and deletions". I understand that it is tricky to discuss a > negation like this in a clear way though. > In fact, I just realised I got them muddled myself (see highlight above) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To post to this group, send email to pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/4eff1e01-41bb-409f-8835-c5d47c8060f1%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_256_211232115.1423831313414 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Friday, February 13, 2015 at 12:36:40 PM UTC, O= liver wrote:
H= ello, the DocX to md reader seems to be working really well. I think that t= he Pandoc documentation however is a little confusing regarding the track-c= hanges options. It states:

--track-chan= ges=3Daccept|reject|all<= /dt>
... accept&= nbsp;(the default), inserts all insertions, and ignores all deletions. = ;reject inserts all deletions and ignores insertions. all puts in both insertions and deletions, wrapped in spans wit= h = insertion and deletion classes, respectively.&nb= sp;
 
maybe this is semantic quibbling= , but to me "ignores all deletions" makes it sound as if the deletion is no= t being respected (ie the deleted text will be present), while "inserts all= deletions" makes it so= und as if the deleted text is being put back in EDIT, actually this is what= reject does. It is just the definition of "accept" that I find counter-int= uitive. I think it would be clearer if it followed Word's nomenclatu= re (even at the risk of being a circular definition), and said something li= ke "accept accepts[or respects] all insertions and deletions, reject ignore= s all insertions and deletions". I understand that it is tricky to discuss = a negation like this in a clear way though.
In fact, I just realised I got them muddled myself (see highli= ght above)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to pand= oc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
To post to this group, send email to pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/= msgid/pandoc-discuss/4eff1e01-41bb-409f-8835-c5d47c8060f1%40googlegroups.co= m.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_256_211232115.1423831313414-- ------=_Part_255_1966441635.1423831313414--