I have the 2.13 version installed. Well, no worries I hope it doesn't happen. 

If I need to create another folder for a new .md document and see the issue again I guess I'll reply inside this discussion. 

Thanks for all the help!

El viernes, 28 de mayo de 2021 a las 11:27:45 UTC-5, John MacFarlane escribió:

You're not expected to create them. Pandoc works fine without
them. But if you did have them, it could be implicitly using
a reference-doc defined there, so I wanted to rule that out.

Well, I can't reproduce your issue or think of anything that
could be causing it.

Please use pandoc --version and be sure you're running the
latest version (2.13).

Julio Vera <avenz...@gmail.com> writes:

> I never created this folder ~/.pandoc or this one ~/.local/share/pandoc. I
> made a quick google search and found that I was expected to create those
> directories, I never found the guidelines in the documentation tho. So
> answering your question, I don't have a reference.docx because I haven't
> created those directories.
>
> thank you
>
> El jueves, 27 de mayo de 2021 a las 16:16:27 UTC-5, John MacFarlane
> escribió:
>
>>
>> Do you have a folder ~/.pandoc or ~/.local/share/pandoc that
>> contains reference.docx?
>>
>> Julio Vera <avenz...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:
>>
>> > Hi! I don't understand what about the "reference.docx", but in my folder
>> > where I have the .md file I only have another .pdf file.
>> >
>> > The command I use is: pandoc pxdxcomp.md -o pxdxcomp.docx
>> > El jueves, 27 de mayo de 2021 a las 14:04:36 UTC-5, John MacFarlane
>> > escribió:
>> >
>> >> Also, please let us know the full command you are using to
>> >> convert (including any options).
>> >>
>> >> John MacFarlane <j...-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Make sure you don't have a reference.docx in your user data
>> >> > directory.
>> >> >
>> >> > Julio Vera <avenz...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:
>> >> >
>> >> >> The latest one available in pandoc.org, I ran the script to
>> uninstall
>> >> it
>> >> >> and then downloaded it again for macOS.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I tested again with this file (prueba.md) that I created just to see
>> if
>> >> it
>> >> >> woks with new files but I got the same result.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> [image: Captura de Pantalla 2021-05-27 a la(s) 12.54.14.png]
>> >> >> However, when I convert the dxprevcovid19.md to .docx the table
>> there
>> >> >> renders fine.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> El jueves, 27 de mayo de 2021 a las 12:49:09 UTC-5, John MacFarlane
>> >> >> escribió:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> That's very strange -- it looks like it is using extremely narrow
>> >> >>> columns. But I can't reproduce this with latest pandoc. It
>> >> >>> looks fine. What version are you using?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Julio Vera <avenz...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> > [image: Captura de Pantalla 2021-05-27 a la(s) 12.27.20.png]
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Corrected it, but the tables are still not rendering. That's how
>> I
>> >> see
>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>> > tables inside the docx just for that file (pxdxcomp.md), when I
>> >> convert
>> >> >>> it
>> >> >>> > to pdf they render fine.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > El jueves, 27 de mayo de 2021 a las 12:17:28 UTC-5, John
>> MacFarlane
>> >> >>> > escribió:
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> Looks like you've got four ---- instead of three --- under the
>> >> >>> >> YAML metadata block.
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> Julio Vera <avenz...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> > Hi!
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > I attached 2 files. The one that I can't convert correctly is
>> >> >>> >> pxdxcomp.md,
>> >> >>> >> > the other one (dxprevcovid) I tried to convert it and had no
>> >> issue.
>> >> >>> The
>> >> >>> >> > language of my work is in Spanish, I hope it isn't an issue
>> here.
>> >> I
>> >> >>> >> tried
>> >> >>> >> > copying everything and pasting it inside a new file but still
>> >> have
>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>> >> same
>> >> >>> >> > problem, also I uninstalled and installed pandoc.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > El jueves, 27 de mayo de 2021 a las 12:00:09 UTC-5, John
>> >> MacFarlane
>> >> >>> >> > escribió:
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> Not much we can do to help without seeing the input markdown
>> >> file...
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> Julio Vera <avenz...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> > I usually just ran the following command:
>> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >> > pandoc nameofile.md --citeproc -o nameofile.docx
>> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >> > But today I was working with a particular .md file and
>> after I
>> >> >>> >> finished
>> >> >>> >> >> > with it I tried to convert it, but the title, date and
>> author
>> >> >>> >> parameters
>> >> >>> >> >> > that go inside the YAML block aren't converted, they
>> display
>> >> like
>> >> >>> >> this:
>> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >> > title: title of the document
>> >> >>> >> >> > author: myname
>> >> >>> >> >> > date: today
>> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >> > But just in that format, not like it used to do. And also
>> the
>> >> >>> tables
>> >> >>> >> >> aren't
>> >> >>> >> >> > formatted, they and up in the docs like this:
>> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >> > p t
>> >> >>> >> >> > r 2
>> >> >>> >> >> > 1 2
>> >> >>> >> >> > 2 2
>> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >> > Just to say an example. I don't know hat happened.
>> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >> > --
>> >> >>> >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>> >> Google
>> >> >>> >> >> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
>> >> >>> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
>> from
>> >> it,
>> >> >>> >> send
>> >> >>> >> >> an email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
>> >> >>> >> >> > To view this discussion on the web visit
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/1abeeca5-7362-441d-907a-08df53958b28n%40googlegroups.com
>> >> >>> >> >> .
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > --
>> >> >>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>> >> Google
>> >> >>> >> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
>> >> >>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>> it,
>> >> >>> send
>> >> >>> >> an email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
>> >> >>> >> > To view this discussion on the web visit
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/eaeda4d3-c7f4-430f-b569-e2fee781b831n%40googlegroups.com
>> >> >>> >> .
>> >> >>> >> > ---
>> >> >>> >> > title: Diagnóstico situacional sobre la prevalencia de
>> SARS-COV-2
>> >> en
>> >> >>> >> perros, gatos y hurones de propietarios previamente
>> diagnósticados
>> >> con
>> >> >>> el
>> >> >>> >> virus.
>> >> >>> >> > author: Julio Vera de León
>> >> >>> >> > date: 25/Mayo/2021
>> >> >>> >> > bibliography: proyecto.bib
>> >> >>> >> > csl: vca.csl
>> >> >>> >> > ---
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > # Título
>> >> >>> >> > **H. CONSEJO TÉCNICO DE LA FACULTAD**
>> >> >>> >> > **DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA Y ZOOTECNIA**
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > **Presente**
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Él que suscribe, **Julio Vera de León**, alumnos de la
>> Maestría
>> >> en
>> >> >>> >> Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia en el área de Salud Pública y
>> >> Medicina
>> >> >>> >> Preventiva, con número de cuenta 52101425-4. Pone a su
>> >> consideración el
>> >> >>> >> siguiente tema para diagnóstico de situación:
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > **Diagnóstico situacional sobre la prevalencia de SARS-COV-2
>> en
>> >> >>> perros,
>> >> >>> >> gatos y hurones de propietarios previamente diagnósticados con
>> el
>> >> >>> virus.**
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Que será realizado en el **Departamento de Medicina Preventiva
>> y
>> >> >>> Salud
>> >> >>> >> Pública de la Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia de la
>> >> UNAM**
>> >> >>> y
>> >> >>> >> que pertenece al campo de profundización profesional: **Medicina
>> >> >>> Preventiva
>> >> >>> >> y Salud Pública**. Bajo la asesoría del comité tutor conformado
>> por
>> >> el
>> >> >>> >> **Dr. MSP Juan Ramón Ayala Torres**, la **MCV. Patricia Mora
>> >> Medina** y
>> >> >>> el
>> >> >>> >> **MCV. Jorge Francisco Monroy López**
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > # Introducción
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > El sustento de este diagnóstico de situación viene de que a la
>> >> fecha
>> >> >>> es
>> >> >>> >> desconocido por el autor algún material bibliográfico o de
>> consulta
>> >> en
>> >> >>> el
>> >> >>> >> que se tengan datos referentes al número de animales que han
>> sido
>> >> >>> >> infectados por el síndrome respiratorio agudo severo coronavirus
>> 2
>> >> >>> >> (SARS-COV-2). Esto a pesar de que la infección en los animales
>> por
>> >> >>> >> SARS-COV-2 cumple los criterios de la OIE como enfermedad
>> >> emergente.[^1]
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Es relevante tener datos que nos permitan conocer la
>> prevalencia
>> >> del
>> >> >>> >> agente en los animales de compañía con los que mantenemos una
>> >> relación
>> >> >>> más
>> >> >>> >> cercana.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > [^1]: Enfermedad emergente por la OIE: La aparición de una
>> >> >>> enfermedad,
>> >> >>> >> infección o infestación nueva y que impacta en la sanidad animal
>> o
>> >> la
>> >> >>> salud
>> >> >>> >> humana.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > A la fecha existen al menos 4 distintas instituciones en
>> América
>> >> que
>> >> >>> >> están realizando estudios de muestreo para conocer la cantidad
>> de
>> >> >>> animales
>> >> >>> >> de compañia infectados por contacto con sus propietarios, las
>> >> cuales
>> >> >>> son:
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > 1. [Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph](
>> >> >>> >> https://ovc.uoguelph.ca)
>> >> >>> >> > 2. [Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts
>> University](
>> >> >>> >> https://sites.tufts.edu/covers/)
>> >> >>> >> > 3. [Texas A&M University, College of Veterinary Medicine &
>> >> Biomedical
>> >> >>> >> Sciences](
>> https://vetmed.tamu.edu/hamer-lab/covid-19-pets-research/
>> >> )
>> >> >>> >> > 4. [University of Washington Center for One Health Research](
>> >> >>> >> https://deohs.washington.edu/cohr/covid-19-and-pets-study-caps)
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > La evidencia apunta a que la epidemia provocada por SARS-COV-2
>> se
>> >> >>> >> mantiene principalmente por la transmisión de humanos hacia
>> otros
>> >> >>> humanos,
>> >> >>> >> por lo que en este estudio el enfoque será conocer la cantidad
>> de
>> >> >>> animales
>> >> >>> >> que han sido infectados por sus propietarios, factores que
>> >> >>> contribuyeron a
>> >> >>> >> la infección, y conocer los tipos de casa en los que hubo más
>> >> riesgo de
>> >> >>> >> infección a las mascotas. Aunado a lo anterior, la OIE no
>> descarta
>> >> a
>> >> >>> los
>> >> >>> >> animales salvajes y domésticos como reservorios futuros de la
>> >> >>> enfermedad y
>> >> >>> >> que puedan representar un problema para la salud pública, por lo
>> >> que
>> >> >>> >> sugiere el monitoreo cercano de las especies con las que más
>> >> >>> convivimos. De
>> >> >>> >> igual forma, la introducción constante del virus a nuevas
>> >> poblaciones
>> >> >>> >> animales puede llevar a mutaciones que puedan afectar la sanidad
>> >> animal
>> >> >>> o
>> >> >>> >> salud humana.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > A la fecha la OIE cuenta con información referente a las
>> especies
>> >> de
>> >> >>> >> interés en este diagnóstico en cuánto a la susceptibilidad que
>> >> tienen
>> >> >>> al
>> >> >>> >> virus, se pone en la siguiente tabla:[@OIE2021]
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > | Especie | Tipo de infección | Susceptibilidad a la infección
>> |
>> >> >>> Signos
>> >> >>> >> clínicos | Transmisión |
>> >> >>> >> > | ------------------ | ---------------------- |
>> >> >>> >> ------------------------------ | -------------------------- |
>> >> >>> >> ----------------- |
>> >> >>> >> > | Hurones | Natural y experimental | Alta | Sí (sólo en
>> algunos
>> >> >>> casos) |
>> >> >>> >> Sí, entre hurones |
>> >> >>> >> > | Gatos (domésticos) | Natural y experimental | Alta | Sí
>> (sólo
>> >> en
>> >> >>> >> algunos casos) | Sí, entre gatos |
>> >> >>> >> > | Perros | Natural y experimental | Baja | Sí (sólo en algunos
>> >> casos)
>> >> >>> |
>> >> >>> >> No |
>> >> >>> >> > Table: SARS-COV-2 en Hurones, perros y gatos (adaptado de la
>> OIE)
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > A pesar de que la información actual ha mencionado que la
>> >> epidemia se
>> >> >>> >> mantiene por medio de la transmisión humano-humano, no se puede
>> >> >>> descartar
>> >> >>> >> como un componente de esta cadena de transmisión a los animales
>> de
>> >> >>> >> compañia, aunque su papel de momento sea mucho menos relevante.
>> De
>> >> ahí
>> >> >>> que
>> >> >>> >> una de las indicaciones que contempla la CDC sea la de mantener
>> a
>> >> los
>> >> >>> >> animales separados junto con su propietario y reconoce el riesgo
>> de
>> >> >>> >> transmisión desde la mascota es bajo. [@CDC2021]
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > # Justificación
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > La detección del material genético del virus de SARS-COV-2 en
>> >> perros
>> >> >>> y
>> >> >>> >> gatos se ha demostrado en animales con y sin signología, así
>> como
>> >> >>> también
>> >> >>> >> en el suero de mascotas que se han muestreado en zonas
>> afectadas,
>> >> por
>> >> >>> lo
>> >> >>> >> que la infección en estas especies está comprobada, y más
>> >> importante se
>> >> >>> ha
>> >> >>> >> comprobado que llegan a diseminar material viral con una
>> cantidad
>> >> >>> necesaria
>> >> >>> >> que ha demostrado ser capaz de infectar a otros animales con los
>> >> que
>> >> >>> >> conviven. @Patterson2020
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > En contraste con lo mencionado anteriormente, las especies de
>> >> >>> producción
>> >> >>> >> como cerdos (*Sus scropha*) y aves (gallinas, patos y pavos) han
>> >> >>> demostrado
>> >> >>> >> de nula a extremadamente baja susceptiblidad de infección de
>> manera
>> >> >>> >> experimental, además de que no se ha comprobado sean capaces de
>> >> >>> transmitir
>> >> >>> >> la enfermedad. @Shi2020 De manera similar los bovinos (*Bos
>> >> taurus*)
>> >> >>> que se
>> >> >>> >> han inoculado experimentalmente con el agente viral han
>> demostrado
>> >> una
>> >> >>> >> susceptibilidad baja al agente y nula capacidad de transmisión
>> del
>> >> >>> mismo.
>> >> >>> >> @Ulrich2020
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Debido a que las especies usadas comúnmente en la ganadería no
>> >> han
>> >> >>> >> demostrado ser suceptibles al virus, se decide enfocar el
>> >> diagnístico
>> >> >>> de
>> >> >>> >> situación en perros, gatos y hurones. De estos tres es de
>> >> particular
>> >> >>> >> relevancia mencionar a los hurones domésticos (*Mustela outorius
>> >> >>> furo*), ya
>> >> >>> >> que pertenecen a la familia *Mustelidae* y guardan una relación
>> >> >>> taxonómica
>> >> >>> >> con los mustélidos usados en granjas como lo es el visón
>> americano
>> >> >>> >> (*Neovison vison*) y visón europeo (*Mustela lutreola*), estos
>> >> últimos
>> >> >>> >> responsables del brote de SARS-COV-2 que llevó a la eutanasia de
>> 17
>> >> >>> >> millones de visones.[^2]
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Aunque los hurones domésticos frecuentemente se encuentran
>> >> separados
>> >> >>> de
>> >> >>> >> otros y no son capaces de mantener la propagación del virus de
>> >> manera
>> >> >>> >> estable @Gortazar2021, el gobierno del Reino Unido ha emitido
>> una
>> >> guía
>> >> >>> >> especial para los dueños de estos animales debido al riesgo que
>> >> pueden
>> >> >>> >> representar [^3].
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > [^2]: [¿Por qué Dinamarca sacrificó 17 millones de visones?](
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/animal-news/here-s-why-denmark-culled-17-million-minks-now-plans-n1249610
>> >> >>> >> )
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > [^3]: [Medidas preventivas en lo que respecta al SARS-COV-2 y
>> los
>> >> >>> >> hurones en el Reino Unido](
>> >> >>> >>
>> http://apha.defra.gov.uk/documents/guidance-sars-cov-2-ferrets.pdf)
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Es así que en consideración al Código Sanitario para los
>> Animales
>> >> >>> >> Terrestres que contempla al SARS-COV-2 como una enfermedad
>> >> emergente y
>> >> >>> la
>> >> >>> >> falta de datos al respecto de la enfermedad en los animales
>> >> domésticos,
>> >> >>> es
>> >> >>> >> necesario realizar un diagnóstico de situación en nuestra
>> >> población.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > # Referencias
>> >> >>> >> > ---
>> >> >>> >> > title: Ejercicio de pruebas diagnósticas complementarias
>> >> >>> >> > author: Julio Vera de León
>> >> >>> >> > date: 26/Mayo/2021
>> >> >>> >> > ----
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > # Primer prueba
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > La primer prueba tamiz que se usa para brucelosis es la de
>> anillo
>> >> en
>> >> >>> >> leche.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Se hizo un diagnóstico con la prueba tamiz de anillo en leche
>> >> para
>> >> >>> >> detectar a los hatos positivos a la enfermedad, estos hatos
>> cuentan
>> >> con
>> >> >>> >> 10.000 animales, los cuales fueron evaluados individualmente
>> para
>> >> >>> encontrar
>> >> >>> >> los positivos; a través de la prueba tamiz de rosa de bengala la
>> >> cual
>> >> >>> tiene
>> >> >>> >> una sensibilidad del 95.2% y una especificidad del 98.5%.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > | Prueba | Positivos | Negativos | Total |
>> >> >>> >> > | --------- | --------- | --------- | ----- |
>> >> >>> >> > | Positivos | 286 | 145 | 431 |
>> >> >>> >> > | Negativos | 14 | 9555 | 9569 |
>> >> >>> >> > | Total | 300 | 9700 | 10000 |
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > 1. Sanos: 9555
>> >> >>> >> > 2. Enfermos postprueba: 286
>> >> >>> >> > 3. Falsos positivos: 145
>> >> >>> >> > 4. Falsos negativos: 14
>> >> >>> >> > 5. Valor predictivo positivo: 66%
>> >> >>> >> > 6. Valor predictivo negativo: 99%
>> >> >>> >> > 7. Positivos a la prueba: 431 animales positivos, incluyendo
>> >> falsos
>> >> >>> >> positivos.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Son muchos animales (431) que se van a eliminar incluyendo los
>> >> 145
>> >> >>> >> falsos positivos, sacrificando 145 animales que no deberían
>> >> >>> sacrificarse,
>> >> >>> >> por lo que es necesario después de la prueba tamiz realizar una
>> >> prueba
>> >> >>> >> mucho más especifica, por lo que se sugierte una prueba con mas
>> >> >>> >> especificidad para bajar la cantidad de falsos positivos.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > # Segunda prueba
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > La siguiente prueba se hace en paralelo, la norma dice que la
>> >> segunda
>> >> >>> >> prueba es la *prueba de ribanol*. Esta tiene una sensibilidad
>> del
>> >> 96.4%
>> >> >>> y
>> >> >>> >> especificidad de 98.7%
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Cuadro de 2x2:
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > | Prueba | Positivos | Negativos | Total |
>> >> >>> >> > | --------- | --------- | --------- | ----- |
>> >> >>> >> > | Positivos | 276 | 2 | 278 |
>> >> >>> >> > | Negativos | 10 | 143 | 153 |
>> >> >>> >> > | Total | 286 | 145 | 431 |
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > 1. En que animales se aplicaría? Sobre el total de positivos,
>> que
>> >> >>> sería
>> >> >>> >> 431
>> >> >>> >> > 2. Verdaderos positivos: 276
>> >> >>> >> > 3. Verdaderamente sanos: 143
>> >> >>> >> > 4. Falsos positivos: 2
>> >> >>> >> > 5. Falsos negativos: 10
>> >> >>> >> > 6. Valor predicitvo positivo: 99%
>> >> >>> >> > 7. Valor predictivo negativo: 93%
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > # Tercer prueba
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Al realizar un tercer diagnóstico con la prueba de fijación
>> del
>> >> >>> >> complemento (confirmatoria) con una sensibilidad del 97.5% y
>> >> >>> especificidad
>> >> >>> >> del 99%
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Cuadro 2 x2:
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > | Prueba | Positivos | Negativos | Total |
>> >> >>> >> > | --------- | --------- | --------- | ----- |
>> >> >>> >> > | Positivos | 269 | 0 | 269 |
>> >> >>> >> > | Negativos | 7 | 2 | 9 |
>> >> >>> >> > | Total | 276 | 2 | 278 |
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > 1. Animales falsos positivos que seran eliminados: 0
>> >> >>> >> > 2. Animales falsos negativos que quedarán en el hato: 7
>> >> >>> >> > 3. Valor predictivo positivo: 100%. Quiere decir que de los
>> >> animales
>> >> >>> a
>> >> >>> >> los que se les hace la prueba y están enfermos, el 100% saldrán
>> con
>> >> un
>> >> >>> >> respultado positivo.
>> >> >>> >> > 4. Valor predictivo negativo: 22%. Quiere decir de los
>> animales a
>> >> los
>> >> >>> >> que se les hace la prueba y están sanos, solamente el 22% tiene
>> >> >>> >> probabilidad de estar realmente sano si salió negativo.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > # Después de las pruebas
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Al realizar un diagnóstico a los 6 meses de iniciado el
>> programa:
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > 1. ¿Cuál es la prevalencia real final de la enfermedad en la
>> >> cuenca
>> >> >>> >> lechera? 2.8% (278/10000)
>> >> >>> >> > 2. La prevalencia real en el 3er cuadro: 99.3%
>> >> >>> >> > 3. ¿Cuál es la prevalencia aparente en el 3er cuadro? 2.7% ()
>> >> >>> >> > 4. Repercusiones de dejar a los animales falsos negativos en
>> el
>> >> hato
>> >> >>> es
>> >> >>> >> que se quedan 7 animales con brucella, que pueden seguir
>> >> contagiando y
>> >> >>> >> prevalece la enfermedad.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > El costo de la prueba da anillo en leche es absorbido por el
>> >> gobierno
>> >> >>> >> como una ayuda a los productoras y un incentivo para erradicar
>> esta
>> >> >>> >> zoonosis de tos animales. Sin embargo, el costo de las demás
>> >> pruebas es
>> >> >>> >> erogado por los productores:
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > 1. Costo de diagnosticar a los 10,000 animales con rosa de
>> >> bengala
>> >> >>> >> (anillo en leche), si esta prueba cuesta $0.15 por 100 animales:
>> 15
>> >> >>> pesos
>> >> >>> >> > 2. Costo de diagnosticar $1 por 100: serían $4.3
>> >> >>> >> > 3. Costo de diagnosticar fijación por complemento $500 por 100
>> >> >>> animales:
>> >> >>> >> $1390
>> >> >>> >> > 4. Costo de eliminar a los animales positivos y falsos
>> positivos
>> >> >>> >> (separadamente), si una vaquilla de reemplazo cuesta $1,000
>> >> dolares.
>> >> >>> Costo
>> >> >>> >> de positivos: $278,000 dolares.
>> >> >>> >> > 5. Costo total de las 3 pruebas y de los animales a
>> sacrificar:
>> >> De
>> >> >>> las 3
>> >> >>> >> pruebas son $1409.3 pesos.
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > --
>> >> >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>> Google
>> >> >>> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
>> >> >>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> >> send
>> >> >>> an email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
>> >> >>> > To view this discussion on the web visit
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/edd6a94c-a735-494d-88c5-bacabb6842b0n%40googlegroups.com
>> >> >>> .
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
>> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> send
>> >> an email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
>> >> >> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> >>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/932560f4-7866-4fd4-90e7-4797e23fab20n%40googlegroups.com
>> >> .
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Table tests to see if it works
>> >> >>
>> >> >> | Perros | Talla | Peso | Nombre |
>> >> >> | ------ | ----- | ---- | ------ |
>> >> >> | 23 | 5 | 6 | Chicu |
>> >> >> | 24 | 2 | 4 | Fala |
>> >> >> | 45 | 8 | 10 | Frty |
>> >> >> Table: Perros 1
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Another table
>> >> >>
>> >> >> | Perros | Talla | Peso | Nombre |
>> >> >> | ------ | ----- | ---- | ------ |
>> >> >> | 23 | 5 | 6 | Chicu |
>> >> >> | 24 | 2 | 4 | Fala |
>> >> >> | 45 | 8 | 10 | Frty |
>> >> >> Table: Perros 2
>> >> >>
>> >> >> And another table
>> >> >>
>> >> >> | Perros | Talla | Peso | Nombre |
>> >> >> | ------ | ----- | ---- | ------ |
>> >> >> | 23 | 5 | 6 | Chicu |
>> >> >> | 24 | 2 | 4 | Fala |
>> >> >> | 45 | 8 | 10 | Frty |
>> >> >> Table: Perros 3
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> an email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/ba007430-af22-455f-a4a8-96011afe5dc3n%40googlegroups.com
>> .
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discus...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/74450a6b-43ad-4780-90d6-80f51c203f1fn%40googlegroups.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/50f795ed-15e0-47e9-a0ab-2430c60e6893n%40googlegroups.com.