Great! Can we try it? Or it's not yet in public version?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="auto" class="gmail_attr">On Sunday, September 13, 2020 at 1:06:30 AM UTC+2 John MacFarlane wrote:<br/></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0 0 0 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>I tried out the new citeproc-enabled pandoc (from citeproc
<br>branch), comparing it against pandoc 2.10.1 + pandoc-citeproc.
<br>
<br>My test project was a document with about 30,000 words,
<br>using a 132K bibtex bibliography.
<br>
<br>In addition to pandoc-citeproc, I used a lua filter to
<br>count words.
<br>
<br>For pandoc 2.10.1 + pandoc-citeproc, the build (to HTML)
<br>took 2.22s.
<br>
<br>With the new citeproc-enabled pandoc, it took 1.03s.
<br>By comparison, without --citeproc (skipping citation processing)
<br>it took 0.84s.  So, the overhead for citation processing is now
<br>pretty minimal, and people should see a big speedup.
<br>
<br>
<br></blockquote></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &quot;pandoc-discuss&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href="mailto:pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org">pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org</a>.<br />
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/52149bdb-e476-4013-8d5b-72b0b0544877n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer">https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/52149bdb-e476-4013-8d5b-72b0b0544877n%40googlegroups.com</a>.<br />