From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.text.pandoc/26126 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Newsgroups: gmane.text.pandoc Subject: Re: new citeproc performance notes Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 16:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <52149bdb-e476-4013-8d5b-72b0b0544877n@googlegroups.com> References: Reply-To: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_520_1860246064.1599953354334" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35366"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: pandoc-discuss Original-X-From: pandoc-discuss+bncBCMOFOPUYUBBBS5T6X5AKGQEU6VYJUA-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Sun Sep 13 01:29:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: gtp-pandoc-discuss@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from mail-oo1-f58.google.com ([209.85.161.58]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHExK-00095V-ER for gtp-pandoc-discuss@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 01:29:18 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-oo1-f58.google.com with SMTP id t23sf6460083ooc.13 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 16:29:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=ssYd4iOrFQPvOsPo3C0IPSB9DRqTdchDiEX+jS38jFY=; b=AmAXQnYdrVy/bgHSqG9uWTJhk7L09a+woDRymAUfFkj4lpttnX5Qfrt9UyG3u/wuWW xJojcni4nMaDKKrJZdO99A+FlwfJjc34HdJTJfTUW7K1ujXqo7FEOVTaJq8oxPG+ivik xexN0/Cl0mqwe5NmegnFVRf67iWizxpYzKuXmGFKlHYizaBCDq2tpXOVdFrRiCP39qbh WmtrNJOKDIr7mT5tYrDpajAWTBKByQ9dawUwyhzsh8Clve8ckMzUc/UBxs6OTYFneJsi sErQZp8ijzHb/+29XurAP4urjV7HLdwk5DgWqtYOOi9k9jkzG28M3jvebHTP3igKjtDR DH6g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=ssYd4iOrFQPvOsPo3C0IPSB9DRqTdchDiEX+jS38jFY=; b=Ro44DP4CpQLp324cl6OkX+VjXmvobHiPgNcnC1bxiqfzwRJhjNQpOG6seiT+RveSqL VYMCMNRjTbZ1GC85E26T1COgFT+aSs6GoYvVG+1/6dXCGE1cax+h+HjxXjiZPgJP5y8B 551iL0E2pRhrfuTGCetZJ52QNAFvG4+AUIgkRFUEt8TLKYVuc4M69wM2yWOKrdEWrtXI 9FkUe/G6I3+1FtZ4erTFZkbhbbxWOuSUs2/AIOTwJw24VTdqP2ytFwYDoYPx1VjzN0El okhNxkVR/zfBMenCdcSfRMasVo5rjQa50TwZqstTZhw7urYxPLOi4s5rei8h/XT51QXj 11kg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=ssYd4iOrFQPvOsPo3C0IPSB9DRqTdchDiEX+jS38jFY=; b=WoRSnahLEcFh3GLa6L/s2A0M6nF9SKSnNojEnA9cq6a28ey1nfvmwkgp9FA3z82rdY TLoEfyHNsFLr7HB4tYKlhXvsD0MscOYT4ES0gL+GPCUqljUXsGbrdWMv495AcLDHWMiY 4lSwA2bp7L6fPK20PGbDBHD8pDuYnNNdK6mp7jopJQwtYqtJObceRZbKgMeEDnrLLldc qwjGZosOkEv+W4Rd7VB1oaew+WmZrd4zHJsS4Hr03bciOqMypSU2kehgdP35VlqCT35y 8QsfSRp3g+WOWbfpjGgHKC4lYS6/+XKtboM8Yu44k2EDj2bg/IXZIzOE55exHj0ua8A7 yKoQ== Original-Sender: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530doybowa4VaY0cvm/NfKKcOMh4YmuQ5KPlHZFs2uncHNqUP5ZH sU4ZnYu3hpgS49999AW6+74= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzuz7qkNKB8v+62Xwd69/KPm6by0m/ZrjmqE0fdacs8Bpk1ss/6TfWTpXBlRn68lJIw3OBCuA== X-Received: by 2002:aca:4e03:: with SMTP id c3mr4663722oib.169.1599953357474; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 16:29:17 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Original-Received: by 2002:a9d:2231:: with SMTP id o46ls1232150ota.11.gmail; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 16:29:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3407:: with SMTP id v7mr5126601otb.117.1599953355230; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 16:29:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: omvvardar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Precedence: list Mailing-list: list pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org; contact pandoc-discuss+owners-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1007024079513 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.text.pandoc:26126 Archived-At: ------=_Part_520_1860246064.1599953354334 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_521_1034618619.1599953354334" ------=_Part_521_1034618619.1599953354334 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Great! Can we try it? Or it's not yet in public version? On Sunday, September 13, 2020 at 1:06:30 AM UTC+2 John MacFarlane wrote: > > I tried out the new citeproc-enabled pandoc (from citeproc > branch), comparing it against pandoc 2.10.1 + pandoc-citeproc. > > My test project was a document with about 30,000 words, > using a 132K bibtex bibliography. > > In addition to pandoc-citeproc, I used a lua filter to > count words. > > For pandoc 2.10.1 + pandoc-citeproc, the build (to HTML) > took 2.22s. > > With the new citeproc-enabled pandoc, it took 1.03s. > By comparison, without --citeproc (skipping citation processing) > it took 0.84s. So, the overhead for citation processing is now > pretty minimal, and people should see a big speedup. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/52149bdb-e476-4013-8d5b-72b0b0544877n%40googlegroups.com. ------=_Part_521_1034618619.1599953354334 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Great! Can we try it? Or it's not yet in public version?

On Sunday, Septembe= r 13, 2020 at 1:06:30 AM UTC+2 John MacFarlane wrote:

I tried out the new citeproc-enabled pandoc (from citeproc
branch), comparing it against pandoc 2.10.1 + pandoc-citeproc.

My test project was a document with about 30,000 words,
using a 132K bibtex bibliography.

In addition to pandoc-citeproc, I used a lua filter to
count words.

For pandoc 2.10.1 + pandoc-citeproc, the build (to HTML)
took 2.22s.

With the new citeproc-enabled pandoc, it took 1.03s.
By comparison, without --citeproc (skipping citation processing)
it took 0.84s. So, the overhead for citation processing is now
pretty minimal, and people should see a big speedup.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to pand= oc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d= /msgid/pandoc-discuss/52149bdb-e476-4013-8d5b-72b0b0544877n%40googlegroups.= com.
------=_Part_521_1034618619.1599953354334-- ------=_Part_520_1860246064.1599953354334--