Re: CSL YAML to "rich" bibtex?

[John MacFarlane <fiddlosopher-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

We could consider it. Put up an issue.

> On Sep 8, 2022, at 11:05 AM, Joseph Reagle <joseph.2011-T1oY19WcHSwdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> I know `url` wasn't include in Patashnik [1], but it's been common since at least 2007/2008 [2] [3].
> 
> Would there be an objection to including it in the bibtex output? (I'm not sure what other fields are now common in the wild, but a strength of bibtex is that it was easy to include fields that could be ignored.)
> 
> [1]: https://ctan.math.illinois.edu/biblio/bibtex/base/btxdoc.pdf
> [2]: https://tug.org/pracjourn/2006-4/fenn/fenn.pdf
> [3]: https://mirrors.rit.edu/CTAN/biblio/bibtex/contrib/doc/btxFAQ.pdf
> 
> On 22-08-23 12:17, John MacFarlane wrote:
>> Did you try `-t biblatex`?
>>> On Aug 23, 2022, at 8:19 AM, Joseph Reagle <joseph.2011-T1oY19WcHSwdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I'm attempting to use the ACM extension for Quarto, and it requires a bibtex file.
>>> 
>>> I have YAML that works with pandoc, but when I convert it to bibtex (below) it drops the `url` field -- since that's not old-school bibtex?
>>> 
>>> Is there any way to get a "rich" bibtex file from CSL JSON/YAML?
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/569bd382-789f-b4dd-53a7-01974c970a39%40reagle.org.