From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.text.pandoc/12129 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Denis Navas Newsgroups: gmane.text.pandoc Subject: Re: Reference.docx and default Word styles Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:57:56 -0600 Message-ID: <54ECE5D4.7060302@gmail.com> References: <10d80cbd-5bdb-4937-811c-24af52aaadf3@googlegroups.com> <62149c61-fcbb-465d-b1ca-6d0b881c9072@googlegroups.com> <20150224181115.GA439@protagoras.berkeley.edu> <30cd30a9-014a-426a-b0f8-5be416ba4c58@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1424824997 17944 80.91.229.3 (25 Feb 2015 00:43:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:43:17 +0000 (UTC) To: public-pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw-wOFGN7rlS/M9smdsby/KFg@public.gmane.org Original-X-From: pandoc-discuss+bncBDK3NY63YMKBBGVVWSTQKGQEXEDJ3XY-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Wed Feb 25 01:43:09 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gtp-pandoc-discuss@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f184.google.com ([209.85.217.184]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YQQ4C-00057c-9q for gtp-pandoc-discuss@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 01:43:08 +0100 Original-Received: by lbjf15 with SMTP id f15sf197523lbj.1 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:43:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=2/ANXtZ1omqKDXFsucExA4MDiLqim+HGHEuKseBzUR0=; b=eYN0zE9ED9sqhOlVZIWMxsvdtSJouifxux7Jv8BXW5B4kANfok7UivzjTMFUu0ffw/ AesXHl/qRocpfffn8JCRUOoJycfQkCvx/Fbfwj7iTTcau3tjwYVFTjM+tEEzD3R5sYkf LJTg6Qu+P4h00b7CnxIY2AseZBUlnf+Mw5XnHHb3Qi1QUFZd7RdDN7r+HXzoBp6QAQFV PhyewWgKCYCM2sZkcPl53QoRTUkYpG9pM/iFOsDtSLzMzUoCBaO20ge+iT27okjRZ1tz fUpTtBaNKFwnxEzMk9tvqE0OpeNEcik4v1LixsY5SjJSPBc2FFMDB2X9G4USSUA+Dwmf FC1g== X-Received: by 10.180.76.132 with SMTP id k4mr10417wiw.10.1424824987995; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:43:07 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Original-Received: by 10.180.99.71 with SMTP id eo7ls887907wib.21.canary; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:43:06 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.39.164 with SMTP id q4mr107999wik.5.1424824986333; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:43:06 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org. [80.91.229.3]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id xl7si4136754lbb.1.2015.02.24.16.43.06 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:43:06 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of public-wOFGN7rlS/M9smdsby/KFg@public.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) client-ip=80.91.229.3; Original-Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YQQ49-000553-BQ for pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 01:43:05 +0100 Original-Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YQQ48-00054O-JZ for public-pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw-wOFGN7rlS/M9smdsby/KFg@public.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 01:43:04 +0100 Original-Received: from mail-qg0-f45.google.com ([209.85.192.45]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YQMYJ-0006R8-Af for public-pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw-wOFGN7rlS/M9smdsby/KFg@public.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:57:59 +0100 Original-Received: by mail-qg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id h3so32317576qgf.4 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:57:58 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.33.132 with SMTP id j4mr39376949qgj.10.1424811478337; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:57:58 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [190.181.151.86] ([190.181.151.86]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n77sm15896243qha.19.2015.02.24.12.57.56 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:57:57 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: <30cd30a9-014a-426a-b0f8-5be416ba4c58-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org> X-TMDA-Confirmed: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 01:43:04 +0100 X-Original-Sender: denis.navas-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of public-wOFGN7rlS/M9smdsby/KFg@public.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=public-wOFGN7rlS/M9smdsby/KFg@public.gmane.org; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@; dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org; contact pandoc-discuss+owners-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1007024079513 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.text.pandoc:12129 Archived-At: Just a comment, Word fixes by default, spaces before paragraphs. I am not sure what version does that, but I adopted the policy of control the spacing between text and tables or graphs. I prefer to use the space after the paragraph. That way seems more=20 logical to me. But this introduces the following problem: With tables I=20 must give a space before the caption, because I place it above the table=20 and with figures, I must give an space after, because the caption is placed at the figure's bottom. Tables can control its spacing too, and I prefer that does not apply space after the table, to use a paragraph that I name pagraph_note. An apparent solution is to use space before and after the paragraph, but this add space between captions, tables, figures and paragraphs. I know that this is a matter of taste and visual appearance. Just share my opinion to save some effort. El 2015-02-24 a las 12:16, Nikolay Yakimov escribi=C3=B3: > No, not really. I just assumed that giving users an ability to easily > specify different styles for table and image captions is a good thing, > not that I see immediate use for it, but you never know. More > customization possibilities with little to no drawbacks (except for a > little more code) is generally preferable IMO. > > John MacFarlane: > > Personally, I don't see a problem with just using the Caption > style for both kinds of captions (table and image). Is > there a strong reason to use different styles? --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= pandoc-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To post to this group, send email to pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/= pandoc-discuss/54ECE5D4.7060302%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.