Even better - thanks very much!

On Monday, February 11, 2019 at 6:27:25 PM UTC-5, EBkysko wrote:
>
> Your filter looks good, except that any subsection of the "marked" section 
> will remain present... but perhaps that's what you want.
>
> If not, or if anyone else would like to remove all subsections of that 
> section, the following seems to work:
>
> local looking_at_section = false
> local remove = {}
> local lvl = 0
>
> function Block (elem)
>   if looking_at_section then
>     remove[#remove + 1] = elem
>     return {}
>   end
> end
>
> function Header (elem)
>   if elem.identifier == 'remove' then
>     looking_at_section = true
>     lvl = elem.level
>     return {}
>   else
>     looking_at_section = looking_at_section and elem.level > lvl
>     if looking_at_section then
>       remove[#remove + 1] = elem
>       return {}
>     end
>   end
> end
>
> The original filter has the same problem... but an abstract usually 
> doesn't have subsections/sublevels (I think).
>
> Note also that usually an identifier should identify only one element, and 
> pandoc will (rightly) be annoyed when there's more than one header with the 
> same ID.
> A class would be ideal for this situation, and one might then use `if 
> elem.classes:includes('remove',1)` rather than `if elem.identifier == 
> 'remove'`
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To post to this group, send email to pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/5a59f103-d049-453e-b677-d85a2a2d3a76%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.