Am 19.08.2020 um 14:47 schrieb James P. Ascher:

Regarding csl: what feature do you think are missing? If you take a look at the github repos you'll see that a lot has happened recently.

CSL isn't fully compatible with either BibTeX, BibLaTex, or even a mainstream

English-language style like the Chicago Manual of Style:

https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/pull/4578#issuecomment-593047568

So, I join everyone in strongest applause for pandoc going its own way.

Sure it isn't compatible with BibTeX and BibLaTeX. It's a different metadata format, if that is what you're talking about. And styles aren't compatible either, but how should they be?

Regarding CMoS: Chicago is so utterly complex, I doubt there is any solution that is fully compatible with it. Biblatex-chicago is obviously to closest you might get ...

Anyway, you seem to be misunderstanding what this thread is about: John's currently working on a new CSL citeproc. It will replace pandoc-citeproc, but it will nevertheless be based on CSL. So it's not about pandoc going its own way. Or is someone working on a pandoc-specific citation management tool? That would be an interesting project.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/5d4b596a-b3ef-744c-bbae-564e490eb598%40gmail.com.