Re: Is the usage of "longtable" hard-coded into current Pandoc?

[kurt.pfeifle-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1629 bytes --]



Wagner, you was asking *“how about if pandoc provide an option to use 
standard tabular instead of the default longtables?”* (All this is in the 
context of -V classoption:twocolumn, which I did not sufficiently emphasize 
in my comment, sorry.)

This is not implemented yet…

Or is it?!?

Thank you about your hint to your filter. :) Does Google easily find it?


Am Montag, 6. Juli 2015 06:12:14 UTC+2 schrieb Wagner Macedo:

I don't see what you are talking about of not implemented. Markdown tables 
> is very well converted to latex. But unfortunately has some issues that 
> isn't suited to every situations and I agree to maintain longtables as the 
> default option, as the standard latex 'table' environment with 'tabular' 
> has other issues such as not handle footnotes, not adjust columns and not 
> split between pages.
>
> If you can live with all these limitations I used in some of my documents 
> a filter that I wrote in Python to read a table and write a tabular instead 
> of longtables.
>
​

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To post to this group, send email to pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/5e1a514c-9422-4fc6-8257-5040990ceb53%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4772 bytes --]