From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.text.pandoc/24010 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: allefeld Newsgroups: gmane.text.pandoc Subject: Re: RFC: Designing Logo of Pandoc Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2019 17:23:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6e303ba6-19cd-4778-9927-86628af62e41@googlegroups.com> References: <20151101194033.GC18654@Johns-MacBook-Pro.local> <3298337b-6214-4927-bca7-d33ccddca3fa@googlegroups.com> <87shpywqjj.fsf@fastmail.fm> <20161208125813.GA93986@Administrateurs-iMac-3.local> <3e112309-c0ce-4e03-9e69-571a688d9bf7@googlegroups.com> <64f818e0-2e65-4ad5-80c8-35fa8d474037@googlegroups.com> <757085d5-3ad7-4392-b2d2-2e7f793db493@googlegroups.com> <04c5fa73-bd6d-460c-bfde-26b92549c6a5@googlegroups.com> <2f0b25a7-06ec-8823-4f80-e62be3b65fe8@gmail.com> Reply-To: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_3134_1413277351.1575768224906" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="256295"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" To: pandoc-discuss Original-X-From: pandoc-discuss+bncBDL5X6EN3YOBBINBWHXQKGQEODHSIDQ-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Sun Dec 08 02:23:48 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: gtp-pandoc-discuss@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-oi1-f185.google.com ([209.85.167.185]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1idlIa-0014ZY-3k for gtp-pandoc-discuss@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 02:23:48 +0100 Original-Received: by mail-oi1-f185.google.com with SMTP id u16sf2475458oic.5 for ; Sat, 07 Dec 2019 17:23:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=KbO/XzxYQ+cv5O1r/feU7+y/veKFhvP73Bxp+uyfXeg=; b=SIP5sZ4li1dCbP6uP+6QUFXv4mcIex2u0GD+VN+M/pApSAe4RBlQ7fCRXv7BHgppmv e2EwNAWsaq+WWc5geW9WjFJIv8z2hkHOZYFZJgZ0yQ/z8a6NBFeeZBERHnlgMLFK157Q iuaeMJmA62n/gjAQfE1zT8jHkdsJpPMMr8AYW7lMfbRnLhTBPfzNtnG9Pg7gDlrzjpPf Pc3n6rILZivmKyPgimzoJeYqgxmi9AM89i7KiTDMbyZRyhWvBxuF4eVhSXn0GAd4wN7N tjVXo8Kyl4znqW+qLZSW/7RT9s/cqbzRH8jedgD/WpMVQa1Z1zbs2weR61NsACMlAMc0 EQ0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=KbO/XzxYQ+cv5O1r/feU7+y/veKFhvP73Bxp+uyfXeg=; b=ahTrjhnevFuF1ak0WSAVo8p3HAmzye0rYSrManYdY9EcY3qGa18zYWRwBkbcCBdhp6 uOaQt0JmtsaTGQoPLcvqkDodJOETeTf43Ec5iF3wUqgGzWB7iY3I6CcNsT2jlyEPCNo9 9RoHdLS0tJkWmtPvmmYJJegHa+imF8Ib/g1DW3mMRU38/aYPis+A2Q0sKKz57xuuORKG mDFLmRlTLjD7roJHT7vn/GXyGyTN80SynJtXXnRZulAIUNNygEgqOJbHfPU/ZEtlpTBW aTdY9tTV5VMPoaANQ+oTEpfi7liaOYsAbsIK4ljF2kttUGw33E9RhCXu0N4cgq4csok8 VHcg== Original-Sender: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUHnlFyZmrKIvOO+uIkQuC+YPSw3gaAI0RFzo8CcpQ0zOWeVZR+ t/saE8+/s8ZBI4ygNbJEllI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw8jEjxL4HgyYgatS3UVyb8LNw99RqpdztGRVOAH2BdYQAPy5FJPP+UgprMtIWDbnu4Oj+0yw== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1c8:: with SMTP id e66mr6314138ote.354.1575768226845; Sat, 07 Dec 2019 17:23:46 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Original-Received: by 2002:aca:d549:: with SMTP id m70ls1920725oig.10.gmail; Sat, 07 Dec 2019 17:23:45 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:aca:4f48:: with SMTP id d69mr13680806oib.103.1575768225527; Sat, 07 Dec 2019 17:23:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2f0b25a7-06ec-8823-4f80-e62be3b65fe8-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> X-Original-Sender: c_a-1KBjaw7Xf1+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org Precedence: list Mailing-list: list pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org; contact pandoc-discuss+owners-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1007024079513 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.text.pandoc:24010 Archived-At: ------=_Part_3134_1413277351.1575768224906 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3135_1263190119.1575768224906" ------=_Part_3135_1263190119.1575768224906 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Benct, ad 1: I agree that one of the advantages of using a character that is prese= nt in fonts, or at least whose mirror image is present, is that one can mak= e versions of the logo in LaTeX, or HTML or ... But I think it would be nice to still have an official version, using a (re= versed) pilcrow from a specific font. ad 2: I have in fact used Inkscape to produce the logo versions I sent in t= his thread. :) ad 3: I like the idea of having a border in the logo, that would visually r= einforce its squarish nature. Another possibility would be to have the main logo without border, and then= something similar to the Markdown mark "[M=E2=86=93]" to stand for Pandoc-= flavored Markdown. I'm happy to produce new revisions, or alternative versions for different p= urposes. But I'd prefer to first hear from John whether he agrees with the direction= in which this is going, and which variants he favors. Only the reversed pilcrow, or + flipped, or + d, or d from another font? On= the same line or pushed together to form a square? Black or colored? Borde= r or not? --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= pandoc-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/= pandoc-discuss/6e303ba6-19cd-4778-9927-86628af62e41%40googlegroups.com. ------=_Part_3135_1263190119.1575768224906 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 
Benct,

ad 1: I agree that one of the advantages of using a character that is prese=
nt in fonts, or at least whose mirror image is present, is that one can mak=
e versions of the logo in LaTeX, or HTML or ...
But I think it would be nice to still have an official version, using a (re=
versed) pilcrow from a specific font.

ad 2: I have in fact used Inkscape to produce the logo versions I sent in t=
his thread. :)

ad 3: I like the idea of having a border in the logo, that would visually r=
einforce its squarish nature.
Another possibility would be to have the main logo without border, and then=
 something similar to the Markdown mark "[M=E2=86=93]" to stand f=
or Pandoc-flavored Markdown.

I'm happy to produce new revisions, or alternative versions for differe=
nt purposes.

But I'd prefer to first hear from John whether he agrees with the direc=
tion in which this is going, and which variants he favors.
Only the reversed pilcrow, or + flipped, or + d, or d from another font? On=
 the same line or pushed together to form a square? Black or colored? Borde=
r or not?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to pand= oc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/= msgid/pandoc-discuss/6e303ba6-19cd-4778-9927-86628af62e41%40googlegroups.co= m.
------=_Part_3135_1263190119.1575768224906-- ------=_Part_3134_1413277351.1575768224906--