From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.text.pandoc/28583 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: fiddlosopher Newsgroups: gmane.text.pandoc Subject: Re: All entries in `references` are listed in bibliography, not only the cited ones Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:34:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <71de154c-86eb-440f-9abd-2b427a91fa99n@googlegroups.com> References: <12103c9c-602d-4f60-b699-471dcbceb1dfn@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_1524_2028736885.1623443666204" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11204"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: pandoc-discuss Original-X-From: pandoc-discuss+bncBDW7ZIEHTIIBBU4RR6DAMGQE4RE3UKI-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Fri Jun 11 22:34:29 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: gtp-pandoc-discuss@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from mail-ot1-f58.google.com ([209.85.210.58]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lrnrJ-0002gk-42 for gtp-pandoc-discuss@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 22:34:29 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-f58.google.com with SMTP id k11-20020a056830242bb0290400324955afsf2607749ots.14 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:34:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=b4vVHL2s469aqULd1n8rIevtbIgJOVuMlPSrOyAWgjw=; b=kym6D0bku/O0/eUlxxBmnYqjNJwiyk6A+IgzynIChqeMaclJ6z8xLhJO1EadW1ZCvf xZlqGzqiab6uEuIx0QmkD2AJw0WFRxM4/56kjz3iIDvsYjAEeqDSnqVks7tfKpOfThmJ uRhI85gyyzZl2E++juDdY9DpizanEl41ghpikgt8a+dZrAl73tX4aj/k9aEQMXJj8CUH CjZbZxo3ABQYms4EAUiYoD2aJxbGWPX/fJpk9KaHuBv5OPMm5cJwFQJiCbbjjr1D4jjv VDmWAp3dHL+J9rMq99wiKXVqYUG0Ybr/rzw06uXZCap0ADDrfMAqia/qGirfy9EytNNA RRhw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=b4vVHL2s469aqULd1n8rIevtbIgJOVuMlPSrOyAWgjw=; b=g+dS+PeqclNfY0XAUd6YIXedOjjdUJPr+ow0sqLOMZZsqiREkNYv3f8mf9zNxegWvq 6EaGoVGBiy4THtQxiv2rBH9wfMv1LBqQMp7S/NhkobBdR/ManrqZ1GdtCJsMqLl0lIIP PLIVIVlw8kTe6aAMOjIRQyalPxhJxBPSRGp0xt/ISYbVNzdXNADjz6aZ0e6ktIclYlYx Cbt8leb5bjE8QAiZE0nRvpaXgRhl58sIeGUEfkIYKD2+5mO3Ch2kMMDaq0xfUH/mApUV 6nFBWkHx1wwzUuuXGmXPn9sFz8w3eQ0uu4p5qDcx8SNuYnjQFIO3v45VxSsOCMAsRlwG yPlQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=b4vVHL2s469aqULd1n8rIevtbIgJOVuMlPSrOyAWgjw=; b=X6yIeWJ8jCAwM2cyujUzpO9QT1QUs/Z/8gpmV6ky8jCms0Q7BmMuZkXzJW/EofgBcf mFuSV6s28LjutxT3o7plu45S7GBSh3wjYxeLTFzwvPIt4/omTv9O7fZUAGiPbGgXl12m xV3M/pMsD6DwEvrxZkmvTCnsfovlVo5GCFFyE5gdU+ey6S0/0NR9Jj4I7KvkVDB9liZq Up6c9u84AMVC+BZYOeoRyFvYwE+Uu7TWzFJ3PByMZm61NBXYaF7br1IGKIJdQCUDb5oP 4J9MQBGlTsnIHBDnn/fKVDH3WfKbwew2ZVyPv/L1tLSwMVX5s64+JzXwTt8BIpETtckd MgMw== Original-Sender: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533FPjI6PPRQllbsrprYP6NAt+zkjZksJ5DfA4lL1N3DVKaRQ8ui d67jSNc+j/OlxGQnaHBONFQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyLNox3VC54bH0wloQWGscAgBFqJzXmigqsybrfnXOmP4FuWnfWaez9tRemK2/vz5m+PKGjrw== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2227:: with SMTP id o36mr4555565ota.309.1623443668150; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:34:28 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Original-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:bd6:: with SMTP id o22ls3177998oik.1.gmail; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:34:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:aca:4343:: with SMTP id q64mr3615640oia.33.1623443666719; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:34:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: fiddlosopher-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Precedence: list Mailing-list: list pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org; contact pandoc-discuss+owners-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1007024079513 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.text.pandoc:28583 Archived-At: ------=_Part_1524_2028736885.1623443666204 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1525_1445129583.1623443666204" ------=_Part_1525_1445129583.1623443666204 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It wasn't an intentional change, so please submit a bug report. On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 5:42:55 AM UTC-7 Nick Bart wrote: > I=E2=80=99m seeing this, too (using the most recent dev version), and agr= ee in=20 > preferring the =E2=80=98old=E2=80=99 behaviour. > > =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original = Message =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 > On Friday, June 11, 2021 11:44 AM, Frederik Elwert = =20 > wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > when upgrading pandoc in our publication workflow (2.9=E2=86=922.13), and= thus=20 > switching from pandoc-citeproc to citeproc, we noticed a change in=20 > behaviour: > > We are converting all references authors send us to csl-yaml and embedd= =20 > them within the markdown file through the `references` metadata variable. > > Previously, only those entries that were actually cited also got printed= =20 > in the bibliography. That=E2=80=99s what we expected. Now, with citeproc,= we find=20 > that *all* entries from the `references` list are printed in the=20 > bibliography. This is different from taking the same entries, putting the= m=20 > in an external bibtex file, and include them with the `bibliography`=20 > metadata key. If we do that, we get the old behaviour. > > So in sum, `references` now behaves like `bibliography` + `nocite: @*`. > > Is this the new intended behaviour, or is this a bug/regression? > > (For us, the older behaviour worked better, because often authors have=20 > additional entries in their bibliography, against the guidelines. The old= =20 > behaviour made sure we only include those that are actually cited. Now we= =20 > have to check the references list manually.) > > Thanks in advance, > Frederik > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= =20 > "pandoc-discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an= =20 > email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > To view this discussion on the web visit=20 > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/12103c9c-602d-4f60-b699-= 471dcbceb1dfn%40googlegroups.com=20 > > . > > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= pandoc-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/= pandoc-discuss/71de154c-86eb-440f-9abd-2b427a91fa99n%40googlegroups.com. ------=_Part_1525_1445129583.1623443666204 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It wasn't an intentional change, so please submit a bug report.

On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 5:42:55 AM UTC-7 Nick Bart wrote:
=
I=E2=80=99m = seeing this, too (using the most recent dev version), and agree in preferri= ng the=C2=A0=E2=80=98old=E2=80=99 behaviour.

=E2= =80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Messa= ge =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90
On Friday, June 11, 2021 11:44 AM, Frederik Elwert <frederi...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
=

Hello everybody,

when upgrading pandoc in our publication workflow (2.9=E2= =86=922.13), and thus switching from pandoc-citeproc to citeproc, we notice= d a change in behaviour:

We are converting all= references authors send us to csl-yaml and embedd them within the markdown= file through the `references` metadata variable.

<= div>Previously, only those entries that were actually cited also got printe= d in the bibliography. That=E2=80=99s what we expected. Now, with citeproc,= we find that *all* entries from the `references` list are printed in the b= ibliography. This is different from taking the same entries, putting them i= n an external bibtex file, and include them with the `bibliography` metadat= a key. If we do that, we get the old behaviour.

So in sum, `references` now behaves like `bibliography` + `nocite: @*`.

Is this the new intended behaviour, or is this = a bug/regression?

(For us, the older behaviour= worked better, because often authors have additional entries in their bibl= iography, against the guidelines. The old behaviour made sure we only inclu= de those that are actually cited. Now we have to check the references list = manually.)

Thanks in advance,
Fr= ederik


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G= oogle Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscrib= e from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org= .

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to pand= oc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d= /msgid/pandoc-discuss/71de154c-86eb-440f-9abd-2b427a91fa99n%40googlegroups.= com.
------=_Part_1525_1445129583.1623443666204-- ------=_Part_1524_2028736885.1623443666204--