Well: I fear this workaround does not work anymore: the wine library is a 
few steps behind windows development, and the new win architecture is not 
fully supported.

So, should I ask for a Linux static build for 32 bits?

Sincerely,

Luis

On Thursday, 15 August 2019 14:01:10 UTC-5, Luis Rivera wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, 12 August 2019 17:46:44 UTC-5, John MacFarlane wrote:
>>
>>
>> You can always spin up a build machine in the cloud, with more 
>> resources, and then use the resulting binary on your tiny machine. 
>>
>>
> I fear I don't know how to do that; in fact, once I tried to compile 
> pandoc on my own, and found the whole cabal/ghc incantation overwhelming (I 
> am no hacker, only and advanced luser). 
>
> However, I am happy to report that, after some sort of inspiration, it 
> occurred to me that I didn't have to run the qemu emulator to execute the 
> Linux x86_64 executable on the 32 bit system and machine, if I could run 
> the Windoze 32 bit executable under `wine` (n.b. a compatibility layer, not 
> an emulator) on the Tiny Core 32 / Intelx86_32 machine. And it worked (at 
> least so far)! 
>
> I'm leaving this crumb for others to pick up.
>
> Cheers!
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/71ee5649-ca62-4f89-a3b5-1f2d48459810%40googlegroups.com.